Could an L67 handle a single LARGE turbo?? - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Could an L67 handle a single LARGE turbo??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Could an L67 handle a single LARGE turbo??

    Would there be any issues with an L67 handling a single large turbo. It seems like there wouldn't be much of a problem due the stock setup for the M90.

    I don't know all the turbo lingo, but, I was thinking along the lines of the large turbo they upgrade the Supras with. I think it's the T72 turbo, not sure though.

    Also does it make sense to expect a rather large performance increase due to the turbo being more efficient than a screw-type supercharger?
    2000 GTP<br />Thrasher CAI, 3.4\" pulley, DHP PCM<br />Member RedLineVSix<br />Best ET-14.02<br />Best Trap-97.15

  • #2
    <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by John D.:
    Would there be any issues with an L67 handling a single large turbo. It seems like there wouldn't be much of a problem due the stock setup for the M90.

    I don't know all the turbo lingo, but, I was thinking along the lines of the large turbo they upgrade the Supras with. I think it's the T72 turbo, not sure though.

    Also does it make sense to expect a rather large performance increase due to the turbo being more efficient than a screw-type supercharger?
    <hr></blockquote>

    Makes sense. Should take less power to spin the turbo. With that big turbo you won't have the low end that you get with the Eaton, but the top end should make up with it. Would this turbo setup be intercooled? If so then you increase the amount of O2 that you are flowing dramatically while reducing likelihood of detonation. All in all I would say that generally the turbo would make more power. You'd just need to go through the calculations in order to select the turbo and make sure that whatever one you choose is operating eficiently, without surging, throughout the rpm range.

    Ok some of that was rambling. I think the main issue would just be lag from the large turbo, and the limit of boost that the L67 can take (but I don't know what that is).
    Matt<br />2000 Firebird<br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.fullthrottlev6.com/forums/index.php?\" target=\"_blank\">FullThrottleV6.com</a>

    Comment


    • #3
      <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by HAZ-Matt:


      Makes sense. Should take less power to spin the turbo. With that big turbo you won't have the low end that you get with the Eaton, but the top end should make up with it. Would this turbo setup be intercooled? If so then you increase the amount of O2 that you are flowing dramatically while reducing likelihood of detonation. All in all I would say that generally the turbo would make more power. You'd just need to go through the calculations in order to select the turbo and make sure that whatever one you choose is operating eficiently, without surging, throughout the rpm range.

      Ok some of that was rambling. I think the main issue would just be lag from the large turbo, and the limit of boost that the L67 can take (but I don't know what that is).
      <hr></blockquote>


      I concor! Although this particular turbo will be ill suited for the L67 except one does some major engine work and turn the L67 into a high winder. That turbo is too big...I haven't looked at the compressor map for this but lets just assume you start making useful boost at about 3500-3800 RPMs you only have about 2500 RPMs (simplification) to play with giving the fact that the stock RPM limit is 6k...in other words not enough play time. The good side: with this much lag there is so much air flow and power capabilities...although it just doesn't match the L67's stock parameters!!
      THE ORIGINAL 3800SII turbo...<b><i>NOW SERIES-III</i></b>

      Comment


      • #4
        What size turbo would be more well suited for an L67 application?
        2000 GTP<br />Thrasher CAI, 3.4\" pulley, DHP PCM<br />Member RedLineVSix<br />Best ET-14.02<br />Best Trap-97.15

        Comment


        • #5
          My guess would be a T3/T4 Hybrid.
          AIM: escalier deverre<br />\'02 Pearl Blue Metallic RSX-S (daily driver)<br />\'98 Black Firebird<br />98 V6 turbocharged to 02 LS1 swap<br />\'02 LS1/4L60E<br />LS6 Block, LS6 Intake Manifold, Thunder Racing 215/220 .600/.523/115 Cam, Titanium Retainers, Crane Double Valve Springs, 125 shot NX Wet Kit w/ NOS brand Purge, True Dual \"H\" Pipe w/ two chambers and dumps, 17x11(rear) and 17x9.5(front) Black Powdercoated ZR1 Replicas on 315 and 275 BFGoodrich Comp T/A\'s (Street)/ET Drags/Skinnies on Weldlites(Track), 3.42/LSD

          Comment


          • #6
            t4 turbo....69 turbine for easy spool...and a .8 ish compressor side.

            i guess all the talk in redlinevsix is makin you nervous [img]tongue.gif[/img]
            2011 Camaro LS 6M, in black.

            Comment


            • #7
              Take it from experience....DO NOT RUN A TURBO WITHOUT AN INTERCOOLER...just some friendly advice.
              New Car--- 2000 Trans Am M6--SLP Lid, K7N Filter, 160 degree Thermostat, Loudmouth Exhaust, Smooth bellows, MAF ends, ASP Pulley, 4.10 gears, Y2K Chrome Vette Wheels, 2\" drop.. More to Come<p>Dyno <br />325 RWHP <br />325 RWTQ<p>Cardomain Site <a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/formulao96\" target=\"_blank\">www.cardomain.com/id/formulao96</a>

              Comment


              • #8
                single set-up, a t-4 would be nice. An intercooler isn't needed if running low boost, but highly suggested if you want to run higher boost.
                <b>99\' Black Camaro SS</b> <br />M6/T-Tops - SLPLid w/K&N | Hurst Billet Plus w/ LSS | EGR Mod<p>Black 97\' Camaro T-Tops (RIP)

                Comment


                • #9
                  A GN or a TTA turbo should will work well
                  2004 Dodge Dakota 3.7 litres of raw power!!<br />Nothing but a 6!<br />Do you know for sure? John 3:18

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Formulao96:
                    Take it from experience....DO NOT RUN A TURBO WITHOUT AN INTERCOOLER...just some friendly advice.<hr></blockquote>

                    If I decide to run with this I would definately run an intercooler. I would be wasting my time pulling the M90,strapping on a turbo and only runnning a few psi of boost due to not being intercooled.

                    Thanks for the advice though
                    2000 GTP<br />Thrasher CAI, 3.4\" pulley, DHP PCM<br />Member RedLineVSix<br />Best ET-14.02<br />Best Trap-97.15

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      A T72 turbo is a solid mid-10 second turbo. It's too large a turbo for a stock motor; it really needs heads, cam and a loose converter. Also, a major fuel system upgrade will be in order to the tune of at least 55# injectors which, on the older V6s, requires the ECM be modified with new drivers to run low impedance injectors. I am currently pulling my TE62/55# injector combo in favor of a 70-series turbo and 72# injectors.

                      Regards,
                      Morgan
                      \'87 Grand National (11.08 @ 120, stock motor & heads with 159K miles and bolt ons only. UPDATE: New motor 09/01/03-- ported irons, 212/212 cam, T66 turbo, 72# inj, big front mount I/C) <br />\'99 Regal GS supercharged (14.001 @ 99 on the OEM Good\"rock\" LSs) <br />\'96 Roadmaster Limited LT-1 with some of the more popular Impala SS mods; my stealth Impala SS.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Whoever turboes their L67 and tunes it correct will have the most powerful L67 to date, that is a fact. I don't know alot about turbo sizing so I can't help you there. My dream is to due this also, but I don't have the extra cash right now.

                        DEE
                        1997 GTP(13.3@104)-Sold<br />1999 Trans Am M6

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Couldnt you run the Turbo and the Supercharger at once? I remember seeing a VW that did that a while back. It had a monster turbo and an M90 style supercharger to give it a little more kick low end due to the turbo lag. Now I realize that would take a serious motor to handle that but couldnt it be done?
                          2001 Black S10 Xtreme 4.3L A4<br />*RedLineVSix*<br />\"Throwin sparks, draggin frame\"

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Jason:
                            Couldnt you run the Turbo and the Supercharger at once? I remember seeing a VW that did that a while back. It had a monster turbo and an M90 style supercharger to give it a little more kick low end due to the turbo lag. Now I realize that would take a serious motor to handle that but couldnt it be done?<hr></blockquote>


                            There is already someone running, or is trying to run, a setup like that on a Fiero with an L67 swap. He claims 10 sec times, I think, but hasn't been able to come with any slips yet.

                            If I wanted to get crazy I could go that route, but I want to keep it really reliable and I think a single turbo would be the way to go. I am kinda hestitant to follow this due to the loss of low end torque, cause I love that grunt off the line.
                            2000 GTP<br />Thrasher CAI, 3.4\" pulley, DHP PCM<br />Member RedLineVSix<br />Best ET-14.02<br />Best Trap-97.15

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              The only way to find the best turbo is to decide what your hp goal is. Then use that to figure what psi boost you will be running. Next figure out what your max rpms will be. Then using volumetric efficiency along with the rpms and ci of the motor map the cfm (or lb/min) on compressor maps to find the best turbo for your application. There is no one correct answer, its all based upon what your appilcation is, so don't follow someone elses recommendation blindly. Buy a book and learn what is necessary for your goal.
                              1997 Red GTP Coupe<br />Borla,3\" DP,!ubend,Thrasher CAI,Magnuson(3.4\"),1.9 roller rockers,Tran. Cooler,GPS PCM,Boost+Trans. Temp gauges(in Lotek),comp harness,Blazertech 3200\'s,BBS 18\'s+Pilots,RAT rear sway bar,Powerslots+Pf Pads(all corners),KYB\'s,STB\'s,Poly bushings(mid+end),Optima Battery(yellow), Kenwood Deck+Boston Interior Speakers(Pro)+RF Sub(550 watts), GTS covers,rear red reflective Pontiac sticker(My fav.)

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              There are no results that meet this criteria.

                              FORUM SPONSORS

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X