Which cam of these?

[Red94]

Ok im getting one of these cams, but i need help deciding. i want a lower powerband, like 1500-4500. i dont want to start making power way up there. this is the first cam
Intake
Exhaust

Duration @ .050
226°
236°

Valve Lift w/1.5 Rockers
.463
.474

Lobe Seperation Angle: 112° LSA

and heres the second
Intake
Exhaust

Duration @ .050
228°
228°

Valve Lift w.1.5 Rockers
.465
.465

Lobe Seperation Angle: 110°

Intake Centerline: 106°

this is gonna be a street driven 3.4, and i want good power for the street.

[viper98885]

They are both BIG cams, but the second one would be a little better for the street. It is the one I am running and I am very happy with it. Are you going to get a mild port & polish job done on the heads with the cam? If so, it will obviously bring out the power a lot more.

[Red94]

im not gettin the heads port and polished right now, i am in the future, but funds are limited. how does teh car sound at idle? and what kind of power does it make, and what is the powerband?

[whiteThunder]

y did you use the term "mild" viper, should one only port mildly with that cam, or should they shave as much crap out as possible?

[viper98885]

You should get at least a mild job done if anything (at least smooth the runners) so that the air flows better. If you can though, shave the **** out of them and go to town.

With the second cam, the car lopes a lot at idle. Be prepared to get an AFPR and some hotter spark plugs. Powerband is pretty high and very strong.

[whiteThunder]

k, thanks. i'm having them go to town on my heads!!!

[93camaro_zzz]

2nd one is better IMO.