Ok that's it!!!

[96_V6_Fbody]

Ok guys, I've gotten blown away by enough rice!!! I have a Stang back home that I could spend $3,000 on and put on the Paxton. This will put the car over 350HP at least. Or I can always put that in to the Camaro. What I'm saying is, which is the better choice. And not just cause it's A Camaro!! I mean as far as bang for the buck goes.

[Tyler]

i definately do not think the paxton will get your mustang to 350 hp. unless its a v8?

why not get the vortec supercharger with aftercooler for the stang instead?

[AllTheGoodNamesAreGone]

is the stang a v8? what year??

if the stang is an 8.. do the stang.. i would do something insane..

keep the camaro for you daily driver..

good luck,
~billy

[viper98885]

In my opinion, it all depends on if the stang is a V8. As the old statement goes, there's no replacement for displacement. As much as I like my 3.4L V6 now, if I had spent the same amount of money on my LS1, it would be MUCH MORE powerful than the V6.

[96_V6_Fbody]

Ok, well the Stang is a 1965 Coupe with a 289 and 4 barrel. With Headers and twin 40 Series Flows. Also K&N Filter and Moroso Wires. C4 auto tranny. No posi though.

[camaro_speedemon]

Dude, do you have to ask? Work the stang, restored older cars turn lots of heads, Not that the camaro doesn't, but nothing matches the sound of a worked classic muscle car, even if it's a Mustang. [img]tongue.gif[/img] That's what I would do.