GT Comp Cam - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GT Comp Cam

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GT Comp Cam

    Has anyone used this cam yet in an N/A fbody? It's 210/210 .507/.507 112LS. I saw a post saying the VS cam sux for N/A use, but hadn't heard anything about the GT cam. A few people said they were ordering it in other threads. Just wondering how it is? Also, anyone get the 200/206 cam from COMPcams yet? Any news on that one?

  • #2
    I got it. Its pretty good. 220rwhp/240rwtq 13.79@97 and a mph best of 98.

    Though I got one of the original ZZP GT cams... so its got 111LS and 107IC.

    I do get the P0300 code some.
    Keith - 99 'maro - White M5 - bumpstick and boltons - 13.65 @ 101 N/A
    "I ain't too big to listen to the rumors, I'm just too @#$% big to pay attention to them" - Dr. Dre
    http://seppo.hopto.org/

    Comment


    • #3
      Sweet! [img]graemlins/thumbsup.gif[/img] :cool:
      <b>2000 NBM Pontiac Firebird</b><br />3800GT Performance Package<br /><br />Intake, Magnaflow Cat, Flowmaster Cat-Back

      Comment


      • #4
        i'm doing en engine rebuild on mine.i spoke with my mechanic yesterday and he would get my car ready next week. he installed 200/206 .496 .480 112. also he replaced the heads cause the originals were craked.as far as i know i'm getting the cam, 3 angle valve job, used heads, cam bearings,piston rings,valve springs, retainers and god knows what else. i'll get the details on this, next week and the dyno numbers as soon as i finished the break in. hopefully i'll get good numbers [img]smile.gif[/img] .

        [ September 26, 2003: Message edited by: 99redcamaro ]</p>
        2003 Mustang Mach 1 5 Speed<br />288 rwhp SAE 315 rwtq SAE<br />BFG DR\'s, SLP Loudmouth Catback, K&N CAI<br />60\': 2.145<br />13.41@105.67MPH (Stock)<br />--- Best et ----<br />60: 1.932<br />1/4:12.851@106.39MPH <br />best mph: 107.65

        Comment


        • #5
          hey seppo.. what other mods, gears, and weight reduction did you have in order to run those times with that cam?


          how would that cam be with stock weight, heads, and gears.

          EDIT. sorry if its not making too much sense. i just got back from a party. i'll correct it tomorrow

          [ September 26, 2003: Message edited by: Tyler ]</p>
          96 Camaro M5. Dark metallic gree (?dont know the offical color name)<br />Home made Intake :: Headers, 3inch headers back to Flowmaster muffler :: spec stage 3 clutch Now installed, waiting for 3.42\'s and LSD next month<br /><a href=\"http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/RiceEatingCamaro/?action=view&current=newcar.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">My Car</a> <br /><br />Totalled Car.<br /><a href=\"http://bellsouthpwp.net/s/k/sk8er305/\" target=\"_blank\">96 CamaroRS</a>

          Comment


          • #6
            I bought that CAM as well but haven't installed it yet. I'll post when I've done the work.
            1996 Silver Camaro, Y87, M5, cammed..<br />N/A Best Time: 14.012 @ 98.59<br />195 rwhp / 233 ft-lbs b/f heads/cam<br />Check out my site <a href=\"http://silver3800.cz28.com/\" target=\"_blank\">http://silver3800.cz28.com/</a>

            Comment


            • #7
              <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Tyler:
              hey seppo.. what other mods, gears, and weight reduction did you have in order to run those times with that cam?

              how would that cam be with stock weight, heads, and gears.
              [ September 26, 2003: Message edited by: Tyler ]
              <hr></blockquote>

              http://seppo.hopto.org/13sec.html

              I still have stock heads and exhaust manifolds. W/ 3.23's I was stuck at about 14.1. I was hitting the rev limiter in 3rd just b/f the line. Also launching at 3500 rpm was about all my clutch could hold.
              Keith - 99 'maro - White M5 - bumpstick and boltons - 13.65 @ 101 N/A
              "I ain't too big to listen to the rumors, I'm just too @#$% big to pay attention to them" - Dr. Dre
              http://seppo.hopto.org/

              Comment


              • #8
                Seppo, do you feel that your P&P manifolds helped much with stock heads? Just curious.
                1997 Chevrolet Camaro v6 - 13.8@104MPH
                1997 Dodge Viper GTS

                Comment


                • #9
                  <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by AZ3.8Camaro:
                  Seppo, do you feel that your P&P manifolds helped much with stock heads? Just curious.<hr></blockquote>

                  I dunno. If anything I would have to say yes. B/c my maft is set to like 6% rich at wot.
                  Keith - 99 'maro - White M5 - bumpstick and boltons - 13.65 @ 101 N/A
                  "I ain't too big to listen to the rumors, I'm just too @#$% big to pay attention to them" - Dr. Dre
                  http://seppo.hopto.org/

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    whats the difference between a 111 lobe seperation and a 112 lobe seperation?

                    is there really that big of a difference?
                    96 Camaro M5. Dark metallic gree (?dont know the offical color name)<br />Home made Intake :: Headers, 3inch headers back to Flowmaster muffler :: spec stage 3 clutch Now installed, waiting for 3.42\'s and LSD next month<br /><a href=\"http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/RiceEatingCamaro/?action=view&current=newcar.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">My Car</a> <br /><br />Totalled Car.<br /><a href=\"http://bellsouthpwp.net/s/k/sk8er305/\" target=\"_blank\">96 CamaroRS</a>

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      99redcamaro, I wanted to put the same cam in my car. When you get some results can you e-mail them to me? JA_Medure@excite.com

                      How do you like it so far? A noticible difference?
                      Thanks, <br />JAM<p>02 Firebird GT

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Tyler, if u want an in-depth take on Lobe Separation, use the Cam Guide in another thread in Advanced Tech. But basically, the smaller your Lobe Separation, the 'tighter' your power will be made. What that means is that a bigger lobe separation will have more of a flat curve in power with a lower peak HP. The smaller lobe separation will have less power at lower parts of the RPM range, but a higher peak HP. It also moves your power band further up the RPM's.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          0300 is a multiple misfire code. That isn't good, if the cam is doing that. Are you still getting that code?
                          2004 CE Corvette 10.86@132mph
                          1996 Supercharged/Nitrous Camaro RS (For Sale)
                          2011 Cadillac CTS-V
                          2011 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder GT-P
                          2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Shirl:
                            0300 is a multiple misfire code. That isn't good, if the cam is doing that. Are you still getting that code?<hr></blockquote>

                            Its common w/ stock pcm's and some aftermarket cams. The pcm reads the lope as a mistaken misfire. LS1's have the same occurance w/ some aftermarket cams.
                            Keith - 99 'maro - White M5 - bumpstick and boltons - 13.65 @ 101 N/A
                            "I ain't too big to listen to the rumors, I'm just too @#$% big to pay attention to them" - Dr. Dre
                            http://seppo.hopto.org/

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by JAM:
                              99redcamaro, I wanted to put the same cam in my car. When you get some results can you e-mail them to me? JA_Medure@excite.com

                              How do you like it so far? A noticible difference?
                              <hr></blockquote>


                              i would be getting my car this week probably monday or tuesday. i have to wait at least 500 miles before stomping on it. i'm getting a free dyno so as soon as i put those 500 miles i'll get those results for you and everybody here.

                              thanks
                              2003 Mustang Mach 1 5 Speed<br />288 rwhp SAE 315 rwtq SAE<br />BFG DR\'s, SLP Loudmouth Catback, K&N CAI<br />60\': 2.145<br />13.41@105.67MPH (Stock)<br />--- Best et ----<br />60: 1.932<br />1/4:12.851@106.39MPH <br />best mph: 107.65

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              FORUM SPONSORS

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X