So (cam lift) * (rocker ratio) = valve lift. I've read up that everyone advises against using big ratio rockers with an aftermarket cam, reason I'm guessing being the resulted lift is excessive. now if I were to custom grind a cam with a long duration (something like 224deg) and a lift that would result in something like .530 on a 1.8 rocker, would there be any advantage to the longer rocker versus a cam ground for use with a 1.6 rocker?
In other words, the cam ground for the 1.6 rockers has a higher lift, but still results in .530 lift at the valve and the cam ground for the 1.8 rockers still results in .530 lift at the valve also.
I figure there would be less travel for the pushrods and it would result in equal valve lift, less stress on the lifters and maybe higher revs?
Basically, I plan on a bigger cam than what I have now, and with cam comes full valvetrain. Which way sounds like a better game plan?
In other words, the cam ground for the 1.6 rockers has a higher lift, but still results in .530 lift at the valve and the cam ground for the 1.8 rockers still results in .530 lift at the valve also.
I figure there would be less travel for the pushrods and it would result in equal valve lift, less stress on the lifters and maybe higher revs?
Basically, I plan on a bigger cam than what I have now, and with cam comes full valvetrain. Which way sounds like a better game plan?
Comment