Welcome to the FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I got thinking about this now that I live in Salt Lake. I saw a WRX driving by, and I thought: "I know that a WRX would beat me by a good few lenghts, but I wonder if I would have a better chance in the mountains?"
Now, I am guessing that both of our cars would be hurt by altitude just the same, but would an NA or a Forced Induction car have an advantage in the mountains as opposed to sea level?
Forced induction is much better in higher altitude. Regardless of what O2 percentage is in the air. Yes he's not going to see the same gains he would at sea level, but neither are you. You both would would be hurt proportionately to that atmosphere in which you are driving in.
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Pike: Forced induction is much better in higher altitude. Regardless of what O2 percentage is in the air. Yes he's not going to see the same gains he would at sea level, but neither are you. You both would would be hurt proportionately to that atmosphere in which you are driving in.<hr></blockquote>
Remember depending on how boost is actuated...the wastegate will still open up at the desired level of boost espeically on a turbo...therfore if the car is set at 9 psi, the turbo will still provide the engine with that amount of psi...granted not with the same amount of CFM @ sea level...but look at the bigger picture, an N/A engine will be starving :(
THE ORIGINAL 3800SII turbo...<b><i>NOW SERIES-III</i></b>
just think of it like this...
2 NA engines
then slap on a turbo on one of the engines...
the turbo will help out the engine no matter what, thus giving the turboed car an advantage no matter what.
Yeah SLC sucks. WE have high altitude. NA cars suffer. JUstin, I have heard from my Buick Grand National friends that Turbo cars dont lose as much as an NA car or even as much as a supercharger car. Thats why I am getting a Turbo.
Superchargers were originally used on aircraft engines so that they could fly at higher altitudes -- they needed more air because it was thinner.
All engines lose power from thinner as altitude increases, probably even the WRX. But he could turn up his boost to compensate, while you, umm, shift.
-Rob
So my truck is finally getting some work done, after 17 years, Oil pressure sensor went out and it’s located under the lower intake manifold. Have to...
2 weeks ago
FORUM SPONSORS
Collapse
Working...
X
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment