turbo or supercharger? - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

turbo or supercharger?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • turbo or supercharger?

    which do u guys feel gives more power, a supercharger or a turbo?
    1985 S-10 w/ 3.4 engine, edelbrock intake manifold w/ 4barrel 500 cfm carb, k&n air cleaner, single glass pack Y\'s into 2-2 foot 3.5\" \"boom tubes\"...very loud

  • #2
    Turbo..
    Jeff ..
    1998 Firebird.. Built 3.8 with a 125 shot.. 370rwhp,415rwtq.. stock tune!! sold

    2002 WS6 T/A.. Bolt ins..448rwhp
    2009 G8 GT.. Vararam intake, GXP axleback
    1998 Corvette.. Vararam intake, Ti axleback
    http://www.fquick.com/slow-v6

    Comment


    • #3
      how much difference does the turbo make, like as far as quarter mile times and the such?
      1985 S-10 w/ 3.4 engine, edelbrock intake manifold w/ 4barrel 500 cfm carb, k&n air cleaner, single glass pack Y\'s into 2-2 foot 3.5\" \"boom tubes\"...very loud

      Comment


      • #4
        quite a bit..considering it doesnt rob power to make power
        96 Camaro M5. Dark metallic gree (?dont know the offical color name)<br />Home made Intake :: Headers, 3inch headers back to Flowmaster muffler :: spec stage 3 clutch Now installed, waiting for 3.42\'s and LSD next month<br /><a href=\"http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/RiceEatingCamaro/?action=view&current=newcar.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">My Car</a> <br /><br />Totalled Car.<br /><a href=\"http://bellsouthpwp.net/s/k/sk8er305/\" target=\"_blank\">96 CamaroRS</a>

        Comment


        • #5
          Turbo is the way to go. The way I see it, since it makes it with RPM's, you won't have the traction issues you will with a super, and you will get more overall power.

          -Justin
          <b><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/drkmind11\" target=\"_blank\">2000 Red Firebird Coupe, A4.</a></b> ((3.42 Gears, LSD Stock))<br />Details: 3\" Edelbrock Exhaust, 3\" Catco Cat,160* Thermostat, 8% Tint, TA Chrome Wheels, Viper 550.

          Comment


          • #6
            <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Justin Kirkham:
            Turbo is the way to go. The way I see it, since it makes it with RPM's, you won't have the traction issues you will with a super, and you will get more overall power.

            <hr></blockquote>

            You will have traction issues with a turbo but it is easier to manage...and it isn't exactly RPM dependent, rather load dependent...I definately agree a turbo is the way to go...although an SC will provide more competition. Let's see a turbo produce a flat "pancake" curve :D
            THE ORIGINAL 3800SII turbo...<b><i>NOW SERIES-III</i></b>

            Comment


            • #7
              The bad thing about a turbo is the lag.. Thats when TT setups come into effect.. but yeah a turbo runs off the exaust and not the belts so it doesnt take away Hp like SC do..
              Jeff ..
              1998 Firebird.. Built 3.8 with a 125 shot.. 370rwhp,415rwtq.. stock tune!! sold

              2002 WS6 T/A.. Bolt ins..448rwhp
              2009 G8 GT.. Vararam intake, GXP axleback
              1998 Corvette.. Vararam intake, Ti axleback
              http://www.fquick.com/slow-v6

              Comment


              • #8
                do u have to do much modification to your engine, other than the exhaust manifolds?
                1985 S-10 w/ 3.4 engine, edelbrock intake manifold w/ 4barrel 500 cfm carb, k&n air cleaner, single glass pack Y\'s into 2-2 foot 3.5\" \"boom tubes\"...very loud

                Comment


                • #9
                  <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by 1998silverbird:
                  The bad thing about a turbo is the lag.. Thats when TT setups come into effect.. but yeah a turbo runs off the exaust and not the belts so it doesnt take away Hp like SC do..<hr></blockquote>

                  "Turbo Lag" is overated...with a properly sized turbo you really don't feel the lag especially with the CR of a stock 3800!! TT's are things of the past...well except one who has the $$$ to cough up, but by design a 3800 Fbody will do a lot of damage especially now that we know the capabilities of the L36!
                  THE ORIGINAL 3800SII turbo...<b><i>NOW SERIES-III</i></b>

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by nocutt:


                    "Turbo Lag" is overated...with a properly sized turbo you really don't feel the lag especially with the CR of a stock 3800!! TT's are things of the past...well except one who has the $$$ to cough up, but by design a 3800 Fbody will do a lot of damage especially now that we know the capabilities of the L36!
                    <hr></blockquote>

                    So is parasitic lost over rated for SC. I mean could easily spin my pulley and it will make a couple of revolution. Just remember, they have the same function, its all about air flow.

                    Where are you at in LA, nocutt? I sure would like to check out your car.

                    But as far as Turbo Vs. Supercharger goes, here you go: www.superchargersonline.com/content.asp?ID=19
                    ;)

                    [ April 24, 2003: Message edited by: Mighty Thor ]</p>

                    1998 Firebird . 1989 Firebird XS . 1986 Fiero GT

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Mighty Thor:


                      So is parasitic lost over rated for SC. I mean could easily spin my pulley and it will make a couple of revolution. Just remember, they have the same function, its all about air flow.

                      Where are you at in LA, nocutt? I sure would like to check out your car.

                      <hr></blockquote>

                      Well the problem with the SC is somewhat overated in a manner of speaking. So we don't go overboard, I think both poweradders have their own merits...you want Ummph now you get an SC, you want Ummph at the top-end, then you get a turbo...although a turbo does do it with style ;)

                      BTW I am in LA,LA...but I frequent Marina del Rey, mostly in my buddy's Shop...you need to comedown and see the light...literally :D
                      THE ORIGINAL 3800SII turbo...<b><i>NOW SERIES-III</i></b>

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Tyler:
                        quite a bit..considering it doesnt rob power to make power<hr></blockquote>

                        You're wrong. It does rob some power, but not as much as a SC will. And also the myth that SC's rob hundreds of HP is wrong. Today's centrifugal SC's don't produce that much parasistic loss. Personally, turbo is the way to go.
                        ---<br />-\'95 3.4L M5 Camaro

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          any times on your turbo!? numbers?
                          \'96 <b>Quasar Blue</b> Firebird A4<br /><a href=\"http://jamiethekiller@comcast.net\" target=\"_blank\"><i>jamiethekiller@comcast.net</i></a><br /><a href=\"http://www.woodlandrock.com\" target=\"_blank\">my band: woodland</a>

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by jamie:
                            any times on your turbo!? numbers?<hr></blockquote>

                            First and only time at the track (LACR) I pulled a 14.4s @ 95.xx mph with 4psi and -17 degrees of KR (bad auxillary injector), I also pulled a 14.7 @ 95.xxmph on the second run (shifted to 4th...KR was almost hitting -19 degree of KR even before 4900RPMs..I got off the throttle, I love my engine...lol). Third run was 13.7 (red light) and my last run was 17.x seconds...lol @ 11psi...yep I blew my TB intake. I have never gone back due to time constrait and can't seem to find folks to go at the right time... :(
                            THE ORIGINAL 3800SII turbo...<b><i>NOW SERIES-III</i></b>

                            Comment

                            Latest Topics

                            Collapse

                            FORUM SPONSORS

                            Collapse
                            Working...
                            X