7psi numbers are in!!! WHOOHOO! I AM HAPPY! LINKS WITH PICS HAVE BEEN ADDED - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

7psi numbers are in!!! WHOOHOO! I AM HAPPY! LINKS WITH PICS HAVE BEEN ADDED

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by TOBY:
    So answer 4me this...If Batmans kit is proto-type and yours is too, what is your disfuction with the welder? I hope to GOD to pay someone else to build it cause you guys can't even squirt gun weld :eek: <hr></blockquote>

    how old are you?

    hybrid - \'\'hI-br&d - The offspring of a cross between species.
    Co-Founder West Coast F-Bodies
    West Coast F-Bodies Car Club - WCFB Message Board

    Comment


    • #77
      <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by TOBY:

      ..Whats all this bs about running your M5 in 3rd??? Are you saying your hitting the 105MPH speed limiter at 4th gear??? I find that hard to believe so prove me wrong. Why don;t you run it in 4th like its supposed to be and give us some real numbers and not some hot air from those ballooned numbers you gave us...
      <hr></blockquote>

      i believe him. evertime i dyno my car the guy can only take it as high as 5200 rpm before my speed governor kicks in. i only have 170 rwhp and im N/A. &lt;-- 1994 3.4L. so...guess thats three people having the same problem..maybe we are all delusional...nah..its just you.

      -R

      hybrid - \'\'hI-br&d - The offspring of a cross between species.
      Co-Founder West Coast F-Bodies
      West Coast F-Bodies Car Club - WCFB Message Board

      Comment


      • #78
        Its been said before I did not come into this thread to say " my turbo is better then your SC".

        however since I was attacked I had to defend myself. It was not about competition.

        The only thing I wanted to say is that I really expected it to put down more. THats all.

        Comment


        • #79
          All i have to say is that this thread has grown in less than 24 hrs to half the size of 98GREENGLOW's thread that has been open for weeks [img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img]

          You all need to calm down. Honestly, to each his own. I am just happy there are options out there for everyone now. Well, hey, if you all want a turbo kit, then its all good. If you All want a SC kit, well there are options there too. Either way its going to cost you a couple grand to do it. I for one when this is all done and said will be driving around in a supercharged batmobile with 10psi and be looking to the next stage (a complete engine rebuild with the intent to run more bost). My goal is to get to those 11s before James does [img]tongue.gif[/img]
          - Ryan<br /> A.K.A BATMAN<br /> \"Be part of the solution...<br /> Not the problem\"

          Comment


          • #80
            <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Tiago:
            well, I don't know how any of you people are actually happy with that result, even at 7 psi. Maybe its just me but Im highly dissapointed. I expected this kit to solidly put down numbers to challange my turbo, so far you are quite a ways behind. :( <hr></blockquote>

            you're not trying to say your turbo is better? this is your first post and what seems to be the first post to start dragging this thread down. how else are we supposed to take this? was this a congratulatory post? i wish you woulda posted this at least on a new thread. i respect what both you and stefan are trying to do for the v6 community but both of you come on saying how much better and cheaper your kits are. i've talked to stefan before and he's a above average intelligence guy who i respect and tiago(you seem pretty smart) i've never talked to you personally but i wish both of you would have went about this differently. doesn't seem like either of you can just be happy for the guy. :( [img]graemlins/thumbsdown.gif[/img]

            personal feelings aside congrats to all three of you for doing something for the v6 community.
            i was swimming in the carribean. animals were hiding behind the rocks except for the little fish, but they told me the squid\'s trying to talk to me. oink, oink. where is my mind?

            Comment


            • #81
              Just to give you all something to ponder as all these Power adder options start to come out.

              Mustang

              Current model factory specs-
              Mustang: 3.8 ohv V6- 190 hp @5250 rpm / 220 lbs. torque @2750 rpm
              Mustang: GT- 4.6 ohc V8- 260 hp @5250 rpm /300 lbs. trq @ 5250 rpm
              Cobra: 4.6 DOHC V8- 320 hp @6000 rpm /315 lbs. torque @ 4750 rpm

              1996-1998
              3.8 ohv 190 hp / 215 lbs.-ft torque
              4.6 ohc V8 215 hp / 285 lbs-ft. torque
              4.6 dohc V8 305 hp / 300 lbs-ft. torque (Cobra)

              1994-1995
              GT- 200 hp@4000 rpm / 275 lbs.-ft torque @3000 rpm
              Cobra - 5.0 liter 245 hp @4800 rpm / 285 lbs.-ft @4000 rpm

              1993
              Mustang LX- 205 hp @4200 rpm / 275 lbs.-ft torque @3000 rpm
              Mustang GT- 205 hp @4200 rpm / 275 lbs.-ft torque @3000 rpm
              Mustang Cobra- 235 hp @4600 rpm / 300 lbs.-ft torque @3200 rpm

              1987-1992
              Mustang GT- 5.0 liter 225 hp @4200 300 lbs.-ft torque @3200 rpm

              Thunderbird

              Final model factory specs
              3.8 liter - 145 hp @4000 rpm / 215 lbs.-ft torque @2750 rpm (6 cyl)
              4.6 liter - 205 hp @4250 rpm / 280 lbs.-ft torque @3000 rpm

              1994-1995
              3.8 liter - 140 hp / 230 lbs.-ft torque (6 cyl)
              3.8 liter supercharged - 230 hp / 330 lbs.-ft torque (6 cyl)

              1993
              3.8 liter - 140 hp / 230 lbs.-ft torque (6 cyl)
              3.8 liter supercharged - 215 hp / 315 lbs.-ft torque (6 cyl)

              1992
              3.8 liter - 140 hp / 215 lbs.-ft torque (6 cyl)
              3.8 liter supercharged - 210 hp / 315 lbs.-ft torque (6 cyl)
              5.0 - 200 hp / 275 lbs.-ft torque

              1993-1995
              5.0 liter OHC V8- 190 hp @4250 rpm / 260 lbs.-ft torque @3250 rpm

              Firebird
              Current model factory specs (1998-2001)
              Firebird - 200 hp @5200/ 225 lbs. torque @4000 rpm
              TransAm- 305 hp @5200 rpm / 335 lbs. torque @4000 rpm (LS1)
              Firehawk 330 hp @5200 rpm / 345 lbs. torque @4400 rpm (LS1)

              1996-1997 (dual cat)
              Firebird - 200 hp @5200/ 225 lbs. torque @4000 rpm
              TransAm- 285 hp @5000 rpm / 325 lbs. torque @2500 rpm (LT1)
              Firehawk 305 hp @5000 rpm / 335 lbs. torque @2500 rpm (LT1)

              1993-1995
              Firebird 3.4 liter - 160 hp / 200 lbs. torque (6cyl.)
              TransAm- 275 hp @5000 rpm / 325 lbs. torque @2400 rpm (LT1)
              Firehawk 305 hp @5000 rpm / 335 lbs. torque @2400 rpm (LT1)

              1991-1992
              3.1 liter MPFI- 140 hp / 180 lbs.-ft torque (6yl)
              5.0 liter MPFI- 210hp / 285 lbs.-ft torque
              25 th Anniversary L98 (350ci)

              1990
              3.1 liter MPFI- 140 hp / 180 lbs.-ft torque (6yl)
              5.0 liter EFI- 170hp / 255 lbs.-ft torque
              5.0 liter MPFI- 205hp / 285 lbs.-ft torque

              Camaros
              Camaro /3.8 liter - 200 hp @5200/ 225 lbs. torque @4000 rpm
              Camaro Z28- 305 hp @5200 rpm / 335 lbs. torque @4000 rpm (LS1)
              Camaro SS 325 hp @5200 rpm / 345 lbs. torque @4400 rpm (LS1)
              1996-1997 (dual cat)

              Camaro 3.8 liter - 200 hp @5200/ 225 lbs. torque @4000 rpm
              Camaro Z28- 285 hp @5000 rpm / 325 lbs. torque @2500 rpm (LT1)
              Camaro SS 305 hp @5000 rpm / 335 lbs. torque @2500 rpm (LT1)

              1993-1995
              Camaro 3.4 liter - 160 hp / 200 lbs. torque (6cyl.)
              Camaro Z28- 275 hp @5000 rpm / 325 lbs. torque @2400 rpm (LT1)
              Camaro SS 305 hp @5000 rpm / 335 lbs. torque @2400 rpm (LT1)

              1991-1992
              3.1 liter MPFI- 140 hp / 180 lbs.-ft torque (6yl)
              5.0 liter MPFI- 210hp / 285 lbs.-ft torque
              25 th Anniversary L98 (350ci) - Only 3038 Camaros had the L98 in '92

              1990
              3.1 liter MPFI- 140 hp / 180 lbs.-ft torque (6yl)
              5.0 liter EFI- 170hp / 255 lbs.-ft torque
              5.0 liter MPFI- 205hp / 285 lbs.-ft torque

              Corvettes
              Current model factory specs 2002-2003
              C5- LS1 V8 - 345 hp @ 5600 rpm/350 pounds of torque @4400 rpm
              ZO6- LS6 V8 - 405 hp @ 6000 rpm/400 pounds of torque @4800 rpm

              1997-2001
              C5- LS1 V8 - 345 hp @ 5600 rpm/350 pounds of torque @4400 rpm
              ZO6- LS6 V8 - 385 hp @ 6000 rpm/385 pounds of torque @4800 rpm ('01 ONLY

              1996
              5.7 liter SEFI- 300-hp @5500 rpm / 340 lbs.-ft torque @4400 (LT1)
              GS- 5.7 liter SEFI- 330-hp @5800 rpm / 340 lbs.-ft torque @4500 (LT4)

              1993-1995
              5.7 liter SEFI- 300-hp @5500 rpm / 340 lbs.-ft torque @4400 (LT1)
              5.7 liter 405-hp / 425 lbs.-ft torque (ZR-1 )

              1992
              5.7 liter - 275-hp @5600 rpm / 330 lbs.-ft torque @4400 (LT1)
              5.7 liter 375-hp / 385 lbs.-ft torque (ZR-1)

              1990-1991
              5.7 liter TPFI- 245-hp @5600 rpm / 345 lbs.-ft torque @4400 (LT1)
              5.7 liter 375-hp / 385 lbs.-ft torque (ZR-1)

              Viper
              Current model factory specs - 2000-2001
              8.0 liter V10 - 450 hp @5200 rpm / 490 lbs.-ft trq at 3700 rpm
              8.0 liter V10 - 460 hp @5200 rpm / 500 lbs.-ft trq at 3,700 rpm (ACR)

              1997-1999
              8.0 liter V10 - 450 hp @5200 rpm / 490 lbs.-trq at 3700 rpm (GTS / RT)

              1996
              8.0 liter V10 - 415 hp / 488 lbs.-ft torque (RT/10)
              8.0 liter V10 - 450 hp @5200 rpm / 490 lbs.-ft trq at 3700 rpm (GTS)

              1992-1995
              8.0 liter V10 - 400 hp / 480 lbs.-ft torque (RT/10)

              [ June 05, 2003: Message edited by: BATMAN ]</p>
              - Ryan<br /> A.K.A BATMAN<br /> \"Be part of the solution...<br /> Not the problem\"

              Comment


              • #82
                <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Deuce Bigs:


                you're not trying to say your turbo is better? this is your first post and what seems to be the first post to start dragging this thread down. how else are we supposed to take this? was this a congratulatory post? i wish you woulda posted this at least on a new thread. i respect what both you and stefan are trying to do for the v6 community but both of you come on saying how much better and cheaper your kits are. i've talked to stefan before and he's a above average intelligence guy who i respect and tiago(you seem pretty smart) i've never talked to you personally but i wish both of you would have went about this differently. doesn't seem like either of you can just be happy for the guy. :( [img]graemlins/thumbsdown.gif[/img]

                personal feelings aside congrats to all three of you for doing something for the v6 community.
                <hr></blockquote>


                I never attacked batman, I just expressed my dissapointment, I truly expected more.

                When people started attacking and actually comparing us two then it took a whole different course, I said to start another thread for that discussion, but noone did, I just protected myself replying to all the posts related to me.

                Comment


                • #83
                  <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Tiago:
                  [QB]Its been said before I did not come into this thread to say " my turbo is better then your SC".
                  QB]<hr></blockquote>

                  i didn't say you were attacking him my post was meant towards this one
                  i was swimming in the carribean. animals were hiding behind the rocks except for the little fish, but they told me the squid\'s trying to talk to me. oink, oink. where is my mind?

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by v6maro:


                    True that to the MAXX

                    I'm glad I got my LS1, slap a cam, lid, and exhaust on, spending maybe 2k, and I'll be kicking every v6's *** around, not to mention my payment and insurance only went up like 100/mo!
                    -Steve
                    <hr></blockquote>

                    Man, reminds me of what most V6 guys hear ALL the time, but the sad thing is that its coming from a guy who had a v6 car to start with. I myself bought a V8, but I don't plan on dissing any V6 guys. I still like to see what the V6's are capable of.

                    As for BATMAN's kit. I'm sure we will learn more once the beta testers get their kits. With one car, its hard to tell. Good luck to all. [img]graemlins/thumbsup.gif[/img]
                    <b>Matt</b><br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/member_pages/view_page.pl?page_id=377225&page=1\" target=\"_blank\">\'96 Camaro Z28 M6</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/member_pages/view_page.pl?page_id=377225&page=3\" target=\"_blank\">\'96 Camaro M5</a>

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      The dyno #'s show potential... need to spin a little higher to see how it does but for 7PSI that's not bad at all really... a few tweaks here and there and you could up it I'm sure...

                      But I really think the selling price needs to come down a little bit to be more affordable.
                      Keith - Chicago<br /><a href=\"http://www.hptuners.com\" target=\"_blank\">HP Tuners - PCM Reprogramming</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.dxsoftware.com/magnus/\" target=\"_blank\">97 Firebird V6 to LS1 swap</a><br /><b>V8 9.967@132.78</b> 1.322 60\' NA Heads/Cam<br /><b>V8 10.295@128.48</b> 1.363 60\' NA Cam Only<br /><b>V8 10.987@119.31</b> 1.422 60\' NA Stock Internals<br /><b>V6 13.674@98.22</b> NA<br /><b>V6 12.394@104.91</b> N20 100HP

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Amped96:


                        Man, reminds me of what most V6 guys hear ALL the time, but the sad thing is that its coming from a guy who had a v6 car to start with. I myself bought a V8, but I don't plan on dissing any V6 guys. I still like to see what the V6's are capable of.

                        As for BATMAN's kit. I'm sure we will learn more once the beta testers get their kits. With one car, its hard to tell. Good luck to all. [img]graemlins/thumbsup.gif[/img]
                        <hr></blockquote>

                        Well, I saw the potential of a v6, and now I see the v8, v8 mods are soooooo much more worth the $
                        -Steve

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          I think it is kinda ****ty that Jason got banned from the board considering he was the only one that was standing up for BATMAN. I personally like the turbos but i am pleased with Batmans numbers. Just kinds stupid to come in here and be like i got complaints about u jason and i forgot and ohh well thanx for the reminder you are banned. That is child like. He has times where he shouldnt say things but for once he was doing the right thing and he gets punished do that to a dog and he will S_hit on the rug everyday cause u beat him when he did it outside.
                          <b><a href=\"http://www.sick-sixx.com\" target=\"_blank\">SICK-SIXX MEMBER</a></b><br />NA 14.345 with a 1.863 60 foot<br />Nitrous 13.03@99.5 with a 1.63 60 foot<br /><br />2000 Camaro 3.8L A4: USE TO HAVE Comp Cam 210/220 .535/.547 113lsa 111 I/C, Port and Polished Heads, NX Wet Kit 100 Shot, CPRA made by CP, RK Sport Headers

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            it is rather ironic that all the posts before jason has said things about the kit that he should not have said and was not banned then, but ryan and jason settled their differences in the sick-sixx forum and jason comes in and stands up for ryan and his kit then he gets banned. maybe his bad views on the kit before were parallel with someone elses but since jason changed his views on the kit and maybe went against that same persons thoughts on the kit and thats why he was banned?

                            [ June 05, 2003: Message edited by: hawgs ]</p>

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              yeah, it is kinda odd that he was supporting the kit, which did not share the same view as some others, then he gets banned. Hell, I don't get along with him, but he shouldn't have been banned for that.
                              -Steve

                              p.s. why did someone delete my post? was it not nice?

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by xjarayax:
                                Price is not an arguement? If price didn't matter none of us would be driving a V6 in the first place- I can guarentee that.<hr></blockquote>

                                I stopped reading up to this post, I gotta go...

                                honestly I read something about someone wanting to spend more money and have security, but the price is getting up there with v8 swaps and what not. Ohh well I am still impressed with noth numbers, I like the turbo setup better, in some respects(power, efficiency), but the Supercharger does have a warranty and what not.

                                Comment

                                Latest Topics

                                Collapse

                                FORUM SPONSORS

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X