Welcome to the FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
no point to doing a smaller pushrod engine. 3800s are proven reliable and virtually indestructible. there is a guy running 773rwhp on one. search.
\'97 Camaro M5 Y87 3.23 LSD, homebrew CAI, highfloCat, Flowmaster catback, Pacesetter headers, specstage3 clutch and aluminum flywheel, !egr, 2kW system.<br /><br />Possible L67 bottom end w/ abbott heads and a turbo in the works... gotta do more homework
i just bought a 93 Camaro V6 3.4L for $400 , it runs well, it has a K&N Highflow air intake. i dont know what to mod, to have few horses on it. what pasrts need to be moded?
i was also thinking of just buying a 3800 engine from ebay. i seen one for $500. i was told the supercharger used on the REGAL GS wasnt going to fit on a camaros 3800 engine.
i just bought a 93 Camaro V6 3.4L for $400 , it runs well, it has a K&N Highflow air intake. i dont know what to mod, to have few horses on it. what pasrts need to be moded?
You probably thought because there are v6's out there with ~250hp why not just swap that in.... but those are also completely different technologies, you can't even compare those double overhead cams to our pushrod engine not to mention you wouldn't be able to get it to work....
And you obviously don't know what you're talking about when you said 3.8's had small #'s compared to other v6's of the 90's and 2000's.....the main GM marketing campaign for the early 3.8 camaro's was that it had #'s equal to that of a then-current generation mustang GT.
i dont think theres a gt mustang in the 90s that has equal numbers as our 6's...specially not the newer body styles...and as for my v6 question i was basically wondering if there ARE any v6's of today that would work for our cars and a good engine and upgrade...
k did a search a 93 gt ran a 16.1...big deal 1 mustang gt was slower then our 6's and plus that was the 1st year for that body style...i dont think our v6s were meant to outrun a gt mustang though
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Comment