Welcome to the FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
just a quick question... if the air intake is the downside of the 3.4, why not just bolt on the intake from a 2.8 fiero motor. Just as they do in the 3.4 swap for the fieros. thnx
the tpi setup from fieros and 3rd gens is wayyyy more restrictive than the 3.4 upper.....plus it wont fit under the cowl on a 4th gen
Wolf<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/249111/7\" target=\"_blank\">95 black t-top camaro</a>,3.4 5 speed,ud pullies,plugs/wires,de-shaft tb & gutted airbox, homemaid short throw shifter
OK. So to do the 3400 swap on the 3.4 (just heads and intake assembly), you are saying that you need the 3400 pistons, as they are dished whereas the 3.4L must be flattops. My question is if you can get by, by doubling the head gaskets, to lessen the compression ratio? That should knock it down enough to use mid-high octane gas and be safe?? Anyone with insight on this/
i still want to know if the coolant passage in the area of the head where the head gasket is, is going to cause over heating and meltdown situations in the block...or is the aluminum head going to behave differently
From all my reading and research it's safe to say that the CR will be upwards of 11-12:1...if one was to use the double gaskets go a step colder on plugs maybe, and run 93 octane, with tuning capabilities such as megasquirt etc....couldn't you get away with a high compression motor...or is it more or less no one has really tried therefore no one knows??
Hi there, I plan on doing this top end swap in the summer. Can anyone here who has done this please tell me every single piece I need to do this job? By every piece i mean right down to the smallest screw. I have emailed the guy who started this thread. And he was very helpful with replying, but he hasnt made a list of every single part yet. So if anyone here who has done this please make a list of every single part, that would be very much appreciated.
GOD DAMN IT!!!!!! ok you phuckers are completly ignoring the fact that the coolant pasages in the block DO NOT mate up to the cooland passage in the head...now some dumb @ss decided he wanted to post picks of the intake passage...what i want to know about is the god damn mother phucking head gasket...the motors have different gaskets with collant holes in different places
Aside from one difference right above the bottom corner bolt hole, what is the problem? If the aluminum head does not have a coolant passage in the lower corners you simply use the 3400 gasket as Storm says. And what the hell is your problem anyway?
GOD DAMN IT!!!!!! ok you phuckers are completly ignoring the fact that the coolant pasages in the block DO NOT mate up to the cooland passage in the head...now some dumb @ss decided he wanted to post picks of the intake passage...what i want to know about is the god damn mother phucking head gasket...the motors have different gaskets with collant holes in different places
Originally posted by nightrider2
FINALLY...thats the piece of information i was looking for
my problem is that i've asked this question befor and every one ignors it...or sends me wrong info...not to mention the fact that most of you's are a bunch of smart *** and have and ego bigger than your car
Not much going on, replaced my Kenwood double din stereo with a Pioneer double din, the Kenwood had problems. Then replaced my power inverter for my reverse...
2 weeks ago
FORUM SPONSORS
Collapse
Working...
X
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Comment