If I get a taller tire than OEM will it increase or decrease the overall gear ration? In other words, will I have a stiffer or softer gear?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Gear Ratio question
Collapse
X
-
Gear Ratio question
1993 Pontiac Firebird 3.4L V6 A4<br />F41 RPO suspension option<br />119K miles<br />Fastchip<br />K&N \"Filtercharged\"<br />Airbox cuttout CAI<br />ASP underdrive pulleys<br />Pacesetter Headers<br />Flowmaster 80 Series 2.75 cat-back<br />MangaFlow Hi-Flow Cat<br />Corvette Servo<br />16.4 @ 81 MPHTags: None
-
I think I remember someone saying somewhere that if you have a taller tire, it will equate to your final ratio being numerically lower since they will slow down your acceleration. But I'm not positive.AIM: Alientr8tr<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/583450\" target=\"_blank\">1998 Camaro 3.8L</a><br />Flowmaster 80-series, !FRA, Eibach Springs, KYB AGX, SLP sway bars, 3.42/LSD, Wings West kit, Z06 Motorsports, Silverstone Metallic paint<br /><a href=\"http://www.shift5.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Shift 5</a> - My Band
-
softer. If you had wheels that were super-swampers off of a truck you would have a gear ratio of about .5 instead of 3.42, regardless of weight.
-Justin<b><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/drkmind11\" target=\"_blank\">2000 Red Firebird Coupe, A4.</a></b> ((3.42 Gears, LSD Stock))<br />Details: 3\" Edelbrock Exhaust, 3\" Catco Cat,160* Thermostat, 8% Tint, TA Chrome Wheels, Viper 550.
Comment
-
so numerically higher = stiffer
and lower = softer??
I never knew that and was wondering if that's how that worked when he said that.AIM: Alientr8tr<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/583450\" target=\"_blank\">1998 Camaro 3.8L</a><br />Flowmaster 80-series, !FRA, Eibach Springs, KYB AGX, SLP sway bars, 3.42/LSD, Wings West kit, Z06 Motorsports, Silverstone Metallic paint<br /><a href=\"http://www.shift5.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Shift 5</a> - My Band
Comment
-
Then why do you see tractors with huge rear tires designed for pulling(torque)?1993 Pontiac Firebird 3.4L V6 A4<br />F41 RPO suspension option<br />119K miles<br />Fastchip<br />K&N \"Filtercharged\"<br />Airbox cuttout CAI<br />ASP underdrive pulleys<br />Pacesetter Headers<br />Flowmaster 80 Series 2.75 cat-back<br />MangaFlow Hi-Flow Cat<br />Corvette Servo<br />16.4 @ 81 MPH
Comment
-
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by BradC:
Then why do you see tractors with huge rear tires designed for pulling(torque)?<hr></blockquote>
think about it... if those things had really small tires they couldnt pull anything. look at it this way... put a trailer hitch on your camaro, hook it up to something heavy, and put two donuts on the rear wheels. what ar eyou goign to do? youll sit there and spin your wheels. Now put some big *** slicks on the back, and youll be doing some pulling.
[ December 08, 2003: Message edited by: Loochy88 ]</p>
Comment
-
your stock rims (16-inch) and stock tires 235-55-16, then you put some low profile tires 245-45-16 then it will be like going from let's say 3.23 to 3.42 or if you do the opposite and put tall tires such as 265-50-16 then it will be like going from 3.23 to 3.08. see it basically boils down to tire size and revolutions per distance.
Comment
-
"your stock rims (16-inch) and stock tires 235-55-16, then you put some low profile tires 245-45-16 then it will be like going from let's say 3.23 to 3.42 or if you do the opposite and put tall tires such as 265-50-16 then it will be like going from 3.23 to 3.08. see it basically boils down to tire size and revolutions per distance."
In the first case, it would be more like going to 3.73s (3.81). In the second case it would be virtually no change (3.18).
Take the profile (45,50,55) and multiply it by the width (235,245,265). Take the ratio of the two numbers that result. That's your difference.
[ December 08, 2003: Message edited by: V6Bob ]</p>2000 Firebird convert, chameleon/tan, M5, Y87, TCS, BMR tower brace and panhard, KBDD sfcs, 245/50-16 GSCs
Comment
-
... a smaller tire is going to numerically raise your gear ratio.
Numerically higher gear ratios are considered "Lower gears"
Vice versa.
Tall gears are numerically lower (high gears)
Short gears are numerically higher (low gears)<b>15.41</b> @ 89.80 & 15.45 @ <b>91.64</b>, 2.21 60ft, 3,440 raceweight, using <b>OEM</b> Equipment. <br />\'98 L67/M49 w/ 134,000 miles before spun bearing. \"<i>It\'s all stock, Baby</i>!\"
Comment
-
listen V6Bob why are having a cow? you cant argue the fact that some tires are 26 inches tall and some are 29 inches tall. it is obvious that the revolutions per distance will vary as in gear diference with the same tire. So please dont be bashing me and as for your point of view should be in trying to help the board member who asked the question and not trying to look as the all mighty by making me look uneducated.
Comment
-
I'm sorry if I offended you.
I was just trying to give the original guy some information about exactly how the effective gear ratio changes, not put you down. I didn't think I was using offensive or emotional language (having a cow?), just straight factual stuff.
But, in any event, I apologize.
[ December 09, 2003: Message edited by: V6Bob ]</p>2000 Firebird convert, chameleon/tan, M5, Y87, TCS, BMR tower brace and panhard, KBDD sfcs, 245/50-16 GSCs
Comment
Latest Topics
Collapse
-
Hey guys. For starters I’ve always been a big car guy, I love all types of cars and can appreciate all types of engineering. I’ve always been a Chevy...2 weeks ago
-
by ssms5411Getting a message saying invalid interface, haven’t used it since last year probably November. First time in 23 years I had a problem. Going to get...2 weeks ago
-
need help finding a balancer and a replacement balancer bolt. im at a lost after confusing myself researching.3 weeks ago
-
Hello every one, ozzy here ive been looking at this page for weeks now finally joined. So my question is why is it that every turbo build forum just ends...3 weeks ago
Comment