wet or dry - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

wet or dry

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • wet or dry

    wandering wich one should i use wet or dry setup i have the money now im just deciding on what setup to run. any input i would apreciate

  • #2
    Jave you tried to search this forum yet?? What all do you have done with your car??
    Jeff ..
    1998 Firebird.. Built 3.8 with a 125 shot.. 370rwhp,415rwtq.. stock tune!! sold

    2002 WS6 T/A.. Bolt ins..448rwhp
    2009 G8 GT.. Vararam intake, GXP axleback
    1998 Corvette.. Vararam intake, Ti axleback
    http://www.fquick.com/slow-v6

    Comment


    • #3
      Cody, a wet kit might be best for your car....easier install if you don't wanna pay to have it done...but wet kits sure are fun too...gonna get it from TSP?
      <a href=\"http://www.fullthrottlev6.com\" target=\"_blank\">www.fullthrottlev6.com</a> THE SOURCE!

      Comment


      • #4
        <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by 1998silverbird:
        Jave you tried to search this forum yet?? What all do you have done with your car??<hr></blockquote>

        Yeah, what he said.
        NOS dry kit 5175 is the easiest and simplest in my opinion
        Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
        nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
        2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
        2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

        Comment


        • #5
          But on a stock car wouldn't a wet kit be safer?

          Comment


          • #6
            No.
            Our intake manifolds are not designed for fuel.
            Air only.
            Wet kits can have MASSIVE nitrous backfires!
            Safest, and I use that term loosely, would be a dry nitrous kit using a small to moderate shot level
            Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
            nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
            2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
            2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

            Comment


            • #7
              <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by 12secondv6:


              Yeah, what he said.
              <hr></blockquote>

              exactly.. Hey the j is next to the h on the keyboard.. Doesnt a dry kit have a better chance of leaning out then a wet kit.. I heard that on stock injectors and fuel system that a dry kit is hard on it.. I am not as familiar with N2O as James but I know I would rather have a backfire than burn pistons.. Thats why I went with a wet kit spraying a 50 shot. well that and the fact that I got the kit, bottle warmer, purge, and a bottle psi gage on the bottle and a autometer psi gage for 400.00. I already burned a piston ring and spun a bearing in my first motor N/A due to lost oil pressure. But Nitrous is dangerouse no matter what type of settup you have..

              [ May 09, 2003: Message edited by: 1998silverbird ]

              [ May 09, 2003: Message edited by: 1998silverbird ]</p>
              Jeff ..
              1998 Firebird.. Built 3.8 with a 125 shot.. 370rwhp,415rwtq.. stock tune!! sold

              2002 WS6 T/A.. Bolt ins..448rwhp
              2009 G8 GT.. Vararam intake, GXP axleback
              1998 Corvette.. Vararam intake, Ti axleback
              http://www.fquick.com/slow-v6

              Comment


              • #8
                I think a dry shot is better anyway, easier to tune without worrying about backfiring as much. I got a bottle of Nitrous Express with my tax return money but my car has over 100k miles on it. So it will have to wait. :D
                97 Camaro RS<br /><br />\"Just a V6 huh?, let\'s go find out how slow it is\"

                Comment


                • #9
                  well i ended up buying an NOS kit off of ebay. i went dry. the kit number is 05100NOS. and it comes with three jets they are 32 34 36. my question is what hp are those jets.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by 97 30th RS:
                    I think a dry shot is better anyway, easier to tune without worrying about backfiring as much. <hr></blockquote>

                    Nope, with a nitrous jet and a fuel jet, you can actually do a little fine tuning on the A/F ratio...dry you cannot. So how again is a dry kit easier to tune???
                    <a href=\"http://www.fullthrottlev6.com\" target=\"_blank\">www.fullthrottlev6.com</a> THE SOURCE!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by 2000v6bird:
                      well i ended up buying an NOS kit off of ebay. i went dry. the kit number is 05100NOS. and it comes with three jets they are 32 34 36. my question is what hp are those jets.<hr></blockquote>

                      I don't know exactly on the smaller sizes, but I think:
                      32 jet is 30hp
                      34 jet is 40hp
                      36 jet is 50hp

                      To go on up from there:
                      47 jet is 85hp
                      63 jet is 120hp
                      \'98 A4 Camaro v6-&gt;v8 conversion, and STS kit next<br />v6: 13.6 Powerdyne, 13.2 150 shot, 13.8 120 shot, 14.3 85 shot, 15.7 stock<br />v8(na): 12.18@113, 392rwhp<br />Moderator on <a href=\"http://www.mtfba.org\" target=\"_blank\">www.mtfba.org</a> and <a href=\"http://www.frrax.com\" target=\"_blank\">www.frrax.com</a> (Road Race & Autocross)<br /><a href=\"http://community.webshots.com/user/johnduncan10\" target=\"_blank\">Car pics</a>, <a href=\"http://www.trscca.com\" target=\"_blank\">TN Region SCCA</a>

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Because if you run a wet kit and you don't have an adequate fuel supply the chance of an engine damaging backfire is greater. A dry kit like a 50 or 75 shot doesn't need as much attention to tune as a wet kit. I agree that a wet kit is a better performer than a dry kit but that advantage comes with a little higher chance of hurting the motor.
                        97 Camaro RS<br /><br />\"Just a V6 huh?, let\'s go find out how slow it is\"

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by OneQuickV6:


                          Nope, with a nitrous jet and a fuel jet, you can actually do a little fine tuning on the A/F ratio...dry you cannot. So how again is a dry kit easier to tune???
                          <hr></blockquote>
                          Um, adjust jets?
                          Dry or wet can be dyno tuned.
                          Nitrous jets be it nitrous and fuel on a wet kit or nitrous and bypass on a dry kit
                          Anything can be tuned or adjusted.

                          Dry kit is 'safer'
                          'safer' &lt;--- there is NO safety with nitrous!!!

                          Wet kit backfire HUGE amount of damage!!!
                          Dry kit backfire not too much damage at all!!!

                          Trust me on that
                          Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
                          nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
                          2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
                          2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            so how would i find out exactly what "shot" the jets are. a website or something i could go to

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Call NOS and speak with a tech there
                              Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
                              nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
                              2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
                              2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              There are no results that meet this criteria.

                              FORUM SPONSORS

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X