0-60 5.8 1/4 13.682 @ 86.68

[nwilson44]

Well guys I did a run with my GPS based application in my car and Came away with some really good numbers In my opinion. I still havent gotten the tune yet and if its of any consequence I have one bad Ignition wire.

Also Pacesetter used my car on there Facebook Page to get a sound clip of their Headers on our cars!!!!!

I uploaded a screen shot of my acceleration.

[alex553]

Re: 0-60 5.8 1/4 13.682 @ 86.68

Those numbers don't seem accurate

[ssms5411]

Re: 0-60 5.8 1/4 13.682 @ 86.68

GPS numbers are not really realistic, try a track for real numbers.

[nwilson44]

Re: 0-60 5.8 1/4 13.682 @ 86.68

GPS numbers are not really realistic, try a track for real numbers.

I am trying lol, I want to go to the track but its a good 50+ miles away. I mean magazines test cars with GPS?!?! I got a perfect launch too with warm tires. It is running its best, but I will verify with a trip to the track asap.

[ssms5411]

Re: 0-60 5.8 1/4 13.682 @ 86.68

I am trying lol, I want to go to the track but its a good 50+ miles away. I mean magazines test cars with GPS?!?! I got a perfect launch too with warm tires. It is running its best, but I will verify with a trip to the track asap.

I don't know any magazine that uses a GPS for their times. I watch Motor week and they use a track to post any of their numbers on the cars they review. Your car is a 15 second to maybe high 14 sec. car with your mods depending on the DA.

[LETZRIDE]

Re: 0-60 5.8 1/4 13.682 @ 86.68

Those numbers aren't even close to accurate...13.6 @86mph? If you are truly trapping 86mph in the 1/4 you're a mid to high 15 second car.

The only way those numbers are even remotely possible is if you had a 10 second car that was on the brakes slowing down after the 1/8th, and if that were so, your 1/8th mile would not have such a low trap either.

None of those numbers correlate to the respective speeds or are even remotely close to correlating.

To run a 13.6 you are trapping very high 90's like 98-99mph at a minimum and that's in an A4, if you are manual you are trapping even higher, probably about 5mph higher.

[nwilson44]

Re: 0-60 5.8 1/4 13.682 @ 86.68

Those numbers aren't even close to accurate...13.6 @86mph? If you are truly trapping 86mph in the 1/4 you're a mid to high 15 second car.

The only way those numbers are even remotely possible is if you had a 10 second car that was on the brakes slowing down after the 1/8th, and if that were so, your 1/8th mile would not have such a low trap either.

None of those numbers correlate to the respective speeds or are even remotely close to correlating.

To run a 13.6 you are trapping very high 90's like 98-99mph at a minimum and that's in an A4, if you are manual you are trapping even higher, probably about 5mph higher.

Yeah I am starting to question this application now. It had full GPS signal so IDK why it didnt get accurate results. That trap speed is low

[nwilson44]

Re: 0-60 5.8 1/4 13.682 @ 86.68

Those numbers aren't even close to accurate...13.6 @86mph? If you are truly trapping 86mph in the 1/4 you're a mid to high 15 second car.

The only way those numbers are even remotely possible is if you had a 10 second car that was on the brakes slowing down after the 1/8th, and if that were so, your 1/8th mile would not have such a low trap either.

None of those numbers correlate to the respective speeds or are even remotely close to correlating.

To run a 13.6 you are trapping very high 90's like 98-99mph at a minimum and that's in an A4, if you are manual you are trapping even higher, probably about 5mph higher.

What do you think about the 0-60?

[LETZRIDE]

Re: 0-60 5.8 1/4 13.682 @ 86.68

it matches likely what a 13.6 car would do, not yours lol. You're likely high high 6's, low 7's.

Depends on a lot of things though to. You could be a slow car, but do 0-60 stupid fast with a big stall with a large STR and really numerically high gearing.

[bigbrian442]

Re: 0-60 5.8 1/4 13.682 @ 86.68

60' 2.793@ 55.38 MPH

0-60 5.864 seconds

IT takes more than 3 seconds to get that last 4 1/2 MPH?

That 60' puts you close to 16.0 ET.

And your GPS APP should go to the recycle bin.

[nwilson44]

Re: 0-60 5.8 1/4 13.682 @ 86.68

60' 2.793@ 55.38 MPH

0-60 5.864 seconds

IT takes more than 3 seconds to get that last 4 1/2 MPH?

That 60' puts you close to 16.0 ET.

And your GPS APP should go to the recycle bin.

lol yeah I think thats where its going lol I want to get to the track so bad lol but work is killing me! I am going to post a review on my car on my channel in a bit, along with the other reviews I have collected. I am going to go to the track as soon as I can, but yeah 200+ HP + 3400IBS is deff in the high14 low 15.

[transamtom1]

Re: 0-60 5.8 1/4 13.682 @ 86.68

50 miles isn't that far to drive to get to the track.

I drive that everytime I go to TMSP.

Mike has to drive further than me.

If I go to St. Thomas its 210 miles round trip.

[nwilson44]

Re: 0-60 5.8 1/4 13.682 @ 86.68

50 miles isn't that far to drive to get to the track.

I drive that everytime I go to TMSP.

Mike has to drive further than me.

If I go to St. Thomas its 210 miles round trip.

No its not so much the distance as it is the time. I only have certain friday's off a month so its difficult. Royal Purple raceway is pretty close compared to how far some people drive.

[insidethreat07]

Re: 0-60 5.8 1/4 13.682 @ 86.68

Those number are not right. I run 15.5s at 88mph in the 1/4 mile

[insidethreat07]

Re: 0-60 5.8 1/4 13.682 @ 86.68

I am trying lol, I want to go to the track but its a good 50+ miles away. I mean magazines test cars with GPS?!?! I got a perfect launch too with warm tires. It is running its best, but I will verify with a trip to the track asap.

No excuses lol. I drove 110 miles one way to the track many times this summer for points.