1. Octane DOES NOT create Horsepower all by itself.
2. If higher octane proved to provide more power, then the computer was responding to the fact that it could advance the timing further and still experience no ping, thus giving you more power.
3. A computer controlled fuel/ignition system CAN NOT show the true dynamic of octane, only a basic, fully mechanical controlled fuel & ignition system would show you that.
...Lower octane fuel burns faster, hotter and more violently than higher octane gas, and, timing and KR being equal, will ALWAYS make more power.
I run 93 in my LS1 because it's a high compression engine with a sensive computer and overactive Knock Sensors.. (Plus I'm milled from 10.1:1 compression to 11.1:1 compression), but I NEVER ran anything but 87 in my V6 Camaro... Compression didn't warrant it.
BTW, someone asked... 93 octane limits are around 11.5:1 compression, depending on other factors (temp, humidity, etc...) 11.1:1 is as high as I'd go on any street car, maybe even stay around 11:1.
2. If higher octane proved to provide more power, then the computer was responding to the fact that it could advance the timing further and still experience no ping, thus giving you more power.
3. A computer controlled fuel/ignition system CAN NOT show the true dynamic of octane, only a basic, fully mechanical controlled fuel & ignition system would show you that.
...Lower octane fuel burns faster, hotter and more violently than higher octane gas, and, timing and KR being equal, will ALWAYS make more power.
I run 93 in my LS1 because it's a high compression engine with a sensive computer and overactive Knock Sensors.. (Plus I'm milled from 10.1:1 compression to 11.1:1 compression), but I NEVER ran anything but 87 in my V6 Camaro... Compression didn't warrant it.
BTW, someone asked... 93 octane limits are around 11.5:1 compression, depending on other factors (temp, humidity, etc...) 11.1:1 is as high as I'd go on any street car, maybe even stay around 11:1.
Comment