Check out these dyno numbers(graph posted)

[calvo]

I put down 251.62HP and 585.17ft/lbs with the bottle
and
180.32HP and 408.45Ft/lbs with out the bottle

I run a 75 wet shot and have a full intake and exhaust, shift kit, and 4.10 w/ LSd.
What do you all think? Do these numbers sound right?

[ June 06, 2004, 07:57 PM: Message edited by: calvo ]

[whiteshark]

um, did you use g-tech or something? Because you're torque seems a bit high.... like double.

[ReodDai]

yea no way your putting out that much torque bro not with those mods atleast. Horsepower looks about right I think I pushed around 185 or so with lid and muffler. I'd give u about 280-300 torque with juice.

[calvo]

No G-Tech these numbers came from a real dyno at a shop about an hour away from where I live.

[ReodDai]

then they never learned how to hook up the torque sensing part lol cuz your torque ain't right garunteed. Your mods (talking about the non juiced dyno) won't give you 180 rwtq over the stock crackshaft torque lol.

[OneQuickV6]

Let's see a graph. With the auto, my bet is that the peak number is on a spike, not a true representation of the torque your motor is actually making.

[Timbo1969]

Sounds like Converter spike to me..

[Turbo V6 Camaro]

what about the 4.10's what that have anything to do with it

[Tiago]

actually it probably is that they had the cyl firing frequency wrong.


they ALWAYS mess that up at dynos...and you get some outrageous tq number. I have to correct them every single time.

[Turbo V6 Camaro]

3.8 is like

165432 right?

[OneQuickV6]

Actually, on our dyno if we just hook the line to ANY plug wire, don't change ANYTHING in the PCM, and go WOT, it reads correctly. Same goes for any other dynojet. If they didn't correct anything in their computer, when the car goes WOT it'll still be ok.

Those numbers are a spike, I'd bet on it. Next time tell them to unlock the converter in the run by tapping the brake once just before going WOT. That'll do the trick.

[1998silverbird]

ITs probably a mustang dyno!! I put down with the 90 shot 260rwhp, and 823rwftlbs... On the dynojet I put down 292rwhp and 393rwtq on the same shot.. Mustang dynos read like 15 percent less hp but read inaccurate tq..

[Turbo V6 Camaro]

823 ft pounds on stock maro = bad lol

[ReodDai]

I wish I could pull 800 tq lol That would be a wild ride

[calvo]

I dont see any spike unless it did not regidter on the graph. Is tyhat likly?

How do I add images so i can post my graph?