e-ram vs slp cai... - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

e-ram vs slp cai...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • e-ram vs slp cai...

    im now lookin into induction systems and now i have it down to these 2. i need some opinions. Thanx
    <b> \'95 Camaro 3.4L A4 <i>Rikku</i><br />AutoX - Drift - Street </b><br />\"Sideways is faster.\"

  • #2
    there's a lot that can go wrong w/ the e-ram. just stick w/ the slp cold air intake or ftra. if you ever want to get a sc kit from ati, these will be able to work w/ the system, unlike the e-ram.
    2001 Arctic White Firebird<br />T-Tops, 3.42 rear gear stock<br />Mods:K&N Air Filter,Whisper Air Induction Lid, maf screen removed, raised air box, Kumho Ecsta 712 255-50-ZR16 tires, BMR stb<br />Mods not installed yet: FTRA, SLP Lsd/Differential cover<br />Near Future Mods: HPP3, GMMG 3\" Exhaust , 1LE Swaybars, Transgo Shift Kit, MSD-DIS-4 w/ Accel Coil-Packs, Turquoise Blue Neon Underbody Kit, BMR Adj. LCA\'s, G2 Sfc\'s & V-braces, Pacesetter headers

    Comment


    • #3
      the only thing is that im runnin a 3.4L and theres not alot of forced induction available for my engine.
      <b> \'95 Camaro 3.4L A4 <i>Rikku</i><br />AutoX - Drift - Street </b><br />\"Sideways is faster.\"

      Comment


      • #4
        There are some 3.4 guys who have successfully put on a turbo in there cars, and Teal said they are gonna be workin on a supercharger system for the 3.4's real soon.

        I wouldn't bother with some e-ram crap. I would stick with a CAI if anything.
        <b>99\' Black Camaro SS</b> <br />M6/T-Tops - SLPLid w/K&N | Hurst Billet Plus w/ LSS | EGR Mod<p>Black 97\' Camaro T-Tops (RIP)

        Comment


        • #5
          <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by daWhoady:
          There are some 3.4 guys who have successfully put on a turbo in there cars, and Teal said they are gonna be workin on a supercharger system for the 3.4's real soon.

          I wouldn't bother with some e-ram crap. I would stick with a CAI if anything.
          <hr></blockquote>

          There are several working on designing turbo setups for the 3.4L including me. At least one person is going to offer the tubing and custom manifolds as a kit. I'm designing a setup now that, once I finish it, I'm going to draw up schematics in a CAD program and offer it for download.

          Comment


          • #6
            sounds good. let me know if u need support.
            <b> \'95 Camaro 3.4L A4 <i>Rikku</i><br />AutoX - Drift - Street </b><br />\"Sideways is faster.\"

            Comment


            • #7
              <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Patrick Javert:
              there's a lot that can go wrong w/ the e-ram. just stick w/ the slp cold air intake or ftra. if you ever want to get a sc kit from ati, these will be able to work w/ the system, unlike the e-ram.<hr></blockquote>

              The guy who created and sells e-ram lives only 15 miles away from me. He's pretty much has shown me that e-ram is pretty flexible. It can be installed along with turbos and superchargers. It's all how you duct it. He has several protocol cars that has turbos. In my opinion it is worth the investment.

              1998 Firebird . 1989 Firebird XS . 1986 Fiero GT

              Comment

              Latest Topics

              Collapse

              There are no results that meet this criteria.

              FORUM SPONSORS

              Collapse
              Working...
              X