Welcome to the FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I just dont see how setting the PE even lower is a good idea.
Like for instance (and maybe I'm not fully understanding), but I am commanding 12.5 at WOT, but only getting 13.5 actual...you are suggesting that I command 11.5 instead?
Over time, will the computer not eventually correct itself so that it is commanding 11.5? The computer has a learn factor to it as well...so for awhile the computer will command 12.5, but it will see that it will always be "short" and need to add more fuel, so slowly it should start adding more fuel no?
Also, it was suggested that my LTFT's may be causing this to happen as they are suggesting to pull fuel? I have the car set in OL, I have forgot to hit "reset fuel trims" on a few tuning runs, how can I go about shutting LTFT's off so that it does not interfere with these scans?
The LTFT's need to be locking in at 0 when you're WOT. Reset
them. In open loop they shouldn't be affecting anything, but
there's always a possibility.
well the guy that was looking at the scan on hp tuners took a snapshot of them at -11.7 at idle, at 100% throttle it goes from -14 at 3467rpm to 0 at 5904 RPM..
EDIT: When I look at previous logs where I did remember to reset the fuel trims (I.E the one right before the one I posted) at 100% throttle the LTFT is at 0 the whole time.
well I put the PE table to command 12.0 instead of 12.5, and I am getting around 12.6 actual afr at WOT...I still don't get why I have numbers that are 200% in the ve table??
and what do the numbers in the VE table mean...like I have 200%, what is 200%?
VE will only top out at like 140 or so anything above is a waste,VE is only used when the maf sensor is bad or unpluged and the map sensor is used , I think it is , Let me read this other tunning guide I printed up. And I'll correct my post if I'm wrong, and post the info for it.
08' L76 6.0L 4X4 Chevy EXT.Cab LTZ Vortec MAX with Snug top cover, Dynomax exhaust,Hptuners& K&N intake
96' Camaro M5 to A4 conversion, alot of mods . GT35R Turbo full suspension. Built engine
I dont mean I am maxed going left to right...I mean the actual value in the table itself cannot be higher then 200%, I dont hit 140kpa because I am not boosted.
I NEED to tune VE because of the Itbs, I will no longer be running a Maf
I dont mean I am maxed going left to right...I mean the actual value in the table itself cannot be higher then 200%, I dont hit 140kpa because I am not boosted.
I NEED to tune VE because of the Itbs, I will no longer be running a Maf
Sorry , I forget your running Itbs, so I have no idea then, good luck.
08' L76 6.0L 4X4 Chevy EXT.Cab LTZ Vortec MAX with Snug top cover, Dynomax exhaust,Hptuners& K&N intake
96' Camaro M5 to A4 conversion, alot of mods . GT35R Turbo full suspension. Built engine
lol...does anyone know what the numbers in the VE table represent? They are in forms of %, I can't seem to find an answer on any of the forums...
Also, is there ANY speed density maps that we can use? I.e, on hp tuners help page it talks about a 1 bar NA enhanced map for speed density. Can we use this? Is there any changes we can make with our operating system?
I hear some of the GTP's use 2 bar maps from factory...do we not have GTP pcms?
Just use a GTP map sensor , when the RK sport setup came out , it came with a 2 bar map sensor wired inline with the TRC-1 (to decrease timing as boost came up). Might be a option. We don't have GTP PCMs but there is support for them even in our pcms.
08' L76 6.0L 4X4 Chevy EXT.Cab LTZ Vortec MAX with Snug top cover, Dynomax exhaust,Hptuners& K&N intake
96' Camaro M5 to A4 conversion, alot of mods . GT35R Turbo full suspension. Built engine
So Ive been upping all my AE tables...I have the TPS delta maxed at 4, I have the ECT vs run AE table maxed at 4...I'm at 10.5 out of 16 in my baro table...I seem to be seeing progress in my 100kpa WOT table, but only up to about 4200 or 4800 rpm...after that its like I am always 8% shy of fuel, and I am at 200% VE in those cells...why is it that my lower rpms are seeing changes from increased AE numbers, but the higher rpms are not being effected really?
So my truck is finally getting some work done, after 17 years, Oil pressure sensor went out and it’s located under the lower intake manifold. Have to...
Hey guys. For starters I’ve always been a big car guy, I love all types of cars and can appreciate all types of engineering. I’ve always been a Chevy...
need help finding a balancer and a replacement balancer bolt. im at a lost after confusing myself researching.
3 weeks ago
FORUM SPONSORS
Collapse
Working...
X
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment