haha ran g-tech tonight

[98Camaro3.8]

Originally posted by bret_xi:
what is g tech?

Originally posted by bret_xi:
wow that helped...lol

Ever used a search engine? Just go to google and type in g-tech. Takes 10 seconds to find the answer.

http://www.gtechpro.com/

[bret_xi]

that was harsh... but i hardly ever use search engines.. most of the tiem i just type in whatever site i want...and its usually just here and my email...or ebay

[Turbo V6 Camaro]

Originally posted by bret_xi:
that was harsh... but i hardly ever use search engines.. most of the tiem i just type in whatever site i want...and its usually just here and my email...or ebay

don't sweet it man he and i just found our $5000+ we put into our motor might all go up in smoke cause of one stupid company

[RancidCamaro]

Originally posted by viper04af:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by bret_xi:
that was harsh... but i hardly ever use search engines.. most of the tiem i just type in whatever site i want...and its usually just here and my email...or ebay

don't sweet it man he and i just found our $5000+ we put into our motor might all go up in smoke cause of one stupid company </font>[/QUOTE]Intense?

[black96V6]

well i ran g-tech again sat night and ran a 15.74 at 87mph : ) what what lol

[KenDawg]

http://www.angelfire.com/tn3/kaitlyn/HondaSong2.html
'nouh said.

[Dizturbed One]

^hahahahaha

that was great

I like asking my buddy how much horsepower his little wing on the back added to his Civic.

"no seriously... I've been wondering whether I should install a wing or some exhuast on my Camaro... I just can't decide man, help me out."

[mjparme]

Originally posted by 98Camaro3.8:
g-tech = g-crap.

Don't believe what it tells you.

A properly calibrated g-tech used on a flat surface is pretty accurate.

The problem is no one really takes the time to calibrate them, or they don't run on a flat surface.

[black98V6]

car and driver just did a comparison of several of these onboard timing devices and put em against timing lights at a strip also put em up against their own $11k GPS based test equipment. The results were quite interesting. Head over to www.caranddriver.com and they have breakdowns of the results in a spreadsheet. Auctually the G-tech was one of the most accurate right out of the box with calibration it was even more correct, though if I remember right it DID show trap speeds to be like a half mile or so higher than auctual speed.

[stktrtlewthbenie]

anyone know what a 95 firebird 3.4 auto. should run? its basically stock,but the guy or whoever befor me put exhaust on it,and i put an intake on it.and runs good.

[Dan Oyer]

Originally posted by stktrtlewthbenie:
anyone know what a 95 firebird 3.4 auto. should run? its basically stock,but the guy or whoever befor me put exhaust on it,and i put an intake on it.and runs good.

Mine runs about 15.8, but I also have an AIT chip, adds 15-20 whp, with a cold air intake and a Dyno Max muffler.

[stktrtlewthbenie]

kinda funny how your friend talks **** about your car and how he can beat you. i got a 3.4 firebird auto....and hes got a nissan 200sx with a 5spd. and an sr-20....and i kept up with him and out ran him...beat him from 0-45 and 0-..90? not to mention i had a FULL tank of gas,and about an extra 80lbs in my trunk...when he had less than a 1/4 and..nothing in his car. but yet..he still thinks he can beat me.

[stktrtlewthbenie]

where did you get your AIT chip? and how much? and where did you notice the most increase?

[White97RS]

MJ is right nobody takes time to read the directions, so they think its crap. It definitely is as accurate as advertised. People are just know-it alls.