Just curious to see what it would take to convert to a wet kit. I was thinking of maybe trying to buy the pieces seperate. Just an idea
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Wet kit conversion
Collapse
X
-
Wet kit conversion
1998 Red RS 3.8l A4<br /> Whisper - K&N - N20 - 1LE Panhard - Ghetto STB - 255/50ZR16 Ecsta<br /> Removed grille - Limo tint - blackouts - A-pillar cf a/f ratio<br /> Panasonic DF88 - 1 12\" Eclipse 88120.4 - Eclipse 3322 amp<p><a href=\"http://members.cardomain.com/raven_rs\" target=\"_blank\">http://members.cardomain.com/raven_rs</a>Tags: None
-
What kit do you have?
NOS?
If yes I bought a conversion kit from tnt for $399.
It came with a nitrous and a fuel solenoid.
4 braided lines
2 y fittings
JetsRace car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet
-
Yeah, I've got a NOS kit. Why did it come with an extra nitrous solenoid? I just looked at the pics of your setup closer and answered some questions I had. Is two nozzles the standard in wet kits? Could you get away with just 1? If I can piece it together for somewhat cheap I just might go for wet. I would rather deal with nitrous backfires than relying on the car to deliver the fuel it's self. Also I'm assuming the wet kit gets rid of all need for a nitrous regulator and all vacuume lines.1998 Red RS 3.8l A4<br /> Whisper - K&N - N20 - 1LE Panhard - Ghetto STB - 255/50ZR16 Ecsta<br /> Removed grille - Limo tint - blackouts - A-pillar cf a/f ratio<br /> Panasonic DF88 - 1 12\" Eclipse 88120.4 - Eclipse 3322 amp<p><a href=\"http://members.cardomain.com/raven_rs\" target=\"_blank\">http://members.cardomain.com/raven_rs</a>
Comment
-
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by RaVeN1469:
Why did it come with an extra nitrous solenoid? <hr></blockquote>
I would say it is because all solenoids are NOT created equal. TNT is known for making bigger numbers than other brands. So if you had a TNT solenoid for the nitrous, and a NOS for fuel, it may not be as efficient, and could make for a lean or very rich condition.<a href=\"http://www.fullthrottlev6.com\" target=\"_blank\">www.fullthrottlev6.com</a> THE SOURCE!
Comment
-
You can use one or two nozzles.
TNT seems to like the twin nozzle set up.
You obviously need to have 2 solenoids, 1 fuel and one nitrous.
You would rather deal with nitrous backfires?
Backfires can blow out your stock maf, stock intake, any kind of cold air you have, damage any of the other sensors, start a fire.
Dry kits aren't that bad.
The car must supply its fuel if it is dry or wet, dry requires injectors to do it, wet is done through the fuel rail.
Wet kit eliminates the vaccum set up and regulatorRace car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet
Comment
Latest Topics
Collapse
-
Hey guys. For starters I’ve always been a big car guy, I love all types of cars and can appreciate all types of engineering. I’ve always been a Chevy...2 days ago
-
by ssms5411Getting a massage saying invalid interface, haven’t used it since last year probably November. First time in 23 years I had a problem. Going to get...4 days ago
-
need help finding a balancer and a replacement balancer bolt. im at a lost after confusing myself researching.1 week ago
-
Hello every one, ozzy here ive been looking at this page for weeks now finally joined. So my question is why is it that every turbo build forum just ends...1 week ago
Comment