Tweet
Which ones are better to get? I have heard one is more stronger than the oterh, can someone help me decide?
Thanks.
Joe ;)
Thanks.
Joe ;)
-
*OneQuickSix*<br />1998 3.8L V-6 Camaro<br />~A4 w/Y87~ -
I asked the exact same question a while ago (I thought someone had just TTT'd the thread I started)... in other words, have you done a search? [img]smile.gif[/img]www.RedLineVSix.com || 1996 Camaro, 15.159@92.5mph -
Dunno, I've got tubular rk sportRace car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yetComment
-
go with the BMR boxed. I would think that the boxed would have more strength.Comment
-
In equal sizes, tubular have more strength. The BMR boxed are substantially larger than the BMR tubular, so they are stronger.
Everyone seems to like their sfcs, this doesn't look like a very critical choice, except maybe to be sure they fit.
A good installation is probably more important than exactly which ones you pick.2000 Firebird convert, chameleon/tan, M5, Y87, TCS, BMR tower brace and panhard, KBDD sfcs, 245/50-16 GSCsComment
-
If you go to the BMR website, they explain the differences between boxed and tubular subframes. V6Bob was right, the boxed design is larger and will be stronger than the tubular. But, the tubular design doesn't take up as much room and there is less loss of clearance with them.
Basically...if clearance is an issue, go with the tubular design. ;)<a href=\"http://www.geocities.com/silver1997z/index.html\" target=\"_blank\">Brian</a><p>1997 Sebring Silver Z28 - clear corners, 3.73, A4, Loudmouth, K&N FIPK, 17x9 Voxx Argus, Eibach Pro-Kit, BMR adj. Panhard rod...<p><b><i>Member - WV Air National Guard</i></b>Comment
Comment