Ironman's Cam - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ironman's Cam

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ironman's Cam

    Ironman, I saw your specs and heard about your good gains on n2o. I will be running n2o as well, so I wanted some input from you. Are you running stock springs and retainers? Lifters? I need to hear your cam as well (I know theres a clip of it, but I haven't found it). If you were to do anything different (spec wise) would you change anything. I like the idea of keeping the lift to .450 so I can keep stock stuff though! I have heard a lot about your cam, but no input from you yet. THanks.
    1997 Chevrolet Camaro v6 - 13.8@104MPH
    1997 Dodge Viper GTS

  • #2
    Ironman24's still running the stock valvetrain. If anything I think staying under the max .500 lift is why he has not had issues like magnus and others.

    At some pt I am going with the same or a similar cam. Maybe a tad bit milder like 206 210 113ls.

    I've heard the car may times. It sounds pretty mean at idle and under normal driving. It has a good lope to it at idle.

    He'll probably be able to answer in more detail, though.
    Keith - 99 'maro - White M5 - bumpstick and boltons - 13.65 @ 101 N/A
    "I ain't too big to listen to the rumors, I'm just too @#$% big to pay attention to them" - Dr. Dre
    http://seppo.hopto.org/

    Comment


    • #3
      Cool, I just found a clip of it after a LOT of searching. It sounds good!!!!!!! Now, heres the question, would I stand to loose anything by tightening up the split duration a little? I think it would make it a little less choppy, but If it looses too much performance, i wont do it. I like magnus' cam a lot, but its just to much work for me! I respect him for doing that though, thats a mean mother f-er for sure. I just am too cheap to replace the valvetrain. Also I will be using the juicy juice, so I really liked his gain with that cam and n2o. I just want to be sure and get whats best for my car with my budget.

      [ October 21, 2002: Message edited by: AZ3.8Camaro ]</p>
      1997 Chevrolet Camaro v6 - 13.8@104MPH
      1997 Dodge Viper GTS

      Comment


      • #4
        <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by AZ3.8Camaro:
        Cool, I just found a clip of it after a LOT of searching. It sounds good!!!!!!! Now, heres the question, would I stand to loose anything by tightening up the split duration a little? I think it would make it a little less choppy, but If it looses to much performance, i will do it anyways. I like magnus' cam a lot, but its just to much work for me! I respect him for doing that though, thats a mean mother f-er for sure. I just am too cheap to replace the valvetrain. Also I will be using the juicy juice, so I really liked his gain with that cam and n2o. I just want to be sure and get whats best for my car with my budget.<hr></blockquote>

        Whats your budget?

        Springs arent that expensive. You should really pick some up. It will give you alot more options for cams. I would not recomend Ironman's cam. His cam is a regrind. I also have a CROWER regrind. I hate it. Its the whimpiest cam ever. ITs only temporary until compcam's gets cores. They are currently on backorder. Dont go with a pussy cam you will regret it.

        Comment


        • #5
          it didn't sound to weenie. He gained a lot of the n2o as well. I don't know then. How much for springs and retainers?
          1997 Chevrolet Camaro v6 - 13.8@104MPH
          1997 Dodge Viper GTS

          Comment


          • #6
            I never said Ironman's cam is weenie i said mine is. We have completly different grinds.

            Comment


            • #7
              I would be all over Ironman's regrind specs if it didn't cost so much.

              It costs more than a grind from a fresh core, but it is nice that it only sports .45 lift and can use the stock valvetrain.

              I believe that the only person that can give you that precise of a grind is Tom from SSM. Crower can't go that agressive if contacted directly from what I hear from pgriffith.

              So in comparison, its $340 for that regrind and about $300 for a new grind on a fresh core.

              But with an agressive cam from COMP you need springs/pushrods/possible headwork and whatever else so it adds up quickly.

              [ October 21, 2002: Message edited by: jonny985 ]</p>
              1996 Silver Camaro, Y87, M5, cammed..<br />N/A Best Time: 14.012 @ 98.59<br />195 rwhp / 233 ft-lbs b/f heads/cam<br />Check out my site <a href=\"http://silver3800.cz28.com/\" target=\"_blank\">http://silver3800.cz28.com/</a>

              Comment


              • #8
                <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by jonny985:
                I would be all over Ironman's regrind specs if it didn't cost so much.

                It costs more than a grind from a fresh core, but it is nice that it only sports .45 lift and can use the stock valvetrain.

                I believe that the only person that can give you that precise of a grind is Tom from SSM. Crower can go that agressive from what I hear from pgriffith.

                So in comparison, its $340 for that regrind and about $300 for a new grind on a fresh core.

                But with an agressive cam from COMP you need springs/pushrods/possible headwork and whatever else so it adds up quickly.
                <hr></blockquote>


                You also need pushrod's with a cam you would get from TOM at SSM. The cam's Tom sells are CROWER regrinds. I ordered directly through CROWER and didnt go through SSM and I think thats how it got screwed up.

                Comment


                • #9
                  SO I could get a new core made to the same specs as ironmans right? Then I could keep the same valvetrain? Magnus - If you read this, how much did you pay for your valvetrain? I don't want to be too cheap and dissapointed, I will wait and buy what I need, but I am looking for bang for the buck, you know? Magnus probably has the best, but most expensive, setup. If ironman's works well, then I think it would be a good deal.
                  Magnus' Cam or Ironmans Cam.. that is the question.....
                  Where is Ironman anyway??
                  1997 Chevrolet Camaro v6 - 13.8@104MPH
                  1997 Dodge Viper GTS

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I don't think that COMP can go with that low of a lift. You could probably go with lower ratio rocker arms to acheive that, that would cost too.

                    Here is the list of lobes that Magnus and other choose from from COMP
                    1996 Silver Camaro, Y87, M5, cammed..<br />N/A Best Time: 14.012 @ 98.59<br />195 rwhp / 233 ft-lbs b/f heads/cam<br />Check out my site <a href=\"http://silver3800.cz28.com/\" target=\"_blank\">http://silver3800.cz28.com/</a>

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by jonny985:
                      I don't think that COMP can go with that low of a lift. You could probably go with lower ratio rocker arms to acheive that, that would cost too.

                      Here is the list of lobes that Magnus and other choose from from COMP
                      <hr></blockquote>

                      Thats correct - comp can't grind an xtreme energy that low and keep the duration supposedly, so you must "tune" the lift with a rocker arm ratio of your choice. Honestly you won't lose anything running 1.6:1 though :D
                      2002 5-spd NBM Camaro
                      Details: www.1lev6.com

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        My setup isn't the best imho.. My valve springs suck *** ...

                        And just again, fyi the mp3 you guys heard isn't how rough the car normally is.. that was with a huge vacuum leak.. Its much smoother normall. [img]smile.gif[/img]

                        CC 918 valve springs shoul be around $175 and pushrods should be about $100... that should be all you need to run a faster ramping cam..

                        If your going to run .520'ish lift or higher.. you might need to get your valve seal pedastales milled down to prevent the seals from being crushed.
                        Keith - Chicago<br /><a href=\"http://www.hptuners.com\" target=\"_blank\">HP Tuners - PCM Reprogramming</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.dxsoftware.com/magnus/\" target=\"_blank\">97 Firebird V6 to LS1 swap</a><br /><b>V8 9.967@132.78</b> 1.322 60\' NA Heads/Cam<br /><b>V8 10.295@128.48</b> 1.363 60\' NA Cam Only<br /><b>V8 10.987@119.31</b> 1.422 60\' NA Stock Internals<br /><b>V6 13.674@98.22</b> NA<br /><b>V6 12.394@104.91</b> N20 100HP

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Magnus:


                          If your going to run .520'ish lift or higher.. you might need to get your valve seal pedastales milled down to prevent the seals from being crushed.
                          <hr></blockquote>

                          What does the pedastale look like? Is it the one the rockers sit on?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            the shaft that the valve stem sticks out of and the valve seal sits on.
                            Keith - Chicago<br /><a href=\"http://www.hptuners.com\" target=\"_blank\">HP Tuners - PCM Reprogramming</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.dxsoftware.com/magnus/\" target=\"_blank\">97 Firebird V6 to LS1 swap</a><br /><b>V8 9.967@132.78</b> 1.322 60\' NA Heads/Cam<br /><b>V8 10.295@128.48</b> 1.363 60\' NA Cam Only<br /><b>V8 10.987@119.31</b> 1.422 60\' NA Stock Internals<br /><b>V6 13.674@98.22</b> NA<br /><b>V6 12.394@104.91</b> N20 100HP

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Whats the highest lift you could go and not have to mill the pedastales? If I stick to stock rockers and better springs and pushrods? Magnus, I know that your car isn't normally that rough at idle, but heres probably the important question: Do you think your knock problem was caused by the cam? Man this is turning into a good thread!

                              Also nice new times Magnus! [img]graemlins/omg.gif[/img]
                              ME-------&gt; [img]smile.gif[/img]
                              MAGNUS---&gt; [img]graemlins/burnout.gif[/img]

                              [ October 21, 2002: Message edited by: AZ3.8Camaro ]</p>
                              1997 Chevrolet Camaro v6 - 13.8@104MPH
                              1997 Dodge Viper GTS

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              FORUM SPONSORS

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X