Tweet
what is the difference between the tubular and the 3 point subframe connectors? and what is usually better the bolt in or the weld on ones?
-
-
Re: subframe connectors
I don't see a significant difference between boxed and tubular sfc designs. Comparing 2 point versus 3 point designs; the 3 point should offer a bit more rigidity to the frame, but also more weight due to the extra material. The 2 point sfc are more than sufficient, but IMO the 3 point just look cooler. It also looks like the 3 point hang down a bit lower than the 2 point so you may lose a bit of ground clearance.Originally posted by Lilspleen View Post
I bought the bolt-in to make it easier to weld them on.
-
Re: subframe connectors
2 point will stiffen it up well enough.08' L76 6.0L 4X4 Chevy EXT.Cab LTZ Vortec MAX with Snug top cover, Dynomax exhaust,Hptuners& K&N intake
96' Camaro M5 to A4 conversion, alot of mods . GT35R Turbo full suspension. Built engineComment
-
Re: subframe connectors
i got the 3 point since im running alot of autocross action and i have t tops. if i had a hard top i would only run the 2 point connectors. weld in are stronger but bolt in are easier. mine are bolt in due to rules for stx class.Comment
-
I’m new. I actually don’t own a Camaro or firebird. I do have a 2000 Camaro 3.8 fly by throttle and 4l60e. This is installed in a 1980 Triumph TR7...1 week ago -
Not much going on, replaced my Kenwood double din stereo with a Pioneer double din, the Kenwood had problems. Then replaced my power inverter for my reverse...2 weeks ago -
Hi all new to the community here. I have a 2014 RS 6 speed manual... and so about a year ago my tail lights got cracked and eventually the plastic housing...4 weeks ago
Comment