Clutch break in tips? - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Clutch break in tips?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Clutch break in tips?

    tips on break in?

    don't rev it high
    no hard shifts
    no wot :(


    ease into the clutch
    slip it
    rev up higher to start and let out slow
    heat cycles, let heat up and cool down.(not all driving in one day)


    any other ideas?
    -Eric<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/mustangeater82\" target=\"_blank\">2000 NBM V6 Camaro 5-speed</a> T-top <i>converted</i><br /><b>14.467@95.45mph</b> <i>$0 in mods</i><br /><i>The member formerly known as MustangEater8251</i>

  • #2
    sliping and reving it high will burn up and ruin your new clutch. Just drive easy and normally for 500 miles. Dont sit at a light with the clutch half way out.
    1995 3.4L M5 Camaro<br />Bullet Performance Exhaust, K&N FIPK, Stage 1 clutch, Short shifter, Hotchkis STB, Taylor Ignition wires, NGK spark plugs

    Comment


    • #3
      I was going with, rev to 2-3k then rev it out...


      not sit there and purposely slip the clutch 24/7 to break in a clutch you need to heat it up and cool it down.
      -Eric<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/mustangeater82\" target=\"_blank\">2000 NBM V6 Camaro 5-speed</a> T-top <i>converted</i><br /><b>14.467@95.45mph</b> <i>$0 in mods</i><br /><i>The member formerly known as MustangEater8251</i>

      Comment


      • #4
        I said the dont sit there at a light with the clutch out to make the point that just dont do anything stupid and ur clutch will be fine. Reving over 1500 will ruin ur new clutch. If it was my car i would use no gas or very little for 500 miles but thats just me. Im sure other people can give u better info on this.
        1995 3.4L M5 Camaro<br />Bullet Performance Exhaust, K&N FIPK, Stage 1 clutch, Short shifter, Hotchkis STB, Taylor Ignition wires, NGK spark plugs

        Comment


        • #5
          i havent been around a whole lot so i missed this, but glad to see you got it in! did you run into any probs with the install?
          <a href=\"http://cardomain.com/id/articacid\" target=\"_blank\">2002 35th Anniv. Black Camaro M5</a><br />Mods: Carsound Cat, SLP Loudmouth, Whisper Lid w/ K&N, J&M LCA\'s, ST Springs, eD Stereo(146.7 dB)<br />\'88 K1500 305 V8 Auto(Winter)

          Comment


          • #6
            hard to pull the tranny out...(screwdrivers to pry it out, pry bars woudl have helped)

            hard to pull pilot bushing, needed a slide hammer

            slightly difficult to get tranny back in.


            No other problems...
            -Eric<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/mustangeater82\" target=\"_blank\">2000 NBM V6 Camaro 5-speed</a> T-top <i>converted</i><br /><b>14.467@95.45mph</b> <i>$0 in mods</i><br /><i>The member formerly known as MustangEater8251</i>

            Comment


            • #7
              kool glad to see your really getting things together! you went with the centerforce didnt you?
              <a href=\"http://cardomain.com/id/articacid\" target=\"_blank\">2002 35th Anniv. Black Camaro M5</a><br />Mods: Carsound Cat, SLP Loudmouth, Whisper Lid w/ K&N, J&M LCA\'s, ST Springs, eD Stereo(146.7 dB)<br />\'88 K1500 305 V8 Auto(Winter)

              Comment


              • #8
                nope ended up with a spec II
                -Eric<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/mustangeater82\" target=\"_blank\">2000 NBM V6 Camaro 5-speed</a> T-top <i>converted</i><br /><b>14.467@95.45mph</b> <i>$0 in mods</i><br /><i>The member formerly known as MustangEater8251</i>

                Comment


                • #9
                  Just curious, how come you didn't go with the stage 3?
                  1994 Firebird 3.4<br />15.65 @ 86.8<br /><a href=\"http://www.funkz.net/firebird.htm\" target=\"_blank\">funkz.net/firebird</a><br /><a href=\"http://mywebpages.comcast.net/funkz/timeslips.htm\" target=\"_blank\">Timeslips</a>

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    don't really plan to make the hp that a stage I couldn't handle... yet alone a stage II or a stage III...


                    I want the closest to stock feel, its a little wierd but for the most part it turned out ok.


                    Stage II seemed decent I have heard people not be happy with the streetability of a stage III... it was eithr that or a stage IV (because it didn't have springs)
                    -Eric<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/mustangeater82\" target=\"_blank\">2000 NBM V6 Camaro 5-speed</a> T-top <i>converted</i><br /><b>14.467@95.45mph</b> <i>$0 in mods</i><br /><i>The member formerly known as MustangEater8251</i>

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Pfffft... I broke in the first centerforce for 500 miles, like a 90 year man I drove for miles and miles....
                      It shattered into a million fiberglass itchy nasty peices in less than a year.

                      The second, custom built centerforce (which is the best clutch I have ever had), I broke in MAYBE 100 miles, and it works fine.
                      1997 Chevrolet Camaro v6 - 13.8@104MPH
                      1997 Dodge Viper GTS

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I have heard the same thing... but I figure better safe then sorry... especially with my record of drivetrain problems. I have ~175 miles to go.
                        -Eric<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/mustangeater82\" target=\"_blank\">2000 NBM V6 Camaro 5-speed</a> T-top <i>converted</i><br /><b>14.467@95.45mph</b> <i>$0 in mods</i><br /><i>The member formerly known as MustangEater8251</i>

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by shenanigans:
                          Stage II seemed decent I have heard people not be happy with the streetability of a stage III... it was eithr that or a stage IV (because it didn't have springs)
                          Unhappy with the pedal effort or the way it engages? I was considering the III in case I ever decided to turbo, but this is my daily driver, so I don't want to make driving the car unpleasant.

                          Also, what do you mean by a little weird? LOL
                          1994 Firebird 3.4<br />15.65 @ 86.8<br /><a href=\"http://www.funkz.net/firebird.htm\" target=\"_blank\">funkz.net/firebird</a><br /><a href=\"http://mywebpages.comcast.net/funkz/timeslips.htm\" target=\"_blank\">Timeslips</a>

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            way it engages... I doubt pedal effort is much of a problem.

                            My pedal is SUPER light now... back in the day the car used to be super light, its well bled, I put in a new master and slave, I knew I had hydraulics issues before.

                            As for a little wierd...

                            its a little more tricky, I have a slip in the pedal feel if I need it, its a less then stock. But how I drive other cars compared to this is different, its very much all grip or all slip. There is a small small seciton of slip. But like I said, its small.

                            I was a stickler for a stock feel and I think this is manageable. I have driven stock cars that have had a pedal feel similar to this. But its not how my camaro has been in the past. [img]smile.gif[/img]
                            -Eric<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/mustangeater82\" target=\"_blank\">2000 NBM V6 Camaro 5-speed</a> T-top <i>converted</i><br /><b>14.467@95.45mph</b> <i>$0 in mods</i><br /><i>The member formerly known as MustangEater8251</i>

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Do you get any chatter? I absolutely hate chatter. And I don't want to have to rev it up and slip the clutch to prevent it from chattering. I like being able to take off from 1500rpm.
                              1994 Firebird 3.4<br />15.65 @ 86.8<br /><a href=\"http://www.funkz.net/firebird.htm\" target=\"_blank\">funkz.net/firebird</a><br /><a href=\"http://mywebpages.comcast.net/funkz/timeslips.htm\" target=\"_blank\">Timeslips</a>

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              FORUM SPONSORS

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X