Welcome to the FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
A flywheel is deisgned to help carry the crankshaft to the next stroke. Reducing its weight just makes it harder to go to the next cycle.
I don't know if it would help our cars that much. I think it's more of an import thing (small displacement, light pistons and stuff, easier to carry to the next position in the firing order).
*SOLD 9/4/05*<br />1998 Navy Blue Metallic Camaro M5<br />-Flowmaster cat back<br />-Accel Ignition<br />-K&N Air Filter<br />-Hurst Shift Knob<br /><br />Currently vehicle-less at Ohio State :(
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by 57s98Camaro:
A flywheel is deisgned to help carry the crankshaft to the next stroke. Reducing its weight just makes it harder to go to the next cycle.
I don't know if it would help our cars that much. I think it's more of an import thing (small displacement, light pistons and stuff, easier to carry to the next position in the firing order).<hr></blockquote>
just the opposit. lighter engines need heavier flywheels (reletively of course). the heavier engines, due to their mass, inherently have a greater inertial potential. which means it takes more initial energy to get them going and to slow them down. our engines should have no problem at all carrying to the next stroke even without a flywheel. they'll just be really choppy. by offering initial resistance (both to rotate and stop) the flywheel "smoothes out" the engine's torque delivery. with a lighter flywheel the engine becomes more responsive and with less rotating mass some HP is freed up too. the only real reason we have iron flywheels on our cars (even LS1s have them) is because they are cheap to produce en mass.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment