Welcome to the FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Ive researched getting a cam and well, it cost too much. this will be on a dry shot of the giggle gas with some n/a kick also. so im going to get rocker arms so i want to know which are the best ratio 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9? also is there a major proformacnce difference between full roller rockers http://www.intense-racing.com/Mercha...egory_Code=HCV and the regular http://www.intense-racing.com/Mercha...ory_Code=HCV??
thanx
2005 Cavalier LS Sport M5<br /> <a href=\"http://members.cardomain.com/firefighter8615\" target=\"_blank\">http://members.cardomain.com/firefighter8615</a>
I don't know real proof on the 3.8, but going to a full roller rocker should net you more horsepower than a non. Be it 5-10 HP if the price is worth it to you. If all you are doing is rockers and not going internal engine I believe 1.9 full roller rocker would give you the best gains.
that would still keep you under .5 lift and open up the intake/exhaust a lot more than stock.
James, you should hear my car now, with the cutout.
2005 Cavalier LS Sport M5<br /> <a href=\"http://members.cardomain.com/firefighter8615\" target=\"_blank\">http://members.cardomain.com/firefighter8615</a>
People tell me I am VERY limited on choice of cams due to 1.8 roller rockers, sigh :(
Maybe advanced tech section?
if you were to have a cam ground for you they could take the 1.8 ratio into account and just give the cam less lift with the same ammount of duration as you would like for the bottle
Just put the stock rockers back on when you go to do a cam.
IMO - The rockers are way overpriced for the gains. Just save up more money and get a cam, it is WELL worth it. Rockers should only be changed out when a cam is NOT an option for some reason.
1997 Chevrolet Camaro v6 - 13.8@104MPH
1997 Dodge Viper GTS
2005 Cavalier LS Sport M5<br /> <a href=\"http://members.cardomain.com/firefighter8615\" target=\"_blank\">http://members.cardomain.com/firefighter8615</a>
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Comment