Rocker Arms? - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rocker Arms?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Rocker Arms?

    If you deck the heads, you will alter valvetrain geometry. Check for correct pushrod length before reinstalling everything.
    <a href=\"http://www.fullthrottlev6.com\" target=\"_blank\">www.fullthrottlev6.com</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.chitownracing.com\" target=\"_blank\">www.chitownracing.com</a>

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Rocker Arms?

      compression ratio..
      I just bought a 97 pcm about 10 minutes ago so i won't be needing that, I was checking out that link though and they've got some decent deals, I'm still undecided exactly what i'm going to do.
      sigpic
      1996 Chevrolet Camaro
      1995 Buick Park Avenue Ultra
      --Appearance Moderator--

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Rocker Arms?

        I'm aware of this, but like IDoVoodoo said, it would only be taking off about 0.030" which shouldn't screw up the valve train geometry too bad. Even if I go a little more, I should be able to machine everything to work right.
        sigpic
        1996 Chevrolet Camaro
        1995 Buick Park Avenue Ultra
        --Appearance Moderator--

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Rocker Arms?

          in any event let me know how it goes...since Im thinking of doing the exact same thing minus the CR at this point in time...

          2002 SOM Z28 Camaro - 12.9 @ 104 mph
          1996 3800 Camaro - 13.43 @ 100.77 mph


          Project Cars | How To Guides | Scratch Repair | Synthetic Oil

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Rocker Arms?

            Well, the P&P is done, and the valve job will be done in about 2-3 more hours work, but I've found myself running very low on cash, so I'm unsure when I will be able to finish this project, and I might just install the P&Pd heads without rockers for the time being, well see..
            sigpic
            1996 Chevrolet Camaro
            1995 Buick Park Avenue Ultra
            --Appearance Moderator--

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Rocker Arms?

              Originally posted by TheGr8Schlotzky
              Well, the P&P is done, and the valve job will be done in about 2-3 more hours work, but I've found myself running very low on cash, so I'm unsure when I will be able to finish this project, and I might just install the P&Pd heads without rockers for the time being, well see..

              When you install em let me know the kind of gains you got from just the P&P and what other mods you have done to support it

              thanks bro

              2002 SOM Z28 Camaro - 12.9 @ 104 mph
              1996 3800 Camaro - 13.43 @ 100.77 mph


              Project Cars | How To Guides | Scratch Repair | Synthetic Oil

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Rocker Arms?

                From what i've figured out about the difference in stock style rockers and rollers are that they do offer a little less friction on the tip, lighter than stock, and with the comp pro mags I got they say they're supposed to be much more stable in high rpm use, which makes sense to me.

                I say if your going to get different rockers or just higher ratio with stiffer springs it gonna put more pressure on the pushrods. Why not get some insurance and have some stronger ones and if your gonna get your heads plained and/or thinner head gaskets id call either zzp, intense, abbott about the right pushrod length just to be sure.

                You could probably put your springs on yor heads when you install them so when and if you ever do put rockers on it'll make it that much easier.
                1998 Camaro A4<br />K&N filter, MSD coils, MSD plug wires, NGK TR6 plugs, Flowmaster exhaust. 10.2@73.5-1/8mi

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Rocker Arms?

                  Pushrods are probably a good idea. I'd go with a 7.00" pushrod for your application, stock is 7.020, while most companies list 7.050 as a stock replacement. Also, stay with stock lifters, not aftermarket. The stock allow more room for error than CompCam's do. Stock lifters have a range of +/- .080, where as CompCam's only have 1/2 that, so you have to be more precise with your measuring. And, for that price, I'd go ahead and go with roller rockers. If you're getting closer to $300, then why not go ahead and get the aluminum rollers? Less stress and friction on the valvetrain, they're about 1/2 the weight, they look better, and will last longer.
                  Last edited by RadRacer; 11-08-2007, 12:24 PM.
                  ~97 3.8L V6 Camaro~
                  A few things

                  Only Member of Team Hooker?!?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Rocker Arms?

                    If your staying with the stock ratio 1.6 ocker, roller tip rockers don't add any more power. Just stick with the stock rockers. This is what Zoomer at ZZperformance told me, since I can't go up to 1.7 ratio with my cam. He said there would be no gains in going to a roller tip. Pretty nice guy since I was getting ready to spend $400+ on some rocker arms. I don't think he would talk me out of spening $400 if he wasn't honest. Also ask about the 3/8 7.05 pushrods, said just use the 5/16 7.05 no need for the 3/8 size. Right now I'm running Comp lifters with lightweight pushrods, no problems in 3 years with the Comps, just install them correctly. I will be switching my valve springs to Comp 105's with steel retainers, comp locks and Viton valve guides here shortly. Well see how that goes.
                    08' L76 6.0L 4X4 Chevy EXT.Cab LTZ Vortec MAX with Snug top cover, Dynomax exhaust,Hptuners& K&N intake
                    96' Camaro M5 to A4 conversion, alot of mods . GT35R Turbo full suspension. Built engine

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Rocker Arms?

                      a lightweight full roller rocker won't have any gains? even stock ratio would have some

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Rocker Arms?

                        Originally posted by IDoVoodoo
                        a lightweight full roller rocker won't have any gains? even stock ratio would have some
                        "With stock heads, I recommend stock rockers. You can’t run 1.7s and there isn’t a gain from going to roller 1.6’s".

                        Zooomer

                        This is what he emailed me, since I have the VS cam I can't run the 1.7's.

                        And this is what they said about the pushrods:

                        "You can run the 3/8s pushrods if you want but there really isn’t a noticeable difference(performance wise) between them and the standard ones".
                        Last edited by ssms5411; 11-08-2007, 03:47 PM.
                        08' L76 6.0L 4X4 Chevy EXT.Cab LTZ Vortec MAX with Snug top cover, Dynomax exhaust,Hptuners& K&N intake
                        96' Camaro M5 to A4 conversion, alot of mods . GT35R Turbo full suspension. Built engine

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Rocker Arms?

                          Originally posted by ssms5411
                          "With stock heads, I recommend stock rockers. You can’t run 1.7s and there isn’t a gain from going to roller 1.6’s".

                          Zooomer

                          This is what he emailed me, since I have the VS cam I can't run the 1.7's.

                          And this is what they said about the pushrods:

                          "You can run the 3/8s pushrods if you want but there really isn’t a noticeable difference(performance wise) between them and the standard ones".
                          less friction and lighter weight means more power...doesnt matter how you put it...now, how much power is a completly different question...and also it wont give you more power, it will free up what is already there

                          2002 SOM Z28 Camaro - 12.9 @ 104 mph
                          1996 3800 Camaro - 13.43 @ 100.77 mph


                          Project Cars | How To Guides | Scratch Repair | Synthetic Oil

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Rocker Arms?

                            Yes, it'll free up more ponies. Let's say you have to move 2 loads of bricks. The first load, each brick weighs 15 pounds. But, the 2nd load, each brick weighs only 5 pounds. Do you think you'll get the 2nd load done quicker and easier than the first load? In the same sense, do you think you engine will rev up quicker and easier with lighter parts?
                            ~97 3.8L V6 Camaro~
                            A few things

                            Only Member of Team Hooker?!?

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Rocker Arms?

                              If your not getting a cam and wondering about rockers go roller. If you dont have a cam you can go higher with the rocker ratio and if your upgrading id say save a lil more go roller.

                              since ive had my heads clearanced i'm gonna be running a GT3 cam and 1.73 comp pro mag roller rockers
                              1998 Camaro A4<br />K&N filter, MSD coils, MSD plug wires, NGK TR6 plugs, Flowmaster exhaust. 10.2@73.5-1/8mi

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Rocker Arms?

                                I agree with the less weight on the valvatrain thats why I asked him about running the roller 1.6's, I don't know why he wouldn't recommend it, basicly he just lost a $420 sale. I run the Comp light weight pushrods already for about 3 years now, he said that he has seen many light weight pushrods break. This had me really worried, but he said since I have ran them this long without any issues, they should be fine. I have ran them with the powerdyne with around 300 wrhp and 330 tq, and have been running a 125 wet shot for about a year now. For the record I wasn't saying rollers are a waste, I was just going by what ZZperformance emailed me back saying. Which I thought was wrong also.
                                08' L76 6.0L 4X4 Chevy EXT.Cab LTZ Vortec MAX with Snug top cover, Dynomax exhaust,Hptuners& K&N intake
                                96' Camaro M5 to A4 conversion, alot of mods . GT35R Turbo full suspension. Built engine

                                Comment

                                Latest Topics

                                Collapse

                                FORUM SPONSORS

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X