How do people feel about supplemental injectors?

[Formulao96]

http://www.snowperformance.net/

Heres that water/methanol injection I was talking about.

[Pike]

Wow, I'm looking at that Water/methanol injection system and I'm exceptionally skeptical. After reading through what little bit of a web page they have, I wouldn't have enough information to purchase that.

I'm also a tad bit reluctant to induce an H20/methanol mixture into my engine even when it has been atomized. If you read through the FAQ they are talking about using windshield washer fluid [img]graemlins/bs.gif[/img] . I'd have to see this stuff in action, see some good reviews, and then maybe I'd start to consider it.

Either way, I'm going to start a new post with that idea and see what others think.

I do like the idea of the supplemental injectors for a 98 though. Just like John_D, I've got a 98 and its like the b@$tard year for F-bodies.

[Riles]

<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Pike:
Fascinating... I wonder if this would actually work?!?!?<hr></blockquote>


I am 99% sure that this is how I will feed my system. I'll let you guys know how it goes (probably not for another few months, though)

[nocutt]

<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by MoreThanAV6:
As long as it always works and you can tune it right, it doesnt matter if fuel is added by a wet sponge.<hr></blockquote>

LOL!! :D you made my day...
Adding extra injectors seems to look "old school" and cheaper but considering the results I beg to differ. There are several ways for fuel enrichment during boost. I tried two ways and have been enjoying the last one for the past 1 yr or so. I tried using 30 lb injectors with an ARC II module by www.splitsec.com (basically a MAF recalibrator)...I did not like the results due to several issues including end-user (aka me)...It worked but I found myself always having to tune it to accomodate altitude, weather...etc. I now use the unit for a regrind and LT1 maf sensor. The other thing I tried was an FMU...well not much success I was always loading my poor engine with fuel, plus it was just too unpredictable. I currently am using two extra 42 lb injectors about 16" away from the TB. This is completely programmable and the unit comes with an electronic boost controller option, retard option and RPM sensitive option. My IAT's (close to TB)is usually low due to the atomize fuel, in other words you see a little timing advance. You can let fuel come in anyway you want it...the good thing is that you can actually plot a table where fuel and retard interplay with boost as a third parameter...can we all say 3-D!
It is a Turbolink by link electrosystems...
There is a final option that supercedes all this and that is a reprogram...problem though is for every big mod you will have to go back, at the end of the day...I am sure we are talking more $$$$$...

[ December 12, 2002: Message edited by: nocutt ]</p>