SLP Bilsteins are softer then HD Bilsteins.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Spring Question
Collapse
X
-
If you don't have money to get the right shocks for the ProKit then don't get the Pro Kit. This is a quote from someone who had that combo.
-----------------------------------------------
"The ride with the ProKit is much stiffer, and with those stock, old decarbons, you've got a fairly bad setup. I'm using the Bilsteins that are recommended for the ProKit by shox.com (not the softer SLP setup) and while the ride isn't horrendous, the ride in my car is pretty rough.
For drag racing, the ProKit is pretty much the opposite of what you want, so I don't have much to help with there, unless you want to swap springs and shocks every time you race."
---------------------------------------------
Stiffer springs will shock the tires loose more easily due to not enough dampening. You can resolve some of that with shocks. SLP Bilsteins are very bad with Pro Kit. HD Bilsteins are better, but still will get worked heavily and not do their job. You can either get them revalved to handle the Pro Kit or don't get the Pro Kit. SLP Take-offs are worse then Bilsteins even.
Comment
-
So if I wanted to get a set of lowering springs. What should i get?Whisper Lid, SLP CAI, KN Filter, 3\" HiFlo Carsound Cat, full 3\" mandrel-bent piping, Flowmaster 80s, Casper O2 Sim, BM Tranny Cooler, Vigilante 3300 Torque Converter, Corvette Servo, 3.42 gears, SLP take-off LSD, Manual Fan Switch, & 160 Thermostat.
Comment
-
Just an FYI:
Bilstein has lowered their prices on the front 4th gen shocks, and they did so substantially.
The new price for the set of 4 HD's is $299.00 plus freight (old price was $400)
If you wish to have the fronts revalved for heavier and/or shorter springs, the price of 4 (front revalved, rear off the shelf) is now $450 (old price was $550).
__________________
Sam Strano
Strano Performance Parts
800-729-1831 ordering
814-849-3450 tech-line
www.stranoparts.com
Comment
-
Sam Strano actually recommended the Eibachs w/ the regular Bilstein HDs for a V6. Interesting. He claimed that one would not be happy on a V6 w/ revalved Bilsteins.2002 Camaro SS 6 Spd<br />Sebring Silver Metallic<br />Still breaking it in<p>Traded in - 2002 V6 5 Spd Camaro.<p>\"I\'ll never trust squirrels again.\"
Comment
-
This is exactly what Sam Strano said
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>
Lowering Camaro
Sam Strano 03/21/2002-02:07pm
Money,
First, for V-6 Camaro's I usually do not revalve the shocks. If I installed the revalving I do on a V-6 car with it's lighter front end, you wouldn't be happy. There is actually too much damping.
In your case, regular Bilstein HD's would be more than adequate (and less money). Eibach also makes a pro-kit specially for the lighter V-6 car. Those teamed up with the Bilstein HD's would be great.
As for LCA's, I don't use them. They are not legal for the classes I autocross in. But even without them, the cars seem to hook up really well (if given proper thought).
<hr></blockquote>
So what exactly does he mean about the LCA's? I don't need them?Whisper Lid, SLP CAI, KN Filter, 3\" HiFlo Carsound Cat, full 3\" mandrel-bent piping, Flowmaster 80s, Casper O2 Sim, BM Tranny Cooler, Vigilante 3300 Torque Converter, Corvette Servo, 3.42 gears, SLP take-off LSD, Manual Fan Switch, & 160 Thermostat.
Comment
-
Moneyshotz, with the LCA's, he's probably talking about reinforced ones. I also asked Sam about the SLP Bilsteins, he said that the rebound on them is too hard, so that they would start packing the front if you hit multiple bumps in quick succession. Basically, if you hit a bunch of bumps in a row, the SLP's wouldn't fully rebound before you hit the next bump, so each time, the shocks would get lower and lower. He recommended using the HDs, at least with the stock springs.
I'm going to try using stock V8 springs up front, and stock rears. One other guy on this board did that, his is a '94, but he said they actually lowered the front by like 3/4". I'll have to see with mine, since the 98-up cars use different springs. According to the technical database, the front V6 springs are 225lbs/in, and the front V8 springs are 292lb/in, so it's a pretty healthy increase. The rears are the same for V6s and V8s. The only concern I have with putting the V8s on the front is whether the V8 springs will ride higher with the lighter weight of my front end. I'll just have to see.
The only problem that I have with the 1LEs is that the fronts are linear rate, which means they're just plain stiff. If they were progessive rate, then I'd look into them. If my rear springs seem too soft, I may look at the rear 1LEs, since those are progressive rate springs.Wife and a dog, they both think they\'re Kujo.<br /> <br />1999 3.8 A4 Y87<br />Navy Blue Metallic<br />BFG G-Force KDWS 275/40/17s, <br />WS6 Wheels (17x9)<br />Phoenix Transmissions 2400 Stall Converter<br />FRA, Holley Powershot filter, Whisper Lid, Ported Throttlebody<br />2000 manifolds, Flowmaster, WS6 Tail Pipes, <br />MSD 8.5mm Wires, MSD Coils, Autolite plugs<br />Performance Cryogenics treated rotors<br />1LE Sway Bars and panhard rod, 1LE front springs w/SLP Bilsteins, stock rear springs w/ 3rd Gen Bilsteins, BMR STB, KBDD SFCs, 1LE rear lower control arms, 1LE front lower control arms<p>1968 Chevelle Malibu 327 TH350
Comment
-
Linear is much easier for the shock to control. It's mush easier to feel the car through a corner since you have same stiffness and it's not changing on you all the time. I personally prefer linear.
You're going to have one understeering car with V8 fronts and V6 rears. I doubt you're going to like it.
Comment
Latest Topics
Collapse
-
by DongrossmdI’m new. I actually don’t own a Camaro or firebird. I do have a 2000 Camaro 3.8 fly by throttle and 4l60e. This is installed in a 1980 Triumph TR7...2 weeks ago
-
by ssms5411Not much going on, replaced my Kenwood double din stereo with a Pioneer double din, the Kenwood had problems. Then replaced my power inverter for my reverse...3 weeks ago
Comment