Tweet
Had to bring this topic back from the dead because I want to get some louvers for my car. The problem is jcwhitney only lists em for up to 97 for the firebird/trans am but up to 01 for the camaro! Aren't all the rear windows from 93+ exactly the same?
-
2002 Black Firebird:<br />A4, Y87, W68, T-tops<br />Best NA ET: 15.16 @ 90<br /> <a href=\"http://members.cardomain.com/darksde02\" target=\"_blank\">http://members.cardomain.com/darksde02</a> -
Go to this links it the louvers u speak of for 4th gen f-bodys.. 4th gen louvers [img]graemlins/banana.gif[/img]1998 Navy Blue A4 Camaro (Sold)<br />MODS: Performance<br />Whisper airlid,K&N Filter, TSP Rumbler & Carsond cat.<br />Apperance:Xenon Airdam and clearcorners. <a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/wilkcamaro98\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.cardomain.com/id/wilkcamaro98</a><br />2002 Dodge Ram Sport Silver 4.7 v8 stock.Comment
-
Ewwww that one is pretty bulky if you ask me! It's way to thick around the edges, I'd have blind spots all over the place! I wonder if there are any other models out there more similar to the 3rd gens louvers. They were thin and went all the way across the back of the window so you could still see out of most of it. The picture on the first link here to jcwhitney is more like something I'd want but who knows what the actual model for a 4th gen would look like. Guess I could call them and ask for more info...
[ February 20, 2004, 02:50 AM: Message edited by: DARK SDE '02 ]2002 Black Firebird:<br />A4, Y87, W68, T-tops<br />Best NA ET: 15.16 @ 90<br /> <a href=\"http://members.cardomain.com/darksde02\" target=\"_blank\">http://members.cardomain.com/darksde02</a>Comment
-
i know this may seem kind of rude and i dont mean it to be but please.....in the name of everything 4th f-body. dont get those [img]graemlins/barf.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/barf.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/barf.gif[/img]Comment
-
well, to be honest, i didnt even like them on 3rd gens. they just never looked right to me. way too 80'sComment
-
[img]graemlins/barf.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/barf.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/barf.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/barf.gif[/img]<a href=\"http://community.webshots.com/user/maniacls1\" target=\"_blank\"><b>2001 Firehawk #155 of 504 -M6</b></a><br />437 RWHP / 404 RWTQ -Dynojet (heads/cam)<br />12.34 @114 mph 1.7 60\' (bolt-ons only)<br />12.47 @116 mph 2.0 60\' (street tires, heads/cam)Comment
-
i saw one a 98+ camaro with them on in like october, they really didnt look to bad at all. Idk, the one i saw had a high rise spoiler and gfx which i bet helped it.1993 Camaro 3.4L M5<br />WW F-1 GFX, WW 3-pc Spoiler, Moroso CAI, Ripper, 3\" Pacesetter Cat-Back, EGR SunGuard, Taillight Blackouts, Clear Corners, Custom Painted 3rd Brake Light & Sidemarkers,<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/member_pages/view_page.pl?page_id=384945\" target=\"_blank\">CarDomain site</a> <a href=\"http://community.webshots.com/user/grgrycamaro93-date\" target=\"_blank\">WebShots</a> <a href=\"http://www.geocities.com/grgrycamaro93/Home.html\" target=\"_blank\">Yahoo Web Site</a>Comment
-
YUCK! [img]graemlins/slap.gif[/img]_davjos81- 02 v6<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/davjos81\" target=\"_blank\">www.cardomain.com/id/davjos81 </a><br /><a href=\"http://community.webshots.com/user/davjos81\" target=\"_blank\"> <a href=\"http://community.webshots.com/user/davjos81\" target=\"_blank\">http://community.webshots.com/user/davjos81</a> </a> <br /><br />-over $8,000 invested! Too many mods to list, just check out my site!!Comment
-
Hideous... order the mud flaps while your at it.
CpComment
-
[img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/stickpoke.gif[/img]Originally posted by hou-tex-six:
order the mud flaps while your at it.
Cp\"Well, we don\'t care how bad-*** some dude\'s N/A Honda S2000 motor is; if you go up against 900+ pushrod ponies and 750 pounds of earth-shaking torque with a wrong-wheel-drive econobox, you\'re gonna get a fast and furious old-school ***-whipping.\"Comment
-
ok, well i think we've expressed how we feel.Comment
Comment