Tweet
I emailed comp cams and asked them what the best street cam for my car is and they wrote "You could use our part number 76-801-9 cam. It has 255/262 advertised duration and 200/206 at .050. The lift of the cam is 517/498 and it has a 112 lobe separation" is this sound like a good cam? I have 1999 Camaro M5, RKSport Whisper Lid, Dynomax muffler, Jet Stage 2 module, RKSport headers comming soon. Thanks a lot guys!
-
Black 99 M5 Camaro \"6BANGER\"<p>Sport Appearance Package, Whisper Lid, SLP Cold Air Kit, K&N Filter,Dynomax Custom Cat-Back, BMR STB, Jet Stage II Module, Centerforce Dual Friction Clutch, Hurst Shifter with Custom Short Stick, RKSport 2\" Drop Springs, SS Hood, Poly Tranny Mount & TA Bushing, SLP 3.42 Gears with LSD, All Amsoil Synthetic Lubricants -
I dont like it. Try getting a cam with a little more duration. -
weak, but shouldnt cause problems. Go do cam research instead of writing "What would be a good cam for me?"
If you're not willing to go learn, you don't deserve a cam... If you have problems with it, you wouldn't know where to start.2002 5-spd NBM Camaro
Details: www.1lev6.comComment
-
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by pgriffith:
Try getting a cam with a little more duration.<hr></blockquote>
WHAT! [img]graemlins/omg.gif[/img] More than 255/262!!
No one has even come close to suggesting a cam with that much duration.Robert - owner www.FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com
"Mid-life crisis? I'm way beyond that!"
1996 Black Firebird GTxxxRam Air V6 w/ M5xxxwww.FirebirdGT.com
RavenComment
-
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by FirebirdGT:
WHAT! [img]graemlins/omg.gif[/img] More than 255/262!!
No one has even come close to suggesting a cam with that much duration.<hr></blockquote>
200/206 at .050 :)\'98 A4 Camaro v6->v8 conversion, and STS kit next<br />v6: 13.6 Powerdyne, 13.2 150 shot, 13.8 120 shot, 14.3 85 shot, 15.7 stock<br />v8(na): 12.18@113, 392rwhp<br />Moderator on <a href=\"http://www.mtfba.org\" target=\"_blank\">www.mtfba.org</a> and <a href=\"http://www.frrax.com\" target=\"_blank\">www.frrax.com</a> (Road Race & Autocross)<br /><a href=\"http://community.webshots.com/user/johnduncan10\" target=\"_blank\">Car pics</a>, <a href=\"http://www.trscca.com\" target=\"_blank\">TN Region SCCA</a>Comment
-
Robert, thats advertised which may be .005/.006 vs .050Keith - Chicago<br /><a href=\"http://www.hptuners.com\" target=\"_blank\">HP Tuners - PCM Reprogramming</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.dxsoftware.com/magnus/\" target=\"_blank\">97 Firebird V6 to LS1 swap</a><br /><b>V8 9.967@132.78</b> 1.322 60\' NA Heads/Cam<br /><b>V8 10.295@128.48</b> 1.363 60\' NA Cam Only<br /><b>V8 10.987@119.31</b> 1.422 60\' NA Stock Internals<br /><b>V6 13.674@98.22</b> NA<br /><b>V6 12.394@104.91</b> N20 100HPComment
-
more duration, more emphases on exhaust, slightly more lift.2001 Arctic White Firebird<br />More mods than I\'m allowed to list!Comment
-
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Magnus:
Robert, thats advertised which may be .005/.006 vs .050<hr></blockquote>
OK, re-read it. Trying to multi-task and blew over the second part.Robert - owner www.FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com
"Mid-life crisis? I'm way beyond that!"
1996 Black Firebird GTxxxRam Air V6 w/ M5xxxwww.FirebirdGT.com
RavenComment
-
so what do cam you guys think I should get; not too aggressive; no computer reprogramming, but a respectable HP gain
come on guys talk to me!Black 99 M5 Camaro \"6BANGER\"<p>Sport Appearance Package, Whisper Lid, SLP Cold Air Kit, K&N Filter,Dynomax Custom Cat-Back, BMR STB, Jet Stage II Module, Centerforce Dual Friction Clutch, Hurst Shifter with Custom Short Stick, RKSport 2\" Drop Springs, SS Hood, Poly Tranny Mount & TA Bushing, SLP 3.42 Gears with LSD, All Amsoil Synthetic LubricantsComment
-
how about 206/212 112LS? would chop decently and not need programming..Keith - Chicago<br /><a href=\"http://www.hptuners.com\" target=\"_blank\">HP Tuners - PCM Reprogramming</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.dxsoftware.com/magnus/\" target=\"_blank\">97 Firebird V6 to LS1 swap</a><br /><b>V8 9.967@132.78</b> 1.322 60\' NA Heads/Cam<br /><b>V8 10.295@128.48</b> 1.363 60\' NA Cam Only<br /><b>V8 10.987@119.31</b> 1.422 60\' NA Stock Internals<br /><b>V6 13.674@98.22</b> NA<br /><b>V6 12.394@104.91</b> N20 100HPComment
-
Will that cam give me good low end TQ, I Want a cam that gives me good low end TQ, a choppy idle, good HP results, no commputer reprogramming, and no headwork, I am willing to do new valve springs, lifters, valve seats, etc. Just no head milling or anything of that nature. ThanksBlack 99 M5 Camaro \"6BANGER\"<p>Sport Appearance Package, Whisper Lid, SLP Cold Air Kit, K&N Filter,Dynomax Custom Cat-Back, BMR STB, Jet Stage II Module, Centerforce Dual Friction Clutch, Hurst Shifter with Custom Short Stick, RKSport 2\" Drop Springs, SS Hood, Poly Tranny Mount & TA Bushing, SLP 3.42 Gears with LSD, All Amsoil Synthetic LubricantsComment
-
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by scr8pn99camaro:
Will that cam give me good low end TQ, I Want a cam that gives me good low end TQ, a choppy idle, good HP results, no commputer reprogramming, and no headwork, I am willing to do new valve springs, lifters, valve seats, etc. Just no head milling or anything of that nature. Thanks<hr></blockquote>
This cam 206/212 112LS might raise the HP and TQ up in the RPM but it will still have more low end TQ then stock. It sounds like a decent cam.
[ January 16, 2003: Message edited by: pgriffith ]</p>Comment
-
I think 206/212 114lsa might be a better cam for n/a.2004 Dodge Dakota 3.7 litres of raw power!!<br />Nothing but a 6!<br />Do you know for sure? John 3:18Comment
-
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by toast:
I think 206/212 114lsa might be a better cam for n/a.<hr></blockquote>
Yes but with a 113 or a 112 lsa.Comment
Comment