wandering wich one should i use wet or dry setup i have the money now im just deciding on what setup to run. any input i would apreciate
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
wet or dry
Collapse
X
-
Jave you tried to search this forum yet?? What all do you have done with your car??Jeff ..
1998 Firebird.. Built 3.8 with a 125 shot.. 370rwhp,415rwtq.. stock tune!! sold
2002 WS6 T/A.. Bolt ins..448rwhp
2009 G8 GT.. Vararam intake, GXP axleback
1998 Corvette.. Vararam intake, Ti axleback
http://www.fquick.com/slow-v6
-
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by 1998silverbird:
Jave you tried to search this forum yet?? What all do you have done with your car??<hr></blockquote>
Yeah, what he said.
NOS dry kit 5175 is the easiest and simplest in my opinionRace car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet
Comment
-
No.
Our intake manifolds are not designed for fuel.
Air only.
Wet kits can have MASSIVE nitrous backfires!
Safest, and I use that term loosely, would be a dry nitrous kit using a small to moderate shot levelRace car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet
Comment
-
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by 12secondv6:
Yeah, what he said.
<hr></blockquote>
exactly.. Hey the j is next to the h on the keyboard.. Doesnt a dry kit have a better chance of leaning out then a wet kit.. I heard that on stock injectors and fuel system that a dry kit is hard on it.. I am not as familiar with N2O as James but I know I would rather have a backfire than burn pistons.. Thats why I went with a wet kit spraying a 50 shot. well that and the fact that I got the kit, bottle warmer, purge, and a bottle psi gage on the bottle and a autometer psi gage for 400.00. I already burned a piston ring and spun a bearing in my first motor N/A due to lost oil pressure. But Nitrous is dangerouse no matter what type of settup you have..
[ May 09, 2003: Message edited by: 1998silverbird ]
[ May 09, 2003: Message edited by: 1998silverbird ]</p>Jeff ..
1998 Firebird.. Built 3.8 with a 125 shot.. 370rwhp,415rwtq.. stock tune!! sold
2002 WS6 T/A.. Bolt ins..448rwhp
2009 G8 GT.. Vararam intake, GXP axleback
1998 Corvette.. Vararam intake, Ti axleback
http://www.fquick.com/slow-v6
Comment
-
I think a dry shot is better anyway, easier to tune without worrying about backfiring as much. I got a bottle of Nitrous Express with my tax return money but my car has over 100k miles on it. So it will have to wait. :D97 Camaro RS<br /><br />\"Just a V6 huh?, let\'s go find out how slow it is\"
Comment
-
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by 97 30th RS:
I think a dry shot is better anyway, easier to tune without worrying about backfiring as much. <hr></blockquote>
Nope, with a nitrous jet and a fuel jet, you can actually do a little fine tuning on the A/F ratio...dry you cannot. So how again is a dry kit easier to tune???<a href=\"http://www.fullthrottlev6.com\" target=\"_blank\">www.fullthrottlev6.com</a> THE SOURCE!
Comment
-
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by 2000v6bird:
well i ended up buying an NOS kit off of ebay. i went dry. the kit number is 05100NOS. and it comes with three jets they are 32 34 36. my question is what hp are those jets.<hr></blockquote>
I don't know exactly on the smaller sizes, but I think:
32 jet is 30hp
34 jet is 40hp
36 jet is 50hp
To go on up from there:
47 jet is 85hp
63 jet is 120hp\'98 A4 Camaro v6->v8 conversion, and STS kit next<br />v6: 13.6 Powerdyne, 13.2 150 shot, 13.8 120 shot, 14.3 85 shot, 15.7 stock<br />v8(na): 12.18@113, 392rwhp<br />Moderator on <a href=\"http://www.mtfba.org\" target=\"_blank\">www.mtfba.org</a> and <a href=\"http://www.frrax.com\" target=\"_blank\">www.frrax.com</a> (Road Race & Autocross)<br /><a href=\"http://community.webshots.com/user/johnduncan10\" target=\"_blank\">Car pics</a>, <a href=\"http://www.trscca.com\" target=\"_blank\">TN Region SCCA</a>
Comment
-
Because if you run a wet kit and you don't have an adequate fuel supply the chance of an engine damaging backfire is greater. A dry kit like a 50 or 75 shot doesn't need as much attention to tune as a wet kit. I agree that a wet kit is a better performer than a dry kit but that advantage comes with a little higher chance of hurting the motor.97 Camaro RS<br /><br />\"Just a V6 huh?, let\'s go find out how slow it is\"
Comment
-
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by OneQuickV6:
Nope, with a nitrous jet and a fuel jet, you can actually do a little fine tuning on the A/F ratio...dry you cannot. So how again is a dry kit easier to tune???<hr></blockquote>
Um, adjust jets?
Dry or wet can be dyno tuned.
Nitrous jets be it nitrous and fuel on a wet kit or nitrous and bypass on a dry kit
Anything can be tuned or adjusted.
Dry kit is 'safer'
'safer' <--- there is NO safety with nitrous!!!
Wet kit backfire HUGE amount of damage!!!
Dry kit backfire not too much damage at all!!!
Trust me on thatRace car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet
Comment
Comment