free rear lowering mod... - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

free rear lowering mod...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    come on guys post some pics, im really wanna see some pics of this before i try it.
    -Chris<br />2001 Pewter Camaro M5<br />Current Mods: NOS Dry Kit and a few others<br />N/A: 15.5@88.9MPH<br />N2O: ??? <br /> <a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/jtusa69888\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.cardomain.com/id/jtusa69888</a>

    Comment


    • #17
      <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by AZv6camaro:
      come on guys post some pics, im really wanna see some pics of this before i try it.<hr></blockquote>

      What? Pics of the garden hose and spring, or pics of it lowered?? If you wanna see it lowered have your two fatest friends sit in the back seat [img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img]
      ~Derrick <a href=\"http://www.appstate.edu/~do54457/\" target=\"_blank\"><i>My Webpage</i></a><br /><b>\'96 3.8L V6 M5 Firebird Y87</b> | <b>162.8 RWHP</b> / <b>196.7 RWTQ</b> <br /><b>•</b> SLP CAI <b>•</b> <a href=\"http://tech.firebirdv6.com/y87.html\" target=\"_blank\"><b>Y87</b> Package</a> - 3.23s <b>•</b> 180º thermo w/ fan switch <b>•</b> TB spacer from DEE<br />1991 Jeep Cherokee Laredo 4x4

      Comment


      • #18
        Please tell me people are not going to try this ...................
        Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
        nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
        2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
        2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

        Comment


        • #19
          <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Dojo2000:


          What? Pics of the garden hose and spring, or pics of it lowered?? If you wanna see it lowered have your two fatest friends sit in the back seat [img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img]
          <hr></blockquote>

          LOL good call...yea i really dont think im going to do it, cuz if im gonna go threw the time to take the spring out, i rather put in a new one thats ment to lower the car. Im just curious to whether it will make the back look lower then the front or make it look even.

          [ July 25, 2002: Message edited by: AZv6camaro ]</p>
          -Chris<br />2001 Pewter Camaro M5<br />Current Mods: NOS Dry Kit and a few others<br />N/A: 15.5@88.9MPH<br />N2O: ??? <br /> <a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/jtusa69888\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.cardomain.com/id/jtusa69888</a>

          Comment


          • #20
            Talkin about ghetto riggin... [img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img]
            <b>99 Camaro Z28 A4</b><br />R.I.P. 00 Firebird 3.8<br />14.89 @ 90, 2.03 60\'

            Comment


            • #21
              Just to inform those interested in this mod, I took it off today to inspect for wear and check height differences. I have had this on the car for atleast two months. There was a little dirt built up on the hose, but didn't look to be much wear. There were absolutely no markings or dents on the frame/mounting area on the car itself. I removed the hose and reinstalled the factory isolators to check both ride height and ride quality. Both measurements were taken today with about a 1/4 tank of gas. With the hose installed, the ride heights were 28-1/8" and 27-3/4" for the drivers side and passengers side rear wheel wells. After replacing the isolators and driving for a few minutes to make sure they were fully seated, the ride heights were 28-3/4" and 28-3/8". So that is a 5/8" difference on both sides.

              The ride noise and quality were really close. I could tell is was slightly quiter and a bit more "isolated", for lack of a better term, with the spacers on the car. But these differences were only apparent because I had driven the car 1/2 hour earlier. The back to back nature of the test made it more apparent. You would not be able to tell which was which simply by riding with me once.

              So, its about a 1/2" drop for "free". No real performance differences, and no visible wear and tear after 2+ months. Hopefully that will help you make your decisions, based on some actual experience and not someone's "opinion". If you think your car is just a bit too high in the back, then you may want to try this out. It is certainly cheaper than new springs. However, if you want a significant drop, or both the front and rear need to be lowered, you will probably be disappointed with the results.

              [ July 27, 2002: Message edited by: Backfire ]</p>

              Comment


              • #22
                this page is hallarius.. i think i will go ghetto ..i have spent too much this year already!---the worst that could happen i would have to put the spacer back in..what is the biggest differece between the pro kit and the eibach sportsline-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Originally posted by AZv6camaro:
                come on guys post some pics, im really wanna see some pics of this before i try it.
                --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                What? Pics of the garden hose and spring, or pics of it lowered?? If you wanna see it lowered have your two fatest friends sit in the back seat

                --------------------

                e already spent oo

                Comment

                Latest Topics

                Collapse

                There are no results that meet this criteria.

                FORUM SPONSORS

                Collapse
                Working...
                X