Stock Vs. Pacesetter... pacesetter wins (pics)

[Oi Bird V8]

just thought id make a post with pics of how amazingly restrictive the stock manifolds are compared to the pacesetter's wow...





big differance huh ? :naughty:

[SilverRS96]

Re: Stock Vs. Pacesetter... pacesetter wins (pics)

id like to c then next to the tubular manifolds...those on a 3.4 or 3.8?

[Oi Bird V8]

Re: Stock Vs. Pacesetter... pacesetter wins (pics)

id like to c then next to the tubular manifolds...those on a 3.4 or 3.8?

from my 3.4

[VendettaV6]

Re: Stock Vs. Pacesetter... pacesetter wins (pics)

sweet... those stock ones look funny....

[auto666]

Re: Stock Vs. Pacesetter... pacesetter wins (pics)

whats the seat of the pants difference ive got a 95 3.4 and i've been looking at getting them

[black95maro]

Re: Stock Vs. Pacesetter... pacesetter wins (pics)

Did you notice a very decent gain in performance, was it worth the money?

[loser]

Re: Stock Vs. Pacesetter... pacesetter wins (pics)

he doesnt have them on yet, and half his motor is ripped apart for his cam swap.

[Vanquish]

Re: Stock Vs. Pacesetter... pacesetter wins (pics)

Did you notice a very decent gain in performance, was it worth the money?

It is worth every single penny. Even if they cost $400 I would still buy them. They are a great addition to have, and sound great on our cars. I promise you won't regret it, unless you don't also pickup Abbott Racing's headers gasket $35 shipped.

[Smoke Panther]

Re: Stock Vs. Pacesetter... pacesetter wins (pics)

Did you notice a very decent gain in performance, was it worth the money?

the gains are substantial over log-style manifolds

[kala]

Re: Stock Vs. Pacesetter... pacesetter wins (pics)

I like the stock better ............. :p



:)

[black95maro]

Re: Stock Vs. Pacesetter... pacesetter wins (pics)

he doesnt have them on yet, and half his motor is ripped apart for his cam swap.

oooohhhh

[wolf]

Re: Stock Vs. Pacesetter... pacesetter wins (pics)

ummm thats a 3.8 header in the pic

[FireBird_Fr3ak]

Re: Stock Vs. Pacesetter... pacesetter wins (pics)

^^^^:poke:

from my 3.4

[FireBird_Fr3ak]

Re: Stock Vs. Pacesetter... pacesetter wins (pics)

http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l3...t=CIMG1167.jpg Heres a pic of the 3.8 comparison if anyone wants it.

[JohnnyC]

Re: Stock Vs. Pacesetter... pacesetter wins (pics)

Wow, what I don't understand is how the 97 F-bodies are rated the same as the 98 F-bodies when there is that much of a massive difference between the stock manifolds... It makes me wonder to myself if there is a difference in the tuning, like if the 98 does not make more power than the 97 even given the added flow, is it tuned down to make less power to match the previous year? Also the one-piece driveshafts they added later to the V6 F-bodies, is there a substantial difference, from say, a 96 Camaro, hardtop, 5speed to its 2002 counterpart in terms of acceleration, despite the same horsepower rating?