i read in an earlier post that there was a problem with the autotap in windows mode but it never said what? so what is everybody using dos or windows? whichis better obdII or autotap? is anyone here running obdII?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
autotap- dos or windows?
Collapse
X
-
autotap- dos or windows?
98 camaro 3.8 (THE PUNISHER)<p>JET STAGE II/B&M SHIFT PLUS/TAYLOR WIRES/SLP LOUDMOUTH w-3\" s- pipe/SLP CAI/SS MESH GRILLE/160 STAT/DERALE OIL COOLER<br />FLEXALITE TRANS COOLER/ 3.42-ZEXEL-TORSEN/KONIG MONSOON & KUHMO TIRES/MANUAL FAN SWITCH/1le sway bars & poly/KYB AGX SHOCKS/H&R SPRINGS/LS1 ALUMINUM DRIVE SHAFT/rk sport headers<p>WAITING FOR INSTALL:ssm heads,cam,3 angle valves/trans go shift kitTags: None
-
IN GENERAL: DOS can accept and respond to serial and parallel data much faster than most of the windows environments. (Win2K built on NT is pretty fast)
I've never used the software of which you speak, but if there is any kind of back/forth communication (or even one-way) I would suggest using whatever DOS option there might be.
P.S. don't run DOS on windows! That kinda defeats the whole purpose... reboot in DOS mode (if it's an option) otherwise, you'll have to install it.
-BrianMaroon 1995 Camaro<br />No mods yet...<br />Lucky to have found this site!
-
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by seal:
DOS runs windows [img]smile.gif[/img]
every comp comes with dos, but they are setup to work with windows [img]smile.gif[/img] you can run DOS while running windows by doing this: (ok, what OS you have now? 98? ME? XP?)<hr></blockquote>
win2k has no dos and you can't run dos on it.
Comment
-
Win NT, Win 2k, and Win XP are all NT based and have no dos whatsoever.
I would not trust windows 95/98/ME in anything "mission critical", and I would consider autotap just that. Last thing I need is to have it crash going down the track on a busy night an me lose an opportunity to get some nfo.
So, I would use a WinNT based as my first choice (more flexible if I want to do other things w/ the computer in my car), DOS as my second, and I wouldn't even consider Win 9x.2001 75th Anniversary V6 Pewter Firebird w/ Chrome Wheels, T-Tops, & Y87<br />Mods: Free Ram Air, !Silencer, Holley Filter, Full 3\" Hooker Catback, 3\" Cat<br />Best time: 15.095 at 90.00 MPH with a 2.127 60\'
Comment
-
THis is not DOS vs WINDOWS.. this is ADVANCED TECH.
I use both. I use windows autotap to check DTC's so I can get the full description. I use DOS autotap to log.
www.autotap.com for updates.
I'm also moving this to general tech as its a pretty basic question.Keith - Chicago<br /><a href=\"http://www.hptuners.com\" target=\"_blank\">HP Tuners - PCM Reprogramming</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.dxsoftware.com/magnus/\" target=\"_blank\">97 Firebird V6 to LS1 swap</a><br /><b>V8 9.967@132.78</b> 1.322 60\' NA Heads/Cam<br /><b>V8 10.295@128.48</b> 1.363 60\' NA Cam Only<br /><b>V8 10.987@119.31</b> 1.422 60\' NA Stock Internals<br /><b>V6 13.674@98.22</b> NA<br /><b>V6 12.394@104.91</b> N20 100HP
Comment
-
ok now that the great debate on windows is over can anyone answer my original questions?
what is wrong with running autotap on windows?
which is better obdII or autotap?
is anyone running obdII?98 camaro 3.8 (THE PUNISHER)<p>JET STAGE II/B&M SHIFT PLUS/TAYLOR WIRES/SLP LOUDMOUTH w-3\" s- pipe/SLP CAI/SS MESH GRILLE/160 STAT/DERALE OIL COOLER<br />FLEXALITE TRANS COOLER/ 3.42-ZEXEL-TORSEN/KONIG MONSOON & KUHMO TIRES/MANUAL FAN SWITCH/1le sway bars & poly/KYB AGX SHOCKS/H&R SPRINGS/LS1 ALUMINUM DRIVE SHAFT/rk sport headers<p>WAITING FOR INSTALL:ssm heads,cam,3 angle valves/trans go shift kit
Comment
Latest Topics
Collapse
-
by Andy HHey everyone! I've been trying to remove my transmission for two days now! I need to replace the clutch. Only thing I've got left holding the transmission...2 weeks ago
-
by fishinI usually have to double, triple my headlight switch for them to come up on my 97 Firebird. I cleaned all connections. Could it be the headlight switch...3 weeks ago
Comment