Tweet
ok well...i was still thinking of the idea of turboing my car,and well...i never heard of anyone twin turboing a firebird,just wondering what everyones opinion on it is.
-
-
Most people's opinions are that a single turbo setup is more cost effective and less of a PITA. Search about the topic, you'll find long debates.Black \'94 Trans Am A4- SLP CAI & Loudmouth<br />Red \'93 Firebird A4- Ram Air under the WS6 hood, !cat, exhaust. -
single turbos are cheaper, but i think twin turbos are easier to design, i could be wrong.1995 Bluish green 3.4l Camaro.<br />Bone stock right now lol!<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2042355\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2042355</a>Comment
-
Imagine a single turbo setup, doubled. Not easier really.Originally posted by lambo101:
single turbos are cheaper, but i think twin turbos are easier to design, i could be wrong.Black \'94 Trans Am A4- SLP CAI & Loudmouth<br />Red \'93 Firebird A4- Ram Air under the WS6 hood, !cat, exhaust.Comment
-
yeah, basically, you'd have to do about twice the work and then some cuz you'd have to get them to synchronize. you dont wanna be running 4psi in one bank and 7 in the other. plus, you have to take into consideration space. we dont have a whole lotta space around the engine and you also have to make sure you get the thing intercooled too, cuz w/o it you pretty much defeat the purpose of having a turbo in the first place. really, stick with one turbo in my opinion.2000 3.8L Camaro A4 Pewter Y87<br />K&N Filter, SLP Ram Air kit, Eibach Pro Kit, Flowmaster 80 series, Silverstars, NGK plugs and MSD Super Conductor Wires, Electric Water PumpComment
-
One thing i know of TT is that you can set up the turbo's to spool differently. Meaning 7 psi from one turbo kicks in, then higher up in the rpm range the other turbo kicks in. I don't know how this works to the fullest extent, but i've heard the BOVs on a TT supra go seperatly and it sounded sweetOriginally posted by Camaro Dom:
yeah, basically, you'd have to do about twice the work and then some cuz you'd have to get them to synchronize. you dont wanna be running 4psi in one bank and 7 in the other. plus, you have to take into consideration space. we dont have a whole lotta space around the engine and you also have to make sure you get the thing intercooled too, cuz w/o it you pretty much defeat the purpose of having a turbo in the first place. really, stick with one turbo in my opinion.Black \'94 Trans Am A4- SLP CAI & Loudmouth<br />Red \'93 Firebird A4- Ram Air under the WS6 hood, !cat, exhaust.Comment
-
so...it is possible on our cars to do a TT setup?Comment
-
Yeah it is possible, but its not really the most efficient.Black \'94 Trans Am A4- SLP CAI & Loudmouth<br />Red \'93 Firebird A4- Ram Air under the WS6 hood, !cat, exhaust.Comment
-
Isnt that sequential turbo then?... when you have two turbo's (one smaller, one larger). The smaller one spools up quicker reducing turbo lag (which i heard is pretty bad if you turbo an F-Body... is that true?). the Second bigger one takes over in the higher RPM range to provide more boost than the smaller one could. Don't know if i am completely acurate or not so if anyone else has more info please add or correct me. I am lookin to rebuild my 3800 II and want to turbo [img]graemlins/naughty.gif[/img] unless there is a NOTICABLE lag.Comment
-
the problem with twin turbos is that you'd have to run significantly smaller turbos. You'd have to run one off each side of the engine. That means each one is only using 3 cylinders to try to make boost.Comment
-
Parallel twin turbos(same size) do not really offer a advantage over one bigger turbo, just more parts. Sequential twin turbos(different sizes) are good for road course racing but are very difficult to build.
Lag on the 3800 is what you make it. Everyone building kits are putting big turbos on. If you dont want any lag, put a smaller turbo on. You can build a turbo system to make power wherever you want. If you put a small turbo on, it will make power down low, but will suffer power up top. If you put a big turbo, you will have no low end power with lots of lag, but will make lots of power up top.92 S10 3800 A4(96)<br />1/4: 14.374 @ 92.25 w/ 1.976 60\'<br />Turbo and 12\'s Coming Soon!Comment
-
I don't think there really is an advantage to TT. Alot of Supra, 300zx and 3000GT owners are ditching the TT in favor of a big single turbo.
1998 Firebird . 1989 Firebird XS . 1986 Fiero GTComment
-
ok,so if i did a twin turbo setup,its...really not worth it cuz its not gonna make it any faster? and i wanted to set it up for drag,so if anything goes wrong,i have another vehicle i can drive.im just looking for something no one really has...Comment
-
ok...well i was thinking if i could get the kit from force fed fabrications..ide order it,but i have no idea how to get ahold of it? heres the link-http://www.force-fed-fabrications.com/Comment
-
tiago is out of kits......... he dont have them any more..... he will make you one if you take him your car.Originally posted by stktrtlewthbenie:
ok...well i was thinking if i could get the kit from force fed fabrications..ide order it,but i have no idea how to get ahold of it? heres the link-http://www.force-fed-fabrications.com/
that or look for a used one on the boardswww.turbov6camaro.com
1997 3800 Series II Camaro
4600 Stall for my ride to the mall :chug:
7.18 @ 99.77 1/8 -1.8x sixty (current quickest v6 fbod)
11.23 @ unk 5 1/4 - 7.19 1/8 - 1.83 sixty
Comment
Comment