Nitrous + 3.4 - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nitrous + 3.4

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nitrous + 3.4

    Hey guys, and before you reply to this: yes I did a search. I have a 94 A4 3.4 camaro w/ a K&N FIPK, 2.5 inch flowmaster catback (http://www.splmeter.com/94camaro.html), and a B&M shift plus. I was wondering what is the best nitrous kit for the money, and what is safest. Wet or dry? Tnt? NOS? NX? Help me out here, and also what kind of gains should I expect using a 75- 85 shot? Now i run a 10.6 in the 1/8.
    Thanks
    White 94 3.4 A4 Camaro<br />Perf:<a href=\"http://www.splmeter.com/94camaro.html\" target=\"_blank\">2.5\" Flowmaster catback </a>, K&N FIPK, B&M ShiftPlus, Aluminum Driveshaft<br />App: 17\" Eagle 077 wheels, rk sport performance spoiler, clear corners<br />Audio: <a href=\"http://www.splmeter.com/box.html\" target=\"_blank\">Drivers side 12\" stealth box</a><br />Times: 10.602@64.2 w/ 2.25 60\' in the 1/8th

  • #2
    I would say go with a NX Wet kit. Or even TNT. But definitely go wet.

    Comment


    • #3
      What are the advantages of the wet kit over the dry kit? And I also thought that a wet kit would be too much power or something for my stock pistons.
      White 94 3.4 A4 Camaro<br />Perf:<a href=\"http://www.splmeter.com/94camaro.html\" target=\"_blank\">2.5\" Flowmaster catback </a>, K&N FIPK, B&M ShiftPlus, Aluminum Driveshaft<br />App: 17\" Eagle 077 wheels, rk sport performance spoiler, clear corners<br />Audio: <a href=\"http://www.splmeter.com/box.html\" target=\"_blank\">Drivers side 12\" stealth box</a><br />Times: 10.602@64.2 w/ 2.25 60\' in the 1/8th

      Comment


      • #4
        Your search sucked [img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img] j/k

        http://www.camarov6.com/cgi-bin/ulti...c&f=3&t=000624
        Wet vs dry discussed
        http://www.camarov6.com/cgi-bin/ulti...c&f=3&t=000855
        On a 3.4
        Safest nitrous kit is no nitrous kit
        Ditch the shift plus, it can ruin the internals of the tranny
        Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
        nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
        2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
        2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

        Comment


        • #5
          Thanks for the info 12sec, I guess my search was too specific and it left out a bunch of results. Also, Shift plus has been on the car for over a year, and it does the same thing that a real shift kit does which is raise internal pressure.
          White 94 3.4 A4 Camaro<br />Perf:<a href=\"http://www.splmeter.com/94camaro.html\" target=\"_blank\">2.5\" Flowmaster catback </a>, K&N FIPK, B&M ShiftPlus, Aluminum Driveshaft<br />App: 17\" Eagle 077 wheels, rk sport performance spoiler, clear corners<br />Audio: <a href=\"http://www.splmeter.com/box.html\" target=\"_blank\">Drivers side 12\" stealth box</a><br />Times: 10.602@64.2 w/ 2.25 60\' in the 1/8th

          Comment


          • #6
            Also, I read up about wet vs. dry, etc. Here is my dilemma. I would like a wet kit because of "safety" because of not running lean, but it has a possibility of backfires. I would like a dry kit because of install ease, but it has the possibility of running lean. Which is the safer method, assuming a perfect install?
            White 94 3.4 A4 Camaro<br />Perf:<a href=\"http://www.splmeter.com/94camaro.html\" target=\"_blank\">2.5\" Flowmaster catback </a>, K&N FIPK, B&M ShiftPlus, Aluminum Driveshaft<br />App: 17\" Eagle 077 wheels, rk sport performance spoiler, clear corners<br />Audio: <a href=\"http://www.splmeter.com/box.html\" target=\"_blank\">Drivers side 12\" stealth box</a><br />Times: 10.602@64.2 w/ 2.25 60\' in the 1/8th

            Comment


            • #7
              <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by spootydinkcamaro94:
              Thanks for the info 12sec, I guess my search was too specific and it left out a bunch of results. Also, Shift plus has been on the car for over a year, and it does the same thing that a real shift kit does which is raise internal pressure.<hr></blockquote>
              Trsut me man, I ran it also.
              It is completely different from a traditional shift kit.
              The shift plus just raises internal psi and over time can burst internal lines
              Shift kits have area's of the valve body drilled out for more fluid flow etc.
              I wouldn't lie to ya man, ditch it
              Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
              nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
              2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
              2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

              Comment


              • #8
                <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by spootydinkcamaro94:
                Also, I read up about wet vs. dry, etc. Here is my dilemma. I would like a wet kit because of "safety" because of not running lean, but it has a possibility of backfires. I would like a dry kit because of install ease, but it has the possibility of running lean. Which is the safer method, assuming a perfect install?<hr></blockquote>
                Well, assuming perfect install etc?
                You know that nitrous is not safe correct?
                I would suggest a dry kit for begginers
                It is much easier
                Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
                nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
                2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
                2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

                Comment

                Latest Topics

                Collapse

                FORUM SPONSORS

                Collapse
                Working...
                X