from what i've seen, our rather large displacement engines have a pretty modest compression ratio of 9.4:1. I noticed too, that our engines get the job done on 87 octane, which isn't so for most vehicles out there that are considered 'performance' cars. the stock cam on our cars seems pretty conservative too. I realise the heads/cam package on ssm takes the compression ratio up to 9.6. what's the formula for how much more compression equals how much more hp? that was one question i had. octane withstanding would be my second question. what's the highest compression 93 octane could handle on our car? 10? 10.2 or so? a more aggressive cam and maybe a 1.75 rocker would see to make some decent power, without getting too in depth on the engine itself.
sometimes i wish that GM would have manufactured a 'performance' 3.8L, not just one that has lower compression and a blower, thus the L67. but maybe an NA top end engine? i think it's possible, 270 hp or so NA shouldn't be a problem...
sometimes i wish that GM would have manufactured a 'performance' 3.8L, not just one that has lower compression and a blower, thus the L67. but maybe an NA top end engine? i think it's possible, 270 hp or so NA shouldn't be a problem...
Comment