Welcome to the FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
k did a search a 93 gt ran a 16.1...big deal 1 mustang gt was slower then our 6's and plus that was the 1st year for that body style...i dont think our v6s were meant to outrun a gt mustang though
Its the 93 up GT that had the first generation of the ford 4.6l, from the 5l used in the years before. Those GT's had same #'s as the same year Camaro v6's and ran 16's. If you can't find that it just means you don't know how to use the internet/lack common knowledge.
BTW: Read this.....from a completely unrelated site
I did a 14.9@93 in my stock Y87 minus spare tire and jack. I also did 14.3@96 with a removed exhaust, aluminum flywheel, deleted EGR, deleted MAF screen and stg. 3 clutch on 205/70R15 snow tires mounted on old steel wheels. I eat Mustang GTs all day, and I did so stock as well. I am an excellent driver and there is very little time spent shifting, and I rule at launching my car ;)
Those SN95 (1994-1998) Mustangs are high 14s in manual trim. The autos are easily 15 second cars that our 3800s can keep up with, the 3.4 guys aren't as lucky there.
I've killed a couple of SN95 cobras by car lengths. A matter of driving as well as power to weight ratio. I can't wait for my gforce transmission and 4.10 gears to see how I do against my friend's '07 GT. I'm a better driver so I think I have a good chance from a dig.
I would take my 3800 camaro over a 90s GT anyday. Even the autos with open rears have an advantage over a 90s mustang - Handling. :)
\'97 Camaro M5 Y87 3.23 LSD, homebrew CAI, highfloCat, Flowmaster catback, Pacesetter headers, specstage3 clutch and aluminum flywheel, !egr, 2kW system.<br /><br />Possible L67 bottom end w/ abbott heads and a turbo in the works... gotta do more homework
i never said i wanted a mustang......and it was mid to high 14's btw...and i did see the mustang running a 16 but was only the 93 gt, 94 and up was in the 14's...and airattack? im gonna continue to say go play in rush hour traffic u douche
Its the 93 up GT that had the first generation of the ford 4.6l, from the 5l used in the years before. Those GT's had same #'s as the same year Camaro v6's and ran 16's. If you can't find that it just means you don't know how to use the internet/lack common knowledge.
BTW: Read this.....from a completely unrelated site
negative. 94-95 sn95s were still 5.0's. 96 the 4.6 came out. greenmachine as always has been misinformed and wont listen. quit being so hard headed and listen for a change.
current car- 95 Trans am- bolt ons, parked and collecting dust. why? because **** it
its only pointless because you wont listen. every arguement youre involved in you look like a idiot. you always think youre right, and you have yet to be once.
current car- 95 Trans am- bolt ons, parked and collecting dust. why? because **** it
When viewing this list, please keep in mind that day to day testing conditions are not always perfect (or even consistent) due to weather and track conditions! The results that "the experts" have provided may NOT reflect what your car is capable of doing under your conditions. This list is only meant to be a guideline, NOT THE GOSPEL!!! We are not trying to publish the exact (or even the best) numbers that a specific make and model of car can run every time out of the box.
Yes, but you would need to heavily modify the intake manifolds as they are meant for a FWD aplication. Also, if the bolt pattern isn't the same as teh 3800s, which there is a good chance it's not, you will have a problem fitting a transmission to it for our cars.
and I don't care what anyone says, 97 Y87 stock versus 97 GT stock is close, but in favor of the GT. If you're a good driver and the GT driver isn't as good on the shifts you have a good chance. if you have an a4 vert then you'll most likely lose. I drove an a4 vert 3.8 and I felt my Frontier could beat it.
\'97 Camaro M5 Y87 3.23 LSD, homebrew CAI, highfloCat, Flowmaster catback, Pacesetter headers, specstage3 clutch and aluminum flywheel, !egr, 2kW system.<br /><br />Possible L67 bottom end w/ abbott heads and a turbo in the works... gotta do more homework
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Comment