Pics of the new Supersucker "track' lower airbox - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pics of the new Supersucker "track' lower airbox

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pics of the new Supersucker "track' lower airbox

    Just got these from the manufacturer today. I pulled the SS out of storage and attached it. I crept out of the alley and hit the highway. It felt awesome :eek: I really noticed a difference. These are plastic welded like the new Supersuckers. These will be sold seperately for those who already have a Supersucker. Or you can buy the complete CAI kit that includes both lower airboxes. The street version for daily driving and the track version for hitting the strip. Also they will also be sold as street kits or track kits. The great thing about this is when you leave the track, take it off and run with the top CAI box Since the top box is very similar to SLP's,Whispers or, FTRA you still get the benefit of CAI for daily driving if you chose not to get the street lower airbox. Contact LM Performance, or Speed Inc or e-mail me at albert0155@aol.com for more info.

    Here's the links for the pics

    www.buickwe4.com/pic/DSC00023.jpg
    www.buickwe4.com/pic/DSC00021.jpg
    www.buickwe4.com/pic/DSC00012.jpg

    Thanks to Jon at Speed Inc for creating these links for me.

    [ February 26, 2003: Message edited by: SS1LE02 ]</p>
    <a href=\"http://www.austinperformanceinc.com\" target=\"_blank\">www.austinperformanceinc.com</a><p>2002SS blk, M6, 4.10\'s, comp cam 224/.581/112LSA, TPIS LT headers, SLP lid, Super Sucker Ram Air, Qwik Stick. No T-tops, ASR is my foot.<br />394rwhp/380rwtq

  • #2
    damn that looks like a frikking snowplow!!!!!! hehe. i'll be that sucks a damn big load of air in.
    you can\'t get off if you don\'t get on

    Comment


    • #3
      Animals and small children beware. You have ram air so why switch to that sort of intake?
      <b> \'95 Camaro 3.4L A4 <i>Rikku</i><br />AutoX - Drift - Street </b><br />\"Sideways is faster.\"

      Comment


      • #4
        Thats a bit extreme isn't it? Tell the rocks hello for me [img]smile.gif[/img]
        2002 5-spd NBM Camaro
        Details: www.1lev6.com

        Comment


        • #5
          <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Dominic:
          Thats a bit extreme isn't it? Tell the rocks hello for me [img]smile.gif[/img] <hr></blockquote>

          Remember, it's for the track only. Squirrels, rabbits, and small dogs

          [img]graemlins/toto.gif[/img] beware.
          i can't wait for the track to open so I can compare it to the regular street version of the Supersucker.
          <a href=\"http://www.austinperformanceinc.com\" target=\"_blank\">www.austinperformanceinc.com</a><p>2002SS blk, M6, 4.10\'s, comp cam 224/.581/112LSA, TPIS LT headers, SLP lid, Super Sucker Ram Air, Qwik Stick. No T-tops, ASR is my foot.<br />394rwhp/380rwtq

          Comment


          • #6
            that is bad *** . i gotta rig me one of thoes...

            Comment


            • #7
              can we get just the extention? like if we have a rksport ram air, or a FTRA?

              Comment


              • #8
                <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Brett Garret:
                Animals and small children beware. You have ram air so why switch to that sort of intake?<hr></blockquote>

                Well - the factory "ram air" isn't anything special. It is more of a cool air to engine system because on the SS it has to wrap around before it goes into the airbox.

                i know with my ftra, the airbox is sealed except for where the air comes in from the bottom of the car....this is more efficient...

                also, here is my question about this "new" set up....if the gap where the air is coming in is still the normal size, who cares how big the scoop is? To me, it doesn't seem like it matters.
                *MATT* <p>98 Camaro SS #1767 A4<br />Artic White<br />Not stock...<p>Former car:<br />96 Firebird Y87 A4<br />Bright Red<br />Wasn\'t stock...

                Comment


                • #9
                  The first pic was enough for me. My goodness.
                  <b>1998 Firebird 3800 Series II, A4</b><br />Direct-Flo Lid,K&N Filter,DEE TB Spacer,TPS-TEC,ZZP Mini-AFC,Raised and Cutout Airbox 7mm,BMR STB & Boxed LCAs,KYB AGX Shocks,Drilled/Slotted Rotors,180* Thermo,2.5\" Catco Cat,Dynomax 2.75\" custom catback,Kumho Ecstas/245,Jet Stage 2,3.42,Edge Racing 2870 Stall,B&M Tranny Cooler,B&M Deep Tranny Pan,LSD,AAM Girdle,1LE DS,NX Wet Kit,MSD DIS-4,MSD Blaster Coil Packs,Taylor Spiro Pro 8mm Wires,NGK TR6\'S gapped .045,ZZP UD WP Pulley,SLP Fan Switch,TT II\'s<br />N/A: 15.6342 @ 88.44 (On stock converter. Strugglin\' to beat it.)<br />Nitrous 50 Shot: 14.7463 @ 93.49

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by mw02:


                    Well - the factory "ram air" isn't anything special. It is more of a cool air to engine system because on the SS it has to wrap around before it goes into the airbox.

                    i know with my ftra, the airbox is sealed except for where the air comes in from the bottom of the car....this is more efficient...

                    also, here is my question about this "new" set up....if the gap where the air is coming in is still the normal size, who cares how big the scoop is? To me, it doesn't seem like it matters.
                    <hr></blockquote>

                    I think it is a good idea, but when does the loss of aerodynamics outweigh the hp gain.
                    Have you ever stuck you hand out the window at 50mph, and twisted it back and forth. Im sure you noticed the resistance on your hand when it was cupped foward. I do relize that the difference is that the air does pass through the tubing and into the engine, but how much?
                    Cardomain

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I don't know about the aerodynamics. I just know I felt a difference when I took it out on the freeway. It accelerated better.
                      <a href=\"http://www.austinperformanceinc.com\" target=\"_blank\">www.austinperformanceinc.com</a><p>2002SS blk, M6, 4.10\'s, comp cam 224/.581/112LSA, TPIS LT headers, SLP lid, Super Sucker Ram Air, Qwik Stick. No T-tops, ASR is my foot.<br />394rwhp/380rwtq

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        These have been around for forever on the Impala SS side, under the trade name RAMMIT. Universal compliments over the power gains. LOT of complaints over sucking up water (can you say hydrolock?), pine needles, leaves, rocks, parking bumpers (they break so often you can buy the scoop seperately), etc.. etc..

                        I'd never mount one on my ride. Sorry.
                        Kelly \'GhoSSt\' Rosato<br />1996 Impala SS, 385ci LT4, 52mm TB, Quad1 headers, !Cats, !EGR, !AIR, Hooker Catback, SLP TC, UK3, UL0, GM CD changer, Onstar®, Homelink® Remote, lots of Fleetwood, Denali & 9C1 Stuff.<br />1998 Z28 Convertable (stock at the moment)<br />1993 Caprice 9C1, 406ci MPFI, overhead console, 8-way Riviera seats, DVD, CD Changer, etc..<br />1977 Volvo w/ 3.8l V6 from a 1998 Firebird

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by mw02:
                          Well - the factory "ram air" isn't anything special. It is more of a cool air to engine system because on the SS it has to wrap around before it goes into the airbox.

                          i know with my ftra, the airbox is sealed except for where the air comes in from the bottom of the car....this is more efficient...

                          also, here is my question about this "new" set up....if the gap where the air is coming in is still the normal size, who cares how big the scoop is? To me, it doesn't seem like it matters.
                          <hr></blockquote>

                          It doesn't matter if it is sealed... air isn't compressable at normal subsonic street speeds [img]smile.gif[/img]
                          Matt<br />2000 Firebird<br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.fullthrottlev6.com/forums/index.php?\" target=\"_blank\">FullThrottleV6.com</a>

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I installed semething similar to mrjuice's Ls1 00 but it was not extreme.
                            I am forgetting the name of it.
                            It had a normal version and then a track addition extension....
                            He gained 2 mph at the track if I am correct
                            Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
                            nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
                            2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
                            2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I think they went overboard with that one. [img]graemlins/thumbsdown.gif[/img]
                              -Eric<br />2002 Navy Blue Camaro...Striped and Stalled. 35th Anniversary SS wheels <br />Best ET: 15.384 @ 88.32 on street tires<br />Project Whitney: Goal, 14.0 1/4 by summer 2008.

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              FORUM SPONSORS

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X