With N2O cylinders easily avail with pneumatic valves on them my question to the Nitrous masses is why would you go with a electromechanical method when, the other is way more reliable and a cheaper?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Question about auto bottle openers
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by 98DC:
With N2O cylinders easily avail with pneumatic valves on them my question to the Nitrous masses is why would you go with a electromechanical method when, the other is way more reliable and a cheaper?Red 1998 Camaro 3.8<br />K&N and Home Depot<br />2 12\" JL W3v2 Subwoofers<br />-more audio stuff to come-
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigredboy:
I've noticed that the remote bottle openers are ridiculously expensive. If you've got a cheaper way do tell, it will help with my future set up plans.2005 Cavalier LS Sport M5<br /> <a href=\"http://members.cardomain.com/firefighter8615\" target=\"_blank\">http://members.cardomain.com/firefighter8615</a>
Comment
-
Too many people I speak with complain about them.
Not opening fully
Not closing fully
Cost too much.
Just open it yourselfRace car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet
Comment
Latest Topics
Collapse
-
by DongrossmdI’m new. I actually don’t own a Camaro or firebird. I do have a 2000 Camaro 3.8 fly by throttle and 4l60e. This is installed in a 1980 Triumph TR7...2 weeks ago
-
by ssms5411Not much going on, replaced my Kenwood double din stereo with a Pioneer double din, the Kenwood had problems. Then replaced my power inverter for my reverse...3 weeks ago
Comment