Welcome to the FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I have a 95 3.4 with like 110,000 miles or so, all of which are highway miles and the engine is in great running order(so far). I just wanted to know if my engine and auto transmission would have a good chance of taking a 50-75 shot of nitrous??? If it can, and I hope it will, I will be using the NOS #5175 kit. I do have a gutted CAT, 3" catback with flowmaster and a CAI if this helps.
Well yes a full exhaust and intake do improve the nitrous system.
As for 110,000 miles......., if it runs perfect and is well maintained then you could but just remember it could go boom, or just break.
High mileage engines may not like the added stress of nitrous.
Even a 50 shot can grenade a brand new engine
Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet
12second is right, anything can happen. I'm spraying with an engine that has 185,000 miles on it and she's still doing fine, not even the slightest signs of real wear but I have a complete engine kit standing by.
got 105K on my 3.8. Spraying 75 shot regularly. She still is doing just fine. Keep and eye on fuel pressure, air/fuel ratio, and nitrous pressure. Dont try and push it to hard.
Andy Adamez<br />--------------------<br />3.8L 97 V6<br />Hurst Shifter w/ Home Made Handle, Hypertech 160 Thermo, Ported MAF, 5 Point Harness for Pass & Driver, Painted Valve Covers, Nitrous Express Wet EFI Kit
I have 157,750 on mine, and I know someone with a NOS kit on his 93 LT1 and he had no probs, 100 shot got him to 11.8 from 12.95. Here is the thing with NOS, as long as there is enough fuel to go with the juice you will be fine. This means better fuel injectors, a secondary fuel pump. Also, make sure you are not running too rich/lean if you are at an optimium level, again you will be fine. The last concern is you main caps they get a little stressed out, but I think they should hold. Just get an air/fuel ratio guage and monitor it. Also get a window swtich and have it kick on at like 3000 and turn off at close to your rev limit(On mine it WAS like 5700) but I have a V8. You won't have engine damage and DRY is safer than WET. There is a science to it, it is not push the button and cross your fingers, just do not exceed a 100 shot and you will be fine. Good luck!!!
Better injectors? Well, clean ones performing to their fullest.
Not bigger though cause we know what happened to mine
Secondary pump as in piggie back pump is a good idea.
So far magnus just went with a drop in walbro in tank 255 lph pump and maf translator and I went with custom computer programming, afpr, and kenne bell boost a pump.
Our blower people have the piggie back system, it is nice
Rich is fine, lean is bad
Dry vs wet, which is safer??? That will be the old debate here.
All I can say is our intake manifolds are not designed for fuel, that is why most of the kits are dry.
But, wet is better for high hp applications and more torque
Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet
Not much going on, replaced my Kenwood double din stereo with a Pioneer double din, the Kenwood had problems. Then replaced my power inverter for my reverse...
3 weeks ago
FORUM SPONSORS
Collapse
Working...
X
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment