Is it possible to tune our cars using a MAP rather then a MAF? The design I have in mind for the intake manifold at the moment, involves two throttle bodies and I am not sure how I will be able to tune using the Maf sensor...I think it would be easier to use a MAP...what would I need to set this up?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
MAP tuning
Collapse
X
-
MAP tuning
2002 SOM Z28 Camaro - 12.9 @ 104 mph
1996 3800 Camaro - 13.43 @ 100.77 mph
Project Cars | How To Guides | Scratch Repair | Synthetic OilTags: None
-
Re: MAP tuning
its using the lower holden manifold...not 100% sure how I will be orienting it yet...we're building the UIM from scratch...but I do know at the moment I would like to utilize twin throttle bodies...but tuning looks like it could be a PITA...I'm waiting on a bunch of parts to get here so I can begin taking measurements...and I am trying to think ahead to tuning, and possibly tuning it by MAP rather then MAF...
2002 SOM Z28 Camaro - 12.9 @ 104 mph
1996 3800 Camaro - 13.43 @ 100.77 mph
Project Cars | How To Guides | Scratch Repair | Synthetic Oil
Comment
-
Re: MAP tuning
I wouldn't use 2 just maybe a 75mm, I think ZZP has northstar TB's if it will fit and just maf tune it, 97's I don't think respond well to not using the maf to tune.08' L76 6.0L 4X4 Chevy EXT.Cab LTZ Vortec MAX with Snug top cover, Dynomax exhaust,Hptuners& K&N intake
96' Camaro M5 to A4 conversion, alot of mods . GT35R Turbo full suspension. Built engine
Comment
-
Re: MAP tuning
Originally posted by ssms5411 View PostI wouldn't use 2 just maybe a 75mm, I think ZZP has northstar TB's if it will fit and just maf tune it, 97's I don't think respond well to not using the maf to tune.
2002 SOM Z28 Camaro - 12.9 @ 104 mph
1996 3800 Camaro - 13.43 @ 100.77 mph
Project Cars | How To Guides | Scratch Repair | Synthetic Oil
Comment
-
Re: MAP tuning
Originally posted by Fondle View Postwhere would you fit two throttle bodys?
LETZRIDE:
Here is what you are after as far as design which is a dual tb holden intake.
Are you sticking to NA or are you gonna FI it? If NA you would need a big cam or something to have a need for dual tb's or it will be a waste.
I would run 1 tb off the front of the upper intake like our stockers if I were to make one. Or if you are set on the side tb, maybe look into a passenger side setup instead of a driver's side. Might be some more room there to route the intake instead of moving the power steering reservoir
Comment
-
Re: MAP tuning
Originally posted by 97rs4life View Poston his custom upper intake. ;)
I would run 1 tb off the front of the upper intake like our stockers if I were to make one. Or if you are set on the side tb, maybe look into a passenger side setup instead of a driver's side. Might be some more room there to route the intake instead of moving the power steering reservoir
I actually intend on trying to run the TB at the front...to be honest I am looking at more of a design similar to this (which is from FTV6) but not quite as big, and not as bulky...
or this
Of course we are also going to be looking into maybe going with a 1.7 roller rocker to increase the lift of the ARH cam...this is all just what I am visualizing right now...bottom line is it will come down to the measurements...I will be going about the intake and exhaust tuning using the helmholtz theory to do it (see my NA boost thread) ...until I get the heads and LIM at my door (they are on there way) I really can't do much...everything is going to boil down to the calculations and numbers...
One of the things I need to consider is MAP tuning and if it is possible or not...because especially if I go with something like the first pic, with two seperate manifolds, and Tbs...tuning with the MAF is going to be next to impossible as far as I can see...
I don't want to jump too far ahead of myself and wait until I begin building and have all the number finalized...only to find out I may be screwed tuning this thing...
I don't think that the double tb's will be a problem, if I keep the tb's small enough...remember, smaller tb's flow less air, but faster...If I do something like the first pic (only smaller) I could run 1 manifold per 3 cylinders...again, the mathematics will let me know if this will be overkill and will hurt performance. And yes, I know if I do something like the second pic, the alt will have to be moved...I have no A/c, so we can make a bracket and stick it there...
I am not ruling out just 1 TB yet...like I said, it is going to come down to the mathematical numbers and what will work best...not what will look coolest under the hood...but I would really love to have twins sitting under there :P
2002 SOM Z28 Camaro - 12.9 @ 104 mph
1996 3800 Camaro - 13.43 @ 100.77 mph
Project Cars | How To Guides | Scratch Repair | Synthetic Oil
Comment
-
Re: MAP tuning
maybe a standalone system is in store for you and your tuning needs then. Might open it up more for you than HPTuners as htpuners has a lot of the v6 tables locked yet and they are done updating our v6 programs. There is a hidden table that prevents me from running CL on my car, I have to run it OL at all times to perform correctly. No biggy as I have the MAF tuned perfectly
Comment
-
Re: MAP tuning
Originally posted by LETZRIDE View PostI actually intend on trying to run the TB at the front...to be honest I am looking at more of a design similar to this (which is from FTV6) but not quite as big, and not as bulky...
or this
Of course we are also going to be looking into maybe going with a 1.7 roller rocker to increase the lift of the ARH cam...this is all just what I am visualizing right now...bottom line is it will come down to the measurements...I will be going about the intake and exhaust tuning using the helmholtz theory to do it (see my NA boost thread) ...until I get the heads and LIM at my door (they are on there way) I really can't do much...everything is going to boil down to the calculations and numbers...
One of the things I need to consider is MAP tuning and if it is possible or not...because especially if I go with something like the first pic, with two seperate manifolds, and Tbs...tuning with the MAF is going to be next to impossible as far as I can see...
I don't want to jump too far ahead of myself and wait until I begin building and have all the number finalized...only to find out I may be screwed tuning this thing...
I don't think that the double tb's will be a problem, if I keep the tb's small enough...remember, smaller tb's flow less air, but faster...If I do something like the first pic (only smaller) I could run 1 manifold per 3 cylinders...again, the mathematics will let me know if this will be overkill and will hurt performance. And yes, I know if I do something like the second pic, the alt will have to be moved...I have no A/c, so we can make a bracket and stick it there...
I am not ruling out just 1 TB yet...like I said, it is going to come down to the mathematical numbers and what will work best...not what will look coolest under the hood...but I would really love to have twins sitting under there :P
Those look badd@ss , throw some turbos on them and your set.LOL08' L76 6.0L 4X4 Chevy EXT.Cab LTZ Vortec MAX with Snug top cover, Dynomax exhaust,Hptuners& K&N intake
96' Camaro M5 to A4 conversion, alot of mods . GT35R Turbo full suspension. Built engine
Comment
-
Re: MAP tuning
Originally posted by 97rs4life View Postmaybe a standalone system is in store for you and your tuning needs then. Might open it up more for you than HPTuners as htpuners has a lot of the v6 tables locked yet and they are done updating our v6 programs. There is a hidden table that prevents me from running CL on my car, I have to run it OL at all times to perform correctly. No biggy as I have the MAF tuned perfectly
This kind of sucks...so does this mean There is no way to tune via MAP or speed density? I'm stuck tuning only through VE tables and MAF tables? I thought there was speed density available through the VE table or something? (I don't really know how speed density works, I think it requires more credits, so I dont know if more stuff gets unlocked?)
otherwise if I run two tb's maybe I have to splice the maf sensors together...I can't see that working out very well though...
2002 SOM Z28 Camaro - 12.9 @ 104 mph
1996 3800 Camaro - 13.43 @ 100.77 mph
Project Cars | How To Guides | Scratch Repair | Synthetic Oil
Comment
-
Re: MAP tuning
I believe Lynxs got it to work with his turbo car, but it wasn't an easy task at all. Some of the holden cars are running off the MAP and eliminate the MAF but they use a different software than HPtuners down under and different stock computer to achieve their SD
Comment
-
Re: MAP tuning
I thought like the 99' and up pcm's can use SD but 97'-98' can't, because I think of the different maf in the TB's, the way it is setup. Thats what I think don't know for sure, but Hptuners doesn't have credits to buy for SD tunning on 3.8's. I like using the maf myself.08' L76 6.0L 4X4 Chevy EXT.Cab LTZ Vortec MAX with Snug top cover, Dynomax exhaust,Hptuners& K&N intake
96' Camaro M5 to A4 conversion, alot of mods . GT35R Turbo full suspension. Built engine
Comment
-
Re: MAP tuning
Originally posted by steddy View PostI'd almost say the pic on the bottom, the TBs are getting plumbed from dual turbos (1 each)08' L76 6.0L 4X4 Chevy EXT.Cab LTZ Vortec MAX with Snug top cover, Dynomax exhaust,Hptuners& K&N intake
96' Camaro M5 to A4 conversion, alot of mods . GT35R Turbo full suspension. Built engine
Comment
Latest Topics
Collapse
-
by ssms5411So my truck is finally getting some work done, after 17 years, Oil pressure sensor went out and it’s located under the lower intake manifold. Have to...1 week ago
-
Hey guys. For starters I’ve always been a big car guy, I love all types of cars and can appreciate all types of engineering. I’ve always been a Chevy...3 weeks ago
-
by ssms5411Getting a message saying invalid interface, haven’t used it since last year probably November. First time in 23 years I had a problem. Going to get...4 weeks ago
Comment