Tweet
Originally posted by skorpion317:
2.73s are lower-performance than the 3.42s...torque has nothing to do with it.
2.73s are lower-performance than the 3.42s...torque has nothing to do with it.
-
Actually torque has a lot to do with it. More torque at the motor...more torque at the wheels. The V8s put out more torque so if you are less interested in performance and more in gas mileage then the 2.73s would be perfect. If you put 2.73s in a 6 it would probably take you about 15 seconds to get to 60.<a href=\"http://www.onid.orst.edu/~waltejam/\" target=\"_blank\">98 Bright Red Camaro</a><br />Too many mods to list....check my website -
You mean our cars get to 60 in less than 15 seconds? :looks down at 3.4: Oh, there's the problem... :DOriginally posted by skorpion317:
If you put 2.73s in a 6 it would probably take you about 15 seconds to get to 60.Check out my stable of supercharged W-Bodies <a href=\"http://www.fullthrottlev6.com/forums/vbgarage.php?do=view&id=136\" target=\"_blank\">HERE</a><br /><b>\'97 Pontiac GP GTP Coupe</b><br /><b>\'98 Regal GS | L67 3800 Series II</b>Comment
-
I would take the 3.42+lsd over muffler and pipes.Comment
-
I’m new. I actually don’t own a Camaro or firebird. I do have a 2000 Camaro 3.8 fly by throttle and 4l60e. This is installed in a 1980 Triumph TR7...1 week ago -
Not much going on, replaced my Kenwood double din stereo with a Pioneer double din, the Kenwood had problems. Then replaced my power inverter for my reverse...1 week ago -
Hi all new to the community here. I have a 2014 RS 6 speed manual... and so about a year ago my tail lights got cracked and eventually the plastic housing...3 weeks ago
Comment