For all you MATH gurus - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

For all you MATH gurus

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • For all you MATH gurus

    If you are good with math and word problems, you should love this one.
    I am trying to figure out how much of a distance I lost by. I was bracket racing Saturday and lost by .0002 sec. What does this equal to in distance??? Here is the break down

    11.72 ____Dial in____ 15.06
    .1058_______RT_______ .0698
    11.7340____1/4 ______ 15.1102
    118.30____1/4 mph____ 88.86
    .0140 ____off dial___ .0502
    WINNER
    .0002 <<<<< Finish Margin

    I am thinking a few inches at the finish line.
    Thanks
    New Toy Red 94 Formula LT1
    RT: .0006 60': 1.894 1/8 mile: 8.351 @ 84.89 1/4 mile: 12.974 @ 107.81
    crashed Red 96 Camaro 3.8l: 14.91 @ 92.38
    The ex wife's Black 98 Firebird 3.8l: 15.23 @ 88.12

  • #2
    Man...

    that sucks... I am not even sure where to start calculating on that but I can say this...


    If you just bounced in your car down the track, you would have won. [img]tongue.gif[/img]

    rough f-body rule of thumb... 1/10th = carlength.

    You are talking such minimilist a distance, I'd say there is a 50% chance you won because teh equipment isn't calibrated to that kind of accuracy. [img]smile.gif[/img]

    bet that was an exciting race though [img]smile.gif[/img]
    -Eric<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/mustangeater82\" target=\"_blank\">2000 NBM V6 Camaro 5-speed</a> T-top <i>converted</i><br /><b>14.467@95.45mph</b> <i>$0 in mods</i><br /><i>The member formerly known as MustangEater8251</i>

    Comment


    • #3
      Its something in the neighborhood of a 1/4 or 1/2 inch.

      Comment


      • #4
        well what I got for what its worth...
        at 118.30 mph
        he would be covering .416416 inches in .0002 seconds
        at 88.86 mph
        you would be covering .3127872 inches in .0002 seconds
        not sure if my figures are right, but thats what I did

        explanation:
        118.3 mph convert to miles per second
        multiply mps by .0002
        then multiply by 5,280 feet in a mile, then by 12 inches in a foot to get distance traveled
        did that for both
        not sure if thats the right way...
        but what it looks like is you lost by less than half an inch
        sweet
        millionformarriage.org

        Why stop people from getting married?

        Comment


        • #5
          I got numbers slightly higher than LD because I used a different method.

          Miles Per Hour converts to Feet Per Second by multiplying by 1.5

          So 118.30x1.5 = 177.45

          x 12 = 2129.4 for inches per second

          x .0002 = .42588 inches traveled in .0002 seconds.

          By this same method, you were traveling .319896 for every .00002 seconds.

          So you lost by about 1/3 of an inch. It took you .0002 seconds to cross the finish line after he crossed, so we use your rate to find the distance behind, not his.
          <b><a href=\"http://members.cox.net/95batmobile/d86f.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Sinister Six©</b></a><br /><a href=\"http://www.sounddomain.com/id/95batmobile\" target=\"_blank\">My \'95 Bird</a><br />I am not afraid of storms, for I am learning how to sail my ship.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by 95Batmobile:

            Miles Per Hour converts to Feet Per Second by multiplying by 1.5
            how does this work?
            must be a rough calculation I assume?
            this is prob where our numbers got different, but you basically did the same thing
            but I got 173.506666666... fps
            118.3/60 min
            ans/60 sec
            ans * 5,280 feet in a mile
            millionformarriage.org

            Why stop people from getting married?

            Comment


            • #7
              i think this problem cannot be solved accurately enough for 2 reasons

              1) at a track you have pre stage and stage lights and the your time begins once your wheels pass the stage laser. that is why sometimes the person with the slower time wins because its about who crosses the finish first, but since it was that close i dont think that matters

              2) you have an initial velocity and the final velocity, you can only find average velocity and average distance covered a sec. but the velocity is not linear due to acceleration. shaped like haf a parabola. also instentanious acceleration at ne point is unkown so you dont know how much someone pulled mid way

              but if its as small as 1/1000th of a sec, just call it a inch or so
              -RJ \"Like trail mix I\'m a lil sweet but mostly nutty\"<br />Metallic Blue 2001 3.8 Firebird M5<br />FRA,Smoothed Air lid, Homedepot Intake, K&N Air Filter, MSD Coils & Plug wires, Iridium Plugs, Flash Tune, 2.5 Flowmaster Catback.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by RicE-ter:
                i think this problem cannot be solved accurately enough for 2 reasons

                1) at a track you have pre stage and stage lights and the your time begins once your wheels pass the stage laser. that is why sometimes the person with the slower time wins because its about who crosses the finish first, but since it was that close i dont think that matters

                2) you have an initial velocity and the final velocity, you can only find average velocity and average distance covered a sec. but the velocity is not linear due to acceleration. shaped like haf a parabola. also instentanious acceleration at ne point is unkown so you dont know how much someone pulled mid way

                but if its as small as 1/1000th of a sec, just call it a inch or so
                1 is a given
                2 the acceleration involved in .0002 of a second would hardly weigh the values that much, we were discussing the end result, not the average along the way
                millionformarriage.org

                Why stop people from getting married?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by RicE-ter:
                  i think this problem cannot be solved accurately enough for 2 reasons

                  1) at a track you have pre stage and stage lights and the your time begins once your wheels pass the stage laser. that is why sometimes the person with the slower time wins because its about who crosses the finish first, but since it was that close i dont think that matters

                  2) you have an initial velocity and the final velocity, you can only find average velocity and average distance covered a sec. but the velocity is not linear due to acceleration. shaped like haf a parabola. also instentanious acceleration at ne point is unkown so you dont know how much someone pulled mid way

                  but if its as small as 1/1000th of a sec, just call it a inch or so
                  YEah uhm, acceleration is not shaped like half a parabola.

                  And LD is right, in .0002 seconds there will not be enough of a change in speed to change out numbers.

                  And yeah, 1.5 is a rough estimate of mph to feet/sec
                  <b><a href=\"http://members.cox.net/95batmobile/d86f.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Sinister Six©</b></a><br /><a href=\"http://www.sounddomain.com/id/95batmobile\" target=\"_blank\">My \'95 Bird</a><br />I am not afraid of storms, for I am learning how to sail my ship.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    i know i sed velocity is, due to acceleration

                    just sayin its not gunna be all that accurate with whats given, then again i dont know how precise ne of us need to be. ne way im not one to fuss over 1 or 2 thousandth of a sec, wwheter it be 1/4 or a 1/3 of an inch

                    yah i see that now, reading my own post its like, duh. but yah if the time difference is so small i think we can just imagine how small that would be ne way

                    [ June 28, 2005, 02:38 AM: Message edited by: RicE-ter ]
                    -RJ \"Like trail mix I\'m a lil sweet but mostly nutty\"<br />Metallic Blue 2001 3.8 Firebird M5<br />FRA,Smoothed Air lid, Homedepot Intake, K&N Air Filter, MSD Coils & Plug wires, Iridium Plugs, Flash Tune, 2.5 Flowmaster Catback.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I called it....somewhere between a 1/4 and 1/2 of an inch.

                      Boo-yah

                      And im right also...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Winning is winning.. It doesnt matter if its by a inch or a mile.. :D :D
                        Jeff ..
                        1998 Firebird.. Built 3.8 with a 125 shot.. 370rwhp,415rwtq.. stock tune!! sold

                        2002 WS6 T/A.. Bolt ins..448rwhp
                        2009 G8 GT.. Vararam intake, GXP axleback
                        1998 Corvette.. Vararam intake, Ti axleback
                        http://www.fquick.com/slow-v6

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          seeing some other calculations, on other boards, I have come to the conclusion that I lost by .0002 sec or approx 1/3 of an inch.

                          Damn that was too close.
                          But I do appreciate everyones help on this.
                          New Toy Red 94 Formula LT1
                          RT: .0006 60': 1.894 1/8 mile: 8.351 @ 84.89 1/4 mile: 12.974 @ 107.81
                          crashed Red 96 Camaro 3.8l: 14.91 @ 92.38
                          The ex wife's Black 98 Firebird 3.8l: 15.23 @ 88.12

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            :eek:
                            1995 Patriot Red T-Topped Z28 A4<br /><br />Mystery rebuild in progress.<br /><br />Soon to have 383 ways to beat KBreezy and Shane. :D

                            Comment

                            Latest Topics

                            Collapse

                            FORUM SPONSORS

                            Collapse
                            Working...
                            X