I Wanna Tune!! TUNE!

[Fondle]

Re: I Wanna Tune!! TUNE!

no these are not corrected, there was another v6 there with similar mods but different muffler and untuned and he dynod at 187/217 so im pretty sure mine are spot on, the second dyno i did the bottle wasnt even in the car, i posted the graphs before

[EarlR]

Re: I Wanna Tune!! TUNE!

Are those #'s at the wheels or with the 15% drivetrain loss added or SAE scaling added or changed, becuase people with cams and tuned don't even dyno that high. I think their is something wrong with those #'s probably the dyno or the dyno added in the 15% drivetrain loss. Becuase alot of people have dynoed before with bolt -ons and usally dyno 190's hp/ 200 Tq. Was your nitrous leaking into the intake when you dynoed?LOL It is hard to beleive those are at the wheel #'s without the graph or SAE #'s being modifed. This is just my opinion though seeing people dynoing stock and then with their bolt-on mods and then cams which I have seen alot of dyno #'s. I mean no offense to this, but it is hard to believe but to each to their own I guess.

It could be the dyno - I've heard many knowledgeable people talk about how much difference there can be going from a Dynojet to a Mustang to a Dynapack.

What I find more interesting is the relationship between HP and TQ on his chart. My car ('02, MT) made 165/193 bone stock (Dynojet), and when I added a K&N FIPK (same session) it bumped up to 169/197. HP is about 85%-86% of TQ in my case. The factory ratings (200/225) put the HP at about 89% of TQ. Fondle's figures put HP at 91% and 92% of TQ before/after the tune. Could that be the effect of the larger exhaust? If so I'm even more interested now to see what mine puts out with the big tubes.

Edit...didn't see Fondle's post before I started mine.

[ssms5411]

Re: I Wanna Tune!! TUNE!

I read your problems on the dyno but you still can't just say it would of been becuase it could of topped out and failed off somewhere past 4500 RPMS on both dynos since you never got a good run in. Maybe it might run that high but until a graph shows it , I wouldn't guesstimate dyno #'s since your dynoing what people who have cams. The motor is going to peak then stay or fall off at one point it coul be at 4500 RPMS was peak and could of went down, I'm just sayig it could of. I will dyno mine this week with headeers,exhaust, intake and VS cam and see what it makes, N/A, most likely it won't be over what you posted even tuned, but well see. This is from what you wrote from FTV6.

edit: ughghg im so mad, i jsut found i had the fuel cut off set at 4500, as soon as i saw that i wanted to shoot my self, fu**, i just waisted money getting a dyno to only see half my results!
__________________
1999 Camaro 14.9@94-old time..
new numbers~215rwhp/234tq

Fondle

10-24-2009, 04:50 PM #2
Fondle

iTrader: (0) looking at my graph from my last dyno, i made 175hp at 4500 rpms, this time i made 196 at 4500, so thats 21hp gain, and the 20+hp gain is consistant at every rpm in the graph, so i think a decent estimate would be 215-220, since i dyno'd at 192 last time
__________________
1999 Camaro 14.9@94-old time..
new numbers~215rwhp/234tq

[Fondle]

Re: I Wanna Tune!! TUNE!

ya, i estimated the hp because it was a 20+ increase over the whole graph, i went and check and every rpm level between the first dyno and the second dyno was 20+ consistently , but the torque actually read 234 on the graph, i didnt estimate that,

but, just so i make this clear, i have spent hours and hours fine tuning my car at the track and on the road, these gains cannot be achieved through a simple mail order tune, yes you can get a good gain, but gains like these can only be had with fine tuning and one on one time with the car, not just a mail order style tuning