Anyone know what size theyare on a 2000 v6 and a 2000 regular Trans Am and a ws6?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
front sway bar size?
Collapse
X
-
front sway bar size?
<a href=\"http://www.fbodyelpaso.org\" target=\"_blank\">www.fbodyelpaso.org</a> A4 stock 3.42 and LSD not Y87,SLP cold air induction, whisper lid, k&n filter, flowmaster 80 series, hypertech, 160 powerstat thermostat, t/a front bumper, functional nostrils, pacesetter headers best et: 15.9 at about 4800ftTags: None
-
If you are thinking of changing out your sway bar i would sugest you uprgrade your shocks and springs first. Stiffer bars need stiffer suspension.2001 Arctic White Firebird With Black Drop Top<br /><br />3:42 Gears<br />Zexel LSD<br />BMR upper A-Arms<br />Trans Am exhaust with 3\" I-pipe and cutout<br />Modified intake<br />Mecham Hood<br />Trans Go shift kit<br />Making rear control arms and panhard
Comment
-
Well I put a ws6 sway bar on my regular T/A so now I'm just going to put the one I took off on my v6.<a href=\"http://www.fbodyelpaso.org\" target=\"_blank\">www.fbodyelpaso.org</a> A4 stock 3.42 and LSD not Y87,SLP cold air induction, whisper lid, k&n filter, flowmaster 80 series, hypertech, 160 powerstat thermostat, t/a front bumper, functional nostrils, pacesetter headers best et: 15.9 at about 4800ft
Comment
-
since its the front bar you will be fine but upgrade your shocks and springs if you want to put a bar bigger than 19mm on the rear, if you dont you will be looking for trouble.2001 Arctic White Firebird With Black Drop Top<br /><br />3:42 Gears<br />Zexel LSD<br />BMR upper A-Arms<br />Trans Am exhaust with 3\" I-pipe and cutout<br />Modified intake<br />Mecham Hood<br />Trans Go shift kit<br />Making rear control arms and panhard
Comment
-
What are the sizes for the rear?<a href=\"http://www.fbodyelpaso.org\" target=\"_blank\">www.fbodyelpaso.org</a> A4 stock 3.42 and LSD not Y87,SLP cold air induction, whisper lid, k&n filter, flowmaster 80 series, hypertech, 160 powerstat thermostat, t/a front bumper, functional nostrils, pacesetter headers best et: 15.9 at about 4800ft
Comment
-
I believe we have 15 and the v8's have 19's but early 1le cars got 21mm.2001 Arctic White Firebird With Black Drop Top<br /><br />3:42 Gears<br />Zexel LSD<br />BMR upper A-Arms<br />Trans Am exhaust with 3\" I-pipe and cutout<br />Modified intake<br />Mecham Hood<br />Trans Go shift kit<br />Making rear control arms and panhard
Comment
-
-
yup, i have had that site as one of my favorites for a while now great info. Nothing really pertinent to what is safe to run with stock v6 shocks and springs unfortunately. If you plan on upgrading your shocks and springs deffinately read that over and also i would check out www.frrax.com as well.2001 Arctic White Firebird With Black Drop Top<br /><br />3:42 Gears<br />Zexel LSD<br />BMR upper A-Arms<br />Trans Am exhaust with 3\" I-pipe and cutout<br />Modified intake<br />Mecham Hood<br />Trans Go shift kit<br />Making rear control arms and panhard
Comment
-
from personal experience a 30/19 mm setup on a stock suspensioned v6 is leaning on the oversteer side, I kind of enjoy it, been taking it through some turns hard and such.
But I coudl see some people prefering less oversteer. Might reccomend 30/17mm setup. Or a 32/19 setup. on a v6.
17mm was found on older v6s rear bars.
Either way I definitely suggest throwing at least a 30mm in the front bar, helps alot with the understeer issues 28mm front bar cars have.
I am sure some will disagree with me and i guess it varies to how people like to drive, but its what I enjoy.-Eric<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/mustangeater82\" target=\"_blank\">2000 NBM V6 Camaro 5-speed</a> T-top <i>converted</i><br /><b>14.467@95.45mph</b> <i>$0 in mods</i><br /><i>The member formerly known as MustangEater8251</i>
Comment
-
"I am sure some will disagree with me and i guess it varies to how people like to drive"
OK. :D
30/19 on stock springs is way too much oversteer. It's not a question of how you like to drive. Oversteer ain't fast. The rear wheels need some excess traction to put the power down coming out of a curve. And, in some circumstances (like rain) it's downright dangerous.
32/19 is really not different. On the front the improved camber control keeps the front stuck while the back is still loose.
On a 98+ changing the rear from 15 to 17 is a big change. I simply don't know if it's OK. Changing from 15 to 19 is a huge change that unbalances the car.2000 Firebird convert, chameleon/tan, M5, Y87, TCS, BMR tower brace and panhard, KBDD sfcs, 245/50-16 GSCs
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fred:
Anyone know what size theyare on a 2000 v6 and a 2000 regular Trans Am and a ws6?
Big as you can front sway won't hurt (35mm hollow is good) as the front suspension has very little compression to begin with - so limiting the body roll as much as posible will help out. Rear selection is more dependent on traction available and how sensitive you are to what the car is doing. The larger you go with the rear bars, the more rear traction you need along with quicker yet smoother steering ability. The good thing about bigger rear bars is the faster handling response you have. It can also be a bad thing since the car is now that much more sensitive.
Personally, I feel the huge front and rear bar setup with stock springs works fine for me and and if a mistake is made I know it really quickly. Can't imagine my Camaro being happy with a "dinky" 32mm/19mm setup. It would be too sluggish for autocross/track duty and start crying because it was handicapped! [img]tongue.gif[/img]
[ February 25, 2006, 07:49 PM: Message edited by: Vracer111 ]<a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/vracer111\" target=\"_blank\">My \'98 Camaro</a><br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.honda-tech.com/garage?cmd=viewcar&id=1223\" target=\"_blank\">My \'98 Tacoma</a>
Comment
-
Originally posted by V6Bob:
"I am sure some will disagree with me and i guess it varies to how people like to drive"
OK. :D
30/19 on stock springs is way too much oversteer. It's not a question of how you like to drive. Oversteer ain't fast. The rear wheels need some excess traction to put the power down coming out of a curve. And, in some circumstances (like rain) it's downright dangerous.
32/19 is really not different. On the front the improved camber control keeps the front stuck while the back is still loose.
On a 98+ changing the rear from 15 to 17 is a big change. I simply don't know if it's OK. Changing from 15 to 19 is a huge change that unbalances the car.
Either way ANYTHING over a 15mm rear, my car was a freaking understeering snow plow.
As for dangerous in the rain, I have been in worse rain then most have you have ever seen, on some pretty bald tires, and it wasn't "dangerous" I mean granted with better tires I coudl have stuck better but its not like a take a turn at normal speeds and start flying into the ditch doing 360s.-Eric<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/mustangeater82\" target=\"_blank\">2000 NBM V6 Camaro 5-speed</a> T-top <i>converted</i><br /><b>14.467@95.45mph</b> <i>$0 in mods</i><br /><i>The member formerly known as MustangEater8251</i>
Comment
Comment