omg pipes, pipes, pipes, im so confussed...

[shortdog273]

<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by 99Camaro99:
For NA applications, 3" is too much for the 3.8[/QB]<hr></blockquote>
I probably would've agreed with until today. With the 3" I pipe and flowmaster and ran a new best of 14.89 @ 90.38 Mph. [img]graemlins/thumbsup.gif[/img] on the 3" pipe.

[99Camaro99]

<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by shortdog273:

I probably would've agreed with until today. With the 3" I pipe and flowmaster and ran a new best of 14.89 @ 90.38 Mph. [img]graemlins/thumbsup.gif[/img] on the 3" pipe.<hr></blockquote>

14.89 - 14.31...I don't think I could even ponder a thought in two one-hundreth's of a second. That is NOT a significant difference to determine that 3" is better. Now if you did 14.75 or 14.80 and could consistently back it up than yes, it helped. When I went from stock to 2.75" I went from 15.45 @ 86 to 15.31 @ 87.5MPH over an average of four runs on each trial. Now that's consistency...not .02sec. Do ya have any idea how short of time that is?

[shortdog273]

The point is, the 3" pipe didn't hurt MY times. I can't speak for everybody else though. Only my experience with it. :cool:

[toast]

I know that the Catco cat and 3inch pipes helped me. My 0 to 60 droped from 7.0 down to 6.6. I cant wait to get it out on the track.