160 Vs. 180 thermostat

white96six

Lookin' for 13's

Project F-body

Join Date: Aug 2003

Posts: 194
- Share
- Tweet
#1

160 Vs. 180 thermostat

08-15-2003, 01:25 PM

i have a 1996 m5 and am ordering the first mods for the car [img]graemlins/burnout.gif[/img] i am going with the flowmaster cat back and I want to get a thermostat, what is better 160 or 180? can I go with either? [img]graemlins/burnout.gif[/img]

white 1996 camaro 3800: flowmaster American thunder cat back. hypertech 160* stat, and manual fan switch
Tags: None
98Camaro3.8

Advanced Tech *********

F-body Forever

Join Date: Sep 2001

Posts: 5855
- Share
- Tweet
#2

08-15-2003, 01:28 PM

There's been many discussions about this. Kind of like 3" or 2.75" exhaust. Some say one is better, others think different. Do a search and you'll find a bunch of info.

Matt
1998 Mystic Teal Camaro M5
Whisper Lid, Pacesetter Headers, Catco Cat, Dynomax Super Turbo, B&M Shifter, BMR STB, LSD, P&P Intakes, GT2 Cam, Comp OE Lifters, 1.7 Roller Rockers, Pushrods, SSM Heads, DHP PowrTuner.
Comment
Red94Camaro

Lookin' for 13's

Still Plays With Cars

Join Date: Dec 2001

Posts: 477
- Share
- Tweet
#3

08-15-2003, 01:38 PM

go with a 180, will be good enough.

2003 Nissan 350Z Touring Coupe, Daytona Blue, Frost leather interior, navigation, 18 inch wheels, M6, fully loaded, intake, crank pulley. Previous cars: 1991 Mustang (347) 2002 RS Camaro 1985 IROC-Z (305) 1994 Camaro convertible V6
Comment

Announcement