I got a 98 camaro, i was debating wheather i should stroke my 3.8 to a 4.2 or drop in an ls1. .. .. the stroker kit is about 2500. LS1's run about the same but then theres like 3 grand of extras i have to get. .. .. but they produce way more power. Any one here done either? if so can up some pics and detail about the conversion and/or stroker kit.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
4.2 Stroker Vs. LS1
Collapse
X
-
Re: 4.2 Stroker Vs. LS1
I havent done either but if you did the stroker kit you could rebuild you engine so you would have a pretty much brand new engine. Than instead of having to spend 3grand on parts to make a LS1 mount up right you could buy a pro charger and then you would be making more power than a LS1 for sure.
-
Re: 4.2 Stroker Vs. LS1
If it were me, I'd do the stroker. Just because it's something different. You look around for people asking about more power, and everyone suggests a LS1. I say screw it, be the freak and stand out from the rest of the crowd :) Go with the stroker~97 3.8L V6 Camaro~
A few things
Only Member of Team Hooker?!?
Comment
-
Re: 4.2 Stroker Vs. LS1
The stroker kit itself is that much but then if your going to go that far you may as well do heads, manifolds and valvetrain to make it really worth it. Now your right back to LS1 territory. Toss up either way but if I had 7500 to put towards it, it would be a stroker.Let's flip a coin. Heads I get tail, Tails I get head.
Comment
-
-
Re: 4.2 Stroker Vs. LS1
wow i didnt even know a kit like this existed. well...one more thing to add to my to do list. now for the question everyone always asks....*sigh*....how much hp would an otherwise stock stroked 4.2 make? yes it probably depends on many things, im simply looking for an estimate.
1999 Firebird Y87/W68
Comment
-
Re: 4.2 Stroker Vs. LS1
~60hp more than a stock engine with a stroker. The thing with strokers is the torque you gain though, much better than stock :)
Comment
-
Re: 4.2 Stroker Vs. LS1
so you'd be in the same range as the LT-1 if your gaining ~60hp and considerably more torque1996 Silver Camaro RS, A4, K&N CAI, Flowtech exhaust, !MAF screen.
http://www.fquick.com/96silverbullet
Comment
-
Re: 4.2 Stroker Vs. LS1
What about the zzp kit? http://www.zzperformance.com/grand_p...=230&catid=109 its only $1450, but then again its only 4.05L
Comment
-
Re: 4.2 Stroker Vs. LS1
well, i vote go with the stroked 4.2
my question though is that 3800stroked offers a 10.1:1 compression ratio and a 8.2:1 compression ratio for power adder aplications. ZZP's kit's compression ratio raises it up to 10.2:1, and they say you will be fine running 6-10psi with their kit. so would one be safe running 6-10psi on the 3800stroked 10.1:1 kit?
Originally posted by 97rs4life~60hp more than a stock engine with a stroker. The thing with strokers is the torque you gain though, much better than stock :)Last edited by 99BlackW68; 02-05-2008, 05:18 PM.
1999 Firebird Y87/W68
Comment
Latest Topics
Collapse
-
Hello every one, ozzy here ive been looking at this page for weeks now finally joined. So my question is why is it that every turbo build forum just ends...18 hours ago
-
by 2.8 BirdI wish you guys the best for you and your family. Good health, happiness and prosperity. Merry Christmas and a happy new year....5 days ago
-
by ssms5411Just ordered some Toyo 315/35/17 tires for my 17x11 rims. Hopefully I can get them on the beginning of next year. Will post pics.5 days ago
Comment