Windows XP Professional x64 Edition....!!!!! vary soon!!!!!!!!!! - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Windows XP Professional x64 Edition....!!!!! vary soon!!!!!!!!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    eh, so what does this mean exactly?

    "Money can't buy me happiness, but I'm happiest when I can buy what I want"
    05' CTS-V
    00' Camaro - SOLD :(

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by nikon:
      eh, so what does this mean exactly?
      basically better graphics for gamers

      faster running pc... able to add much much more ram and HUGE hard ddrives
      www.turbov6camaro.com
      1997 3800 Series II Camaro
      4600 Stall for my ride to the mall :chug:
      7.18 @ 99.77 1/8 -1.8x sixty (current quickest v6 fbod)
      11.23 @ unk 5 1/4 - 7.19 1/8 - 1.83 sixty

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by viper04af:
        </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by nikon:
        eh, so what does this mean exactly?
        basically better graphics for gamers

        faster running pc... able to add much much more ram and HUGE hard ddrives
        </font>[/QUOTE]I think the real benefit, at least immediately, will be to servers and beefy desktop applications, not games. 64 bit registers means a 64 bit data bus and a 64 bit address bus and thus the ability to not only address more memory, but to move twice as much data per clock cycle.

        Game performance will almost always be bottlenecked on the video card and GPU, not the system board and processor (provided it's fast enough to execute the game loop without maxing out). There are and have been rare and short periods between video card generations where the bottleneck was moved back to the CPU, but this isn't the case in general.

        There is no question, though, that the current architecture (especially AGP) will be limiting in the coming years insofar as graphics performance, and the advent of PCI-E is a step in the right direction (increasing interface clock speed) and it will continue to evolve.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by viper04af:
          and Tealv6 this is good news for you [img]graemlins/stickpoke.gif[/img] linux users toooo not that you matter that much
          What's so good about it for me?? Not like we'll use it at work anytime soon...

          Besides...
          512MB PC3200 (400MHz) Supports up to 8GB
          Until it ships... Apple still works more... And we still have Tiger coming next month [img]graemlins/stickpoke.gif[/img]
          FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Administrator
          Stupid is rewarded with the ban button.
          Official Avatar Nazi according to Meatyshells :D

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Infernal:
            </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by viper04af:
            </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by nikon:
            eh, so what does this mean exactly?
            basically better graphics for gamers

            faster running pc... able to add much much more ram and HUGE hard ddrives
            </font>[/QUOTE]I think the real benefit, at least immediately, will be to servers and beefy desktop applications, not games. 64 bit registers means a 64 bit data bus and a 64 bit address bus and thus the ability to not only address more memory, but to move twice as much data per clock cycle.

            Game performance will almost always be bottlenecked on the video card and GPU, not the system board and processor (provided it's fast enough to execute the game loop without maxing out). There are and have been rare and short periods between video card generations where the bottleneck was moved back to the CPU, but this isn't the case in general.

            There is no question, though, that the current architecture (especially AGP) will be limiting in the coming years insofar as graphics performance, and the advent of PCI-E is a step in the right direction (increasing interface clock speed) and it will continue to evolve.
            </font>[/QUOTE]thats where SLI comes in 2 graphics card working for the same goal......... and AGP is WAY out dated... look at al lthe top of the line boards there all PCI-E
            www.turbov6camaro.com
            1997 3800 Series II Camaro
            4600 Stall for my ride to the mall :chug:
            7.18 @ 99.77 1/8 -1.8x sixty (current quickest v6 fbod)
            11.23 @ unk 5 1/4 - 7.19 1/8 - 1.83 sixty

            Comment


            • #21
              it will mean faster games. they will be able to take more advantage of faster access to memory. while you're right about the vid card being the bottleneck area on high end games, a transfer to 64 bit will still provide some gain. even with 'normal' mother boards, even with AGP, the gfx card does not take full advantage of the badwidth provided. PCI-E is just a new interface, gfx card makers still havent unlocked its bandwidth capabilites either.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by viper04af:
                AGP is WAY out dated... look at al lthe top of the line boards there all PCI-E
                I have a top of the line board (6800 GT). AGP 8x has more than enough bandwidth. The reason the new cards are PCI-E is because the new boards are PCI-E. It takes time to phase out old architectures. [img]smile.gif[/img]

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by mike h:
                  </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by C.O.Jones:
                  </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by mike h:
                  My computer hasn't blue-screened ... ever

                  I guess XP is just cool like that. :cool:
                  Easy way to blue screen. Use a USB ethernet connector. Knock it lose while tranferring data on the network. BOOM, blue screen.

                  Don't stop the USB device properly and remove.... BOOM blue screen.
                  </font>[/QUOTE]Get a $5 network card. Problem solved! :cool:
                  </font>[/QUOTE]1) $5 network card? Try $25.
                  2) Using laptops at work with one internal NIC card. Needed to hook up a second network (stand alone, no trust relationship between 1st and 2nd network). Either everyone gets PCIB network cards or we use USB Ethernet adapters. Long term, USB was the way to go - can move to other applications if needed.
                  <a href=\"http://members.cox.net/95batmobile/d86f.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Sinister Six</a> <br /><b><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/c_o_jones\" target=\"_blank\">Cardomain</a></b><br />--This doesn\'t change the fact that I am ~The Guru~ who still kicks puppies...

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by C.O.Jones:
                    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by mike h:
                    My computer hasn't blue-screened ... ever

                    I guess XP is just cool like that. :cool:
                    Easy way to blue screen. Use a USB ethernet connector. Knock it lose while tranferring data on the network. BOOM, blue screen.

                    Don't stop the USB device properly and remove.... BOOM blue screen.
                    </font>[/QUOTE]wow :rolleyes:

                    Comment

                    Latest Topics

                    Collapse

                    There are no results that meet this criteria.

                    FORUM SPONSORS

                    Collapse
                    Working...
                    X