96 3800 on a zex kit? - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

96 3800 on a zex kit?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 96 3800 on a zex kit?

    my friend bought a new zex kit for his altima he told me it was a dry kit and it works like a wet since the cpu adjust the fuel injectors to give mroe fuel hes sellign it to me for 300 with all the accessories im wondering how well will it work my firebird with only intake exhaust?


    any problems using a dry kit ive always used a wet kit in all of my cars
    96 Firebird 3.8L 5 spd Centerforce clutch MSD ignition dynomax dual exhaust SLP CAI

  • #2
    i heard dry kits are better than wet kits for our cars. But everyone has their opinions (i personally dont use nos, well not yet ;) ). Anyways it sounds like its a sweet deal for the kit!
    95 black 3.8 camaro, Intake, Pacesetters, Flowmaster 80 series, accel plugs and wires, B&M shift kit (eh could be better), hopefully a highflow cat soon. and a bunch of appearance mods.

    Comment


    • #3
      how long has he had the kit?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by DirtyDsm:
        my friend bought a new zex kit for his altima he told me it was a dry kit and it works like a wet since the cpu adjust the fuel injectors to give mroe fuel hes sellign it to me for 300 with all the accessories im wondering how well will it work my firebird with only intake exhaust?


        any problems using a dry kit ive always used a wet kit in all of my cars
        The NOS kits are the same way, while spraying they boost fuel pressure to compensate for the N20. Myself, and most people on this board using a dry kit, have had no problems with it. The key is if you want to spray a 100 shot or over, you need a better fuel pump or you will start to lean out. I use an 85 shot and it works perfectly. When you're spraying a dry kit, so long as the shot is reasonable, the setup is very simple. Not to mention you don't have to worry about fuel puddling in your intake and causing a backfire like you would with a wet kit.
        1997 Firebird, A4,WS6 Ram air hood, edelbrock catback, SLP CAI, 85 dry shot<br />1981 Firebird Trans Am<br /><br /> <a href=\"http://members.cardomain.com/dreaded_hope\" target=\"_blank\">http://members.cardomain.com/dreaded_hope</a>

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by that90spunk:
          i heard dry kits are better than wet kits for our cars. But everyone has their opinions (i personally dont use nos, well not yet ;) ). Anyways it sounds like its a sweet deal for the kit!
          Not true, wet is actually better for more power and torque for the shot. Only thing with wet is it isn't quite as safe usually as dry. Chances for puddling with wet where as dry you don't. Dry just depends on your computer adding the extra fuel which if it doesn't you can go lean.
          http://www.bowtiev6.com/

          Comment


          • #6
            oh i know that...I just meant that since the dry is safer to run most people would recommend it over wet.
            95 black 3.8 camaro, Intake, Pacesetters, Flowmaster 80 series, accel plugs and wires, B&M shift kit (eh could be better), hopefully a highflow cat soon. and a bunch of appearance mods.

            Comment


            • #7
              IMO A true dry kit is the best way to go, for safety and good power.

              A wet kit will puddle at a certain point.
              Direct port has similar risks, but not as bad, plus it costs a ton.

              A dry kit done truly right, would mean a computer tune so that when the nitrous is engaged, the cpu ups the fuel pressure and changes injector pulse widths to allow more fuel. With tuning, the sky is the limit on a dry kit for safety and affordability. Computers like AEM have this function built in. I would like to see someone use it.

              Sorry I went off topic, but dry kits are cool, I swear.
              1997 Chevrolet Camaro v6 - 13.8@104MPH
              1997 Dodge Viper GTS

              Comment


              • #8
                ^ i agree 100% [img]smile.gif[/img]
                <b>12 SECOND DUAL STAGE DRY NITROUS POWERED 98 A4 V6 CAMARO<br /><a href=\"http://www.mysickcamaro.50megs.com\" target=\"_blank\">www.MySickCamaro.50megs.com</a><br />Best ET: 12.82@103<br />Best MPH: 104.7<br />Best 60\': 1.75 - Stock TC</b><br /> </font><blockquote><font size=\"1\" face=\"Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif\">quote:</font><hr /><font size=\"2\" face=\"Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif\">Originally posted by Shodown:<br /><strong>1DV6 runs 12\'s...enough said. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size=\"2\" face=\"Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif\">

                Comment


                • #9
                  For me when i am going to invest in performance mods for my car. i prefer new its just me maybe a little crazy, but the fact is it hasn't been touched. if that makes any sense

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I am not a big fan of zex, I have put a zex kit on a honda, it was easy, but if something goes wrong, you have a bottle and a box.

                    You would have to take the box apart to get to anything, and god knows what is going on in there.

                    I am not even sure if you can use a window switch on it, or controller or anything else.
                    1997 Chevrolet Camaro v6 - 13.8@104MPH
                    1997 Dodge Viper GTS

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      x1

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        No to ZEX.

                        Direct port is the safest set up
                        Dry kit is runner up
                        Wet kit is last
                        Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
                        nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
                        2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
                        2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          this guy that has an import shop around here is tryin to sell me a zex kit are they no good?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I don't like ZEX.

                            I prefer NOS, NX and TNT
                            Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
                            nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
                            2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
                            2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              you guys who say you dont like zex, why not? i'm not advocating it, i'm just curious. do ya know how it really works or what is actually in that box? Nos and NX have some great kits, but to be honest, ive never heard of prople having problems with the ZEX kit, and i know quite a few people using them.

                              96 V6 A4 Camaro and 99 Z28 A4 Camaro
                              Visit My F-Body Page

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              FORUM SPONSORS

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X